Objective To investigate the role of apoptosis and the regulating role of receptor interacting protein 1(RIP1) in acute pancreatitis .Methods Thirty C57 mice were divided into three groups :control group ,acute edematous pancreatitis (AEP) group and acute necrotizing pancreatitis (ANP) group .The AEP group was continuously injected by cerulein 50 μg/kg for 13 times ,the ANP group was continuously injected by cerulein 50μg/kg for 13 times and lipopolysaccharide 15 mg/kg once;the con‐trol group was injected by the same volume of normal saline for 7 times .The acinar cell apoptosis was observed by the terminal de‐oxynucleotidyl transferase‐mediated deoxyuridine triphosphate nick‐end labeling (TUNEL) assay .The RIP1 mRNA expression was measured by real time fluorescence PCR .The expression of RIP1 protein was detected by Western blotting .Results The mouse models of AEP and ANP were established successfully .Compared with the control group ,acinar cell apoptosis existed in both AEP and ANP model groups ,moreover compared with the AEP group ,apoptosis in the ANP group were decreased ,the differences were statistically significant(P<0 .05) .Compared with the control group ,the expression of RIP1 mRNA and protein in the AEP group was increased ,while which in the ANP group were decreased ,the differences were statistically significant(P<0 .05) .Conclusion RIP1 participate in the pathogenesis of acute pancreatitis ,which may associate with acinar cell apoptosis .

Objective To explore the clinical effect and side-effect of oxaliplatin(L-OHP)-containing regimen and cisplatin (DDP)-containing regimen in TACE of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods 108 patients with advanced HCC were randomly divided into experimental group(n=55) and control group (n =53). The experimental group were treated with TACE using L-OHP. After dilute with glucose solution, L-OHP(130 mg/m2) and FT207 (500-750 mg/m2) were injected into blood vessel respectively. ADM (40 mg/m2) and LP (10～30 ml) were emulsified and then used for vessel embolism according to the size of focus. The control group received TACE with DDP, DDP (40 mg/m2) and F]'207(500～750 mg,/m2) were diluted with glucose solution, and also according to the size of tumor' s focus, ADM(40 mg/m2) and LP(10～30 ml) were emulsified for vessel embolism, and then diuretic. Results The total effective rate of experimental group was 67.3 % (37/55), and that of control group was 47.2 % (25/53), and the difference was with statistical significance (P <0.05). The descent rate of AFP of experimental group was 73.1%(31/43), and that of control group was 44.7 % (17/38), and the difference was with statistical significance (P <0.05). The main side effects were gastrointestinal reactions, the incidence rate of nausea and vomiting in experimental group were lower than control group, and the difference was with statistical significance. The incidence rate of leucopenia, damage of hepatic function and peripheral neuritis were not significant. Damage of heart and kidney were not found in the two sets. Conclusion L-OHP -containing regimen in TACE of advanced HCC is an efficient method, with good security and good tolerance to patients.

Objective This study aims to investigate the effect of rehabilitation skills training on suicide and relapse prevention of patients with depression.Methods Eighty patients were randomly divided into two groups.One group accepted depression rehabilitation skills training and the other group accepted general health education for 4 weeks.Both groups were followed up by 12 months,and the number of relapse and suicide and the score of Health-related quality of life made by Word Health Organization (WHOQOL-BREF) were recorded.Results The rate of relapse (10.0％ vs.42.5％) and hospitalization (5.0％ vs.20.0％) were lower in skills training group than in control group (P＜0.05).Rate of seeking help of suicide was higher in skills training group than in control group (25.5％ vs.7.5％) (P＜0.05).The suicide mortality was insignificantly different between two groups (0.0％ vs.2.5％) (P＞0.05).The scores of WHOQOL-BREF were significantly higher in skills training group than in control group in follow-up (P＜0.05).Conclusions Rehabilitation skills training program can not only reduce the rate of relapse and suicide but also improve the quality of life of patients with depression.

Objective To evaluate the safety and efficacy of gemcitabine combined with S?1 in the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer. Methods A retrospective analysis of the clinical data of 49 patients with advanced pancreatic cancer, who did not receive radiotherapy and chemotherapy, were divided into two groups:the study group (25 cases), and control group (24 cases). Patients in the study group received gemcitabine 1 000 mg/m2 via intravenous drip at the first and 8th days, and received S?1 80 mg/m2, morning and evening (twice a day) for the first 14 days, and 21 days as a treatment cycle of chemotherapy.The control group was given GEMOX regimen:Gemcitabine 1 000 mg/m2 via intravenous drip at the first and 8 days, and oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 via intravenous drip at the first day, and 21 d for a treatment cycle of chemotherapy. The efficacy and adverse reactions in patients of the study and control groups were observed and compared. Results The efficiency of the study group was 32. 0% and disease control rate was 72.0%. The efficiency of the control group was 25.0% and disease control rate was 58.3%. The differences between the two groups were statistically not significant ( P>0. 05 for all ) . The clinical benefit rate in the study group and control group were 80.0% and 50.0%, respectively, showing a significant difference ( P<0.05) . The median survival time was 9.7 months in patients of the study group and 9.0 months in the control group, with a significant difference (P<0.05). The drug toxicity was well tolerated in both groups, and no chemotherapy?related death occurred. The major adverse reactions were myelosuppression and digestive tract reactions, and the adverse reactions in the study group were lower than those in the control group. Conclusions Gemcitabine combined with S?1 is effective and safe in the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer, with less side effects, and can be tolerated by the patients.

Objective To evaluate the safety and efficacy of gemcitabine combined with S?1 in the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer. Methods A retrospective analysis of the clinical data of 49 patients with advanced pancreatic cancer, who did not receive radiotherapy and chemotherapy, were divided into two groups:the study group (25 cases), and control group (24 cases). Patients in the study group received gemcitabine 1 000 mg/m2 via intravenous drip at the first and 8th days, and received S?1 80 mg/m2, morning and evening (twice a day) for the first 14 days, and 21 days as a treatment cycle of chemotherapy.The control group was given GEMOX regimen:Gemcitabine 1 000 mg/m2 via intravenous drip at the first and 8 days, and oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 via intravenous drip at the first day, and 21 d for a treatment cycle of chemotherapy. The efficacy and adverse reactions in patients of the study and control groups were observed and compared. Results The efficiency of the study group was 32. 0% and disease control rate was 72.0%. The efficiency of the control group was 25.0% and disease control rate was 58.3%. The differences between the two groups were statistically not significant ( P>0. 05 for all ) . The clinical benefit rate in the study group and control group were 80.0% and 50.0%, respectively, showing a significant difference ( P<0.05) . The median survival time was 9.7 months in patients of the study group and 9.0 months in the control group, with a significant difference (P<0.05). The drug toxicity was well tolerated in both groups, and no chemotherapy?related death occurred. The major adverse reactions were myelosuppression and digestive tract reactions, and the adverse reactions in the study group were lower than those in the control group. Conclusions Gemcitabine combined with S?1 is effective and safe in the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer, with less side effects, and can be tolerated by the patients.

OBJECTIVETo evaluate the safety and efficacy of gemcitabine combined with S-1 in the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer.

METHODSA retrospective analysis of the clinical data of 49 patients with advanced pancreatic cancer, who did not receive radiotherapy and chemotherapy, were divided into two groups: the study group (25 cases), and control group (24 cases). Patients in the study group received gemcitabine 1 000 mg/m² via intravenous drip at the first and 8th days, and received S-1 80 mg/m², morning and evening (twice a day) for the first 14 days, and 21 days as a treatment cycle of chemotherapy.The control group was given GEMOX regimen: Gemcitabine 1 000 mg/m² via intravenous drip at the first and 8 days, and oxaliplatin 130 mg/m² via intravenous drip at the first day, and 21 d for a treatment cycle of chemotherapy. The efficacy and adverse reactions in patients of the study and control groups were observed and compared.

RESULTSThe efficiency of the study group was 32.0% and disease control rate was 72.0%. The efficiency of the control group was 25.0% and disease control rate was 58.3%. The differences between the two groups were statistically not significant (P > 0.05 for all). The clinical benefit rate in the study group and control group were 80.0% and 50.0%, respectively, showing a significant difference (P < 0.05). The median survival time was 9.7 months in patients of the study group and 9.0 months in the control group, with a significant difference (P < 0.05). The drug toxicity was well tolerated in both groups, and no chemotherapy-related death occurred. The major adverse reactions were myelosuppression and digestive tract reactions, and the adverse reactions in the study group were lower than those in the control group.

CONCLUSIONSGemcitabine combined with S-1 is effective and safe in the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer, with less side effects, and can be tolerated by the patients.

Antineoplastic Agents ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Deoxycytidine ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; analogs & derivatives ; Drug Administration Schedule ; Drug Combinations ; Humans ; Organoplatinum Compounds ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; Oxonic Acid ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; Pancreatic Neoplasms ; drug therapy ; pathology ; Retrospective Studies ; Tegafur ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects

The minimally invasive cardiovascular surgery developed rapidly in last decades. In order to promote the development of minimally invasive cardiovascular surgery in China, the Chinese Minimally Invasive Cardiovascular Surgery Committee (CMICS) has gradually standardized the collection and report of the data of Chinese minimally invasive cardiovascular surgery since its establishment. The total operation volume of minimally invasive cardiovascular surgery in China has achieved substantial growth with a remarkable popularization of concepts of minimally invasive medicine in 2019. The data of Chinese minimally invasive cardiovascular surgery in 2019 was reported as a paper for the first time, which may provide reference to cardiovascular surgeons and related professionals.

Humans ; Adult ; Serum Albumin, Human ; Consensus ; Cardiac Surgical Procedures ; Thoracic Surgery