MAH(group 2) and TVH (group3);Mean lose blood:TAH(group 1) was much more than other groups remarkably;Mean after operation anus exhaust time:TAH(group 1) and MAH(group 2) was much more than other groups;Mean expenditure:LAVH(group 4) was much more than other groups.Conclusion Every means has its strong point and defect,can't substitute mutually.Operation must be based on technique,installation term,the patient's illness distinguishing feature,the patient's economical capability and their desire to choose the mean.

ObjectiveTo investigate the outcome and repregnancy after different laparoscopicsurgical treatments for tubal pregnancy,and analyse the influential factors. MethodsIn 56 tubal pregnancypatients,28 cases performed laparoscopic salpingostomy (group A) and 28 cases peoformed laparoscopicsalpingectomy (group B). The perioperative condition, the rate of repregnancy and re-ectopic pregnancy was compared and analyzed. Logistic regression analysis was used to detect the effect on subsequent repregnancyof influential factors such as pelvic adhesion. ResultsMore bleeding and longer operative time were needed in group A than group B, there were significant differences between two groups (P ＜ 0.05 ). In follow-up of 6months to 6 yeats,the rate of repregnancy in group A and group B was 46.4％(13/28) and 32.1％(9/28)respectively,there was no significant difference between two groups (P ＞0.05). The rate of re-ectopic pregnancy in group A and group B was 10.7％ (3/28) and 28.6％ (8/28) respectively,there was significant difference between two groups (P ＜0.05). In the single factor analysis,the repregnancy in group A was significantly associated to pelvic adhesion and patency of the contralateral oviduct (P ＜ 0.05 ). Conclusions The rate of repregnancy of laparoscopic salpingostomy is higher than laparoscopic salpingectomy for tubal pregnancy. Each of pelvic adhesion and the patency of the contralateral oviduct is a factor that affects the postoperative fertility. The conservation operation is not recommended for those patients with extensive pelvic adhesion or seriously destroyed tube but normal contralateral oviduct.

Objective To compare the efficacy and toxicity of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with venous and arterial way in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer( LACC ). Methods A retrospective study was carried out on 70 patients suffering from tumor diameter≥4 cm and FIGO stage Ⅰ B- Ⅱ B disease of LACC. Among 70 patients, 36 were given venous chemotherapy ( venous group ) and 34 were given arterial interventional chemotherapy(arterial group). All patients received platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy.The therapeutic toxic and adverse effects of the two groups were analyzed and compared. Results Clinical response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy occurred in 54 patients with a total effective rate of 77.1% (54/70),that of venous group was 72.2% (26/36) and that of arterial group was 82.4% (28/34),there was no significant difference between two groups (P ＞ 0.05 ). The number of the occurrence of gastrointestinal tract reaction and bone marrow depression in venous group (43,32 pieces) was more than that in arterial group (23,17 pieces)(P ＜ 0.01 ). Conclusion The results suggest that the therapeutic effects of venous and arterial interventional chemotherapy be similar,but the adverse effects of venous chemotherapy is more serious than that of arterial interventional chemotherapy.