1.Comparison of rationality and prognostic value between clinical staging and pathological staging for esophageal cancer
Xue QIAO ; Yaqun ZHU ; Yen TIAN
Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology 2014;23(4):307-311
Objective To investigate the rationality and prognostic value of the Criteria for clinical staging of esophageal cancer treated by non-surgical methods (Draft) by comparison with the criteria for postoperative pathological staging.Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical data of 162 patients with esophageal cancer who underwent radical resection at the Second Hospital of Soochow University from December 2008 to July 2012.Preoperative clinical staging and postoperative pathological staging were performed,and the Kappa statistic was used to evaluate the agreement between the two staging systems.The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate overall survival (OS) rates,and the log-rank test was used for survival difference analysis and univariate analysis.Results The coincidence rates of T,N,and TNM stages were 67.9%,57.4%,and 67.9%,respectively,and the agreements were moderate,poor,and moderate,with Kappa values of 0.544,0.302,and 0.509.The follow-up rate was 93.2%.The 1-,2-,and 3-year sample sizes were 127,66 and 27,respectively.The 1-,2-,and 3-year OS rates were 82.6%,56.2%,and 37.7%,respectively.There were no significant differences in OS between patients with preoperative T1 and T2 stages and between patients with preoperative N0 and N1 stages (P =0.086,0.101),but significant differences were observed between patients with different T stages,N stages,or TNM stages (P =0.000-0.028).This was in line with the prognostic results based on the postoperative pathological staging.Conclusions The clinical staging criteria (draft) have moderate agreement with the criteria for postoperative pathological staging and have good prognostic value,but they require further refinement and improvement.
2.Complete atrioventricular block complicating acute anterior myocardial infarction can be reversed with acute coronary angioplasty.
Kay Woon HO ; Tian Hai KOH ; Philip WONG ; Sung Lung WONG ; Yen Teak LIM ; Soo Teik LIM ; Li Fern HSU
Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore 2010;39(3):254-257
INTRODUCTIONA retrospective case series of acute anterior myocardial infarction (MI) patients complicated by complete atrioventricular block (AVB) treated with acute percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA).
CLINICAL PICTUREEight patients with anterior MI and complete AVB underwent acute PTCA between 2000 and 2005. Mean onset of complete AVB was 16.6 +/- 16.9 hours from chest pain onset.
TREATMENTAll patients underwent successful PTCA to the left anterior descending artery.
OUTCOMEComplete AVB resolved with PTCA in 88%; mean time of resolution was 89 +/- 144 minutes after revascularisation. One patient had permanent pacemaker implanted at Day 12 after developing an 8-second ventricular standstill during hospitalisation but not pacing-dependent on follow-up. The rhythm on discharge for the other surviving patients was normal sinus rhythm.
CONCLUSIONThis case series suggests that complete AVB complicating anterior MI is reversible with acute PTCA and survivors are not at increased risk of recurrent AVB. Nevertheless, this condition is associated with extensive myocardial damage and high mortality during the acute hospitalisation was not improved with correction of AVB with temporary pacing.
Adult ; Aged ; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary ; Anterior Wall Myocardial Infarction ; complications ; therapy ; Atrioventricular Block ; complications ; therapy ; Electrocardiography ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Recovery of Function ; Retrospective Studies
3.EPOSTER • DRUG DISCOVERY AND DEVELOPMENT
Marwan Ibrahim ; Olivier D LaFlamme ; Turgay Akay ; Julia Barczuk ; Wioletta Rozpedek-Kaminska ; Grzegorz Galita ; Natalia Siwecka ; Ireneusz Majsterek ; Sharmni Vishnu K. ; Thin Thin Wi ; Saint Nway Aye ; Arun Kumar ; Grace Devadason ; Fatin Aqilah Binti Ishak ; Goh Jia Shen ; Dhaniya A/P Subramaniam ; Hiew Ke Wei ; Hong Yan Ren ; Sivalingam Nalliah ; Nikitha Lalindri Mareena Senaratne ; Chong Chun Wie ; Divya Gopinath ; Pang Yi Xuan ; Mohamed Ismath Fathima Fahumida ; Muhammad Imran Bin Al Nazir Hussain ; Nethmi Thathsarani Jayathilake ; Sujata Khobragade ; Htoo Htoo Kyaw Soe ; Soe Moe ; Mila Nu Nu Htay ; Rosamund Koo ; Tan Wai Yee ; Wong Zi Qin ; Lau Kai Yee ; Ali Haider Mohammed ; Ali Blebil ; Juman Dujaili ; Alicia Yu Tian Tan ; Cheryl Yan Yen Ng ; Ching Xin Ni ; Michelle Ng Yeen Tan ; Kokila A/P Thiagarajah ; Justin Jing Cherg Chong ; Yong Khai Pang ; Pei Wern Hue ; Raksaini Sivasubramaniam ; Fathimath Hadhima ; Jun Jean Ong ; Matthew Joseph Manavalan ; Reyna Rehan ; Tularama Naidu ; Hansi Amarasinghe ; Minosh Kumar ; Sdney Jia Eer Tew ; Yee Sin Chong ; Yi Ting Sim ; Qi Xuan Ng ; Wei Jin Wong ; Shaun Wen Huey Lee ; Ronald Fook Seng Lee ; Wei Ni Tay ; Yi Tan ; Wai Yew Yang ; Shu Hwa Ong ; Yee Siew Lim ; Siddique Abu Nowajish ; Zobaidul Amin ; Umajeyam Anbarasan ; Lim Kean Ghee ; John Pinto ; Quek Jia Hui ; Ching Xiu Wei ; Dominic Lim Tao Ran ; Philip George ; Chandramani Thuraisingham ; Tan Kok Joon ; Wong Zhi Hang ; Freya Tang Sin Wei ; Ho Ket Li ; Shu Shuen Yee ; Goon Month Lim ; Wen Tien Tan ; Sin Wei Tang
International e-Journal of Science, Medicine and Education 2022;16(Suppl1):21-37