1.Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair in Patients with Ischemic Heart Disease.
Hiroshi Urayama ; Kenji Kawakami ; Fuminori Kasashima ; Yuhshi Kawase ; Takeshi Harada ; Yasushi Matsumoto ; Hirofumi Takemura ; Naoki Sakakibara ; Michio Kawasuji ; Yoh Watanabe
Japanese Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery 1995;24(1):31-35
Ischemic heart disease (IHD) poses a major complicating factor for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. To identify patients with IHD, we evaluated patients scheduled to undergo AAA repair with dipyridamole-thallium scintigraphy (DTS) and coronary angiography (CAG). If indicated, coronary revascularization was performed. Finally, an assessment of the effectiveness of these preventive measures was made. One hundred and ten patients scheduled to undergo AAA repair were identified and treated accordingly over a 20-year period. As the pre-operative evaluation and prophylactic surgical revascularization strategies were instituted in 1983, the patients were divided into 2 groups: 25 patients between 1973-1982 (group A) and 85 patients between 1983-1992 (group B). The mean age of patients in group A was 65.3 years. The male/female ratio within this group was 21:4. One patient in the group had a history of IHD and 9 had hypertention. The mean age of patients in group B was 67.7 years. The male/female ratio within this group was 77:8. Fourteen patients in this group had a history of IHD and 27 had hypertension. Screening and treatment of IHD in group B was as follows. All patients with a history of IHD underwent CAG. Of the 32 patients with cardiac risk factors, including hypertension and hyperlipidemia, or ECG abnormalities who underwent DTS, 8 were referred for CAG. Thirty-nine patients with no risk factors and a normal ECG proceeded to AAA repair without further workup. Perioperative myocardial infarction occurred in 2 patients in grouzp A, leading to death in 1 patient. Coronary revascularization was performed in 5 patients in group B. No perioperative myocardial infarction occurred in this group. Pre-operative identification of high-risk cases with DTS, CAG, and coronary revascularization in patients with IHD may prevent cardiovascular complications in patients undergoing AAA repair.
2.Effects of Postgraduate Training on Quality of Ambulatory Care by Internists.
Junji OHTAKI ; Kenji OKAMURA ; Naotaka ATSUMI ; Sohji NAGASE ; Hiromasa KASHIMURA ; Mayumi IWAKAWA ; Kenji YUZAWA ; Yasushi KAWAKAMI ; Kamejiro YAMASHITA
Medical Education 1995;26(4):247-253
Objective.-To survey a broad sample of Japanese internists regarding the effects of postgraduate training on their ability to provide ambulatory care.
Design.-Analysis of internists trained at university or non-university hospitals (as designated by the Ministry of Health and Welfare) by written questionnaire.
Results.-74.0% of respondents (127 in total) had undergone ambulatory care training. 30.7% were trained in outpatient clinic sessions that were held more than once a week on average. 85.8% of respondents said they recognized the differences between ambulatory care and inpatietn care. Furthermore, the percentage of respondents who understood such differences during their postgraduate training periods was higher in the group that had had ambulatory care training than the group that had not. Many respondents also suggested the necessity of training in non-internal medicine specialties (e. g. dermatology, OB-GYN, otolaryngology, orthopedics, urology and ophthalmology) that were not popular postgraduate training programs.
Conclusion.-Postgraduate training had a large effect on the ability of internists to provide ambulatory care. Japanese postgraduate training is still not sufficient in this regard. Residency training programs should put more emphasis on ambulatory care.
3.The Effects of Feedback Evaluation on Postgraduate Clinical Training.
Kenji OKAMURA ; Junji OHTAKI ; Naotaka ATSUMI ; Yasushi KAWAKAMI ; Kenji YUZAWA ; Souji NAGASE ; Hiromasa KASHIMURA ; Mayumi IWAKAWA ; Kamejiro YAMASHITA
Medical Education 1995;26(4):263-268
Our previous study concerning evaluation methods of postgraduate clinical training showed a usefulness in improving clinical training, especially in the fields of clinical skills and knowledge. However, it also pointed out the unsolved problem of assessment of those behaviors in which no significant differences were shown throughout the residency period. In order to solve this problem, a feedback system has been introduced, consisting of self-evaluation during the residensy, and appropriate counseling regarding hortcomings.
In the present study, the effect of this feedback system on clinical training, particularly on physician behavior, has been analyzed. The study was performed by comparing evaluation scores, based on a five-point scale, from two groups: 35 residents who did not undergo the feedback system, and 84 residents who had. Clinical skills, knowledge, positiveness, behavior with patients and colleagues, and patients' records, were each evaluated after discussions by the teaching staff.
Our results showed that there was a significant improvement not only in clinical skills and knowledge, but also in physician behavior in the group using the feedback system. Thus, it appears that this feedback system is useful in improving postgraduate clinical training.
4.Validity and Problems of a Family Practice Residency based on a Rotation Curriculum.
Kenji OKAMURA ; Yuki SHIBUI ; Gaku NIIZAWA ; Junji OHTAKI ; Yasushi KAWAKAMI ; Naotaka ATSUMI ; Souji NAGASE ; Hiromasa KASHIMURA ; Gohei OCHI ; Kazuo ORII ; Kamejirou YAMASHITA ; Kenkichi KOISO
Medical Education 1994;25(1):43-48
5.A Workshop on Supporting Students with Developmental Disabilities 2023
Kei MUKOHARA ; Yasushi MIYATA ; Hideki NOMURA ; Mayumi ASAHINA ; Shinji TAKADA ; Chikako INOUE ; Chihiro KAWAKAMI ; Koju FUNAKOSHI
Medical Education 2023;54(5):484-487
With the enactment of the amended Anti-Discrimination Act, which mandates the provision of reasonable accommodations, the urgent task for all health professional education institutions is to establish a support system for students with developmental disabilities. On the other hand, they are also required to fulfill their social accountability through quality assurance in education, such as the implementation of outcome-based education curriculum. In order to consider how to balance reasonable accommodations for students with developmental disabilities, quality assurance in education, and social accountability in undergraduate medical education, Professionalism Subcommittee held a workshop on April 22, 2023. The participants engaged in active discussions during the workshop. Through a post-workshop survey, educational needs and challenges in supporting students with developmental disabilities were clarified, providing insights for future Subcommittee activities.