The delineation of clinical target volume (CTV) is a critical step in planning conformal radiotherapy for rectal cancer.Several guidelines suggest different subvolumes and anatomical boundaries in radiotherapy for rectal cancer, potentially leading to a misunderstanding of CTV definition.This article reviews recent advances in the delineation of CTV in radiotherapy for rectal cancer.

Objective To investigate the rationality and prognostic value of the Criteria for clinical staging of esophageal cancer treated by non-surgical methods (Draft) by comparison with the criteria for postoperative pathological staging.Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical data of 162 patients with esophageal cancer who underwent radical resection at the Second Hospital of Soochow University from December 2008 to July 2012.Preoperative clinical staging and postoperative pathological staging were performed,and the Kappa statistic was used to evaluate the agreement between the two staging systems.The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate overall survival (OS) rates,and the log-rank test was used for survival difference analysis and univariate analysis.Results The coincidence rates of T,N,and TNM stages were 67.9％,57.4％,and 67.9％,respectively,and the agreements were moderate,poor,and moderate,with Kappa values of 0.544,0.302,and 0.509.The follow-up rate was 93.2％.The 1-,2-,and 3-year sample sizes were 127,66 and 27,respectively.The 1-,2-,and 3-year OS rates were 82.6％,56.2％,and 37.7％,respectively.There were no significant differences in OS between patients with preoperative T1 and T2 stages and between patients with preoperative N0 and N1 stages (P =0.086,0.101),but significant differences were observed between patients with different T stages,N stages,or TNM stages (P =0.000-0.028).This was in line with the prognostic results based on the postoperative pathological staging.Conclusions The clinical staging criteria (draft) have moderate agreement with the criteria for postoperative pathological staging and have good prognostic value,but they require further refinement and improvement.

More than 20 studies published during the past 10 years concerning preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer were reviewed carefully. And we evaluated the role of IMRT being routinely used in preoperative treatment of rectal cancer.

Objective To explore the efficacy and prognostic factors of postoperative intensity?modulated radiotherapy ( IMRT) with or without chemotherapy in rectal cancer. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical data of 218 patients with rectal cancer, who underwent postoperative IMRT in our hospital from January 2009 to December 2013. The Kaplan?Meier method was used to calculate survival rate;the log?rank test was used for survival difference analysis and univariate prognostic analysis;the Cox regression model was used for multivariate prognostic analysis. Results The follow?up rate was 97. 7%. The 1?and 3?year overall survival rates were 90. 8% and 75. 2%, respectively, the 1?and 3?year disease?free survival rates were 85. 3% and 70. 5%, respectively, and the 1?and 3?year locoregional recurrence?free survival rates were 96. 7% and 88. 1%, respectively. The incidence of grade 3?4 acute adverse reactions was 28. 4%, mainly manifested as leukopenia ( 13. 8%) and diarrhea ( 11. 0%) . Univariate prognostic analysis showed that preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen ( CEA) and CA199 levels, maximum tumor diameter, tumor location, degree of differentiation, depth of tumor invasion, number of lymph node metastases, TNM stage, perineural invasion, surgical procedure, total mesorectal excision, preoperative bowel obstruction, and preoperative anemia were the predictors of survival ( P=0. 006, 0. 000, 0. 000, 0. 017, 0. 000, 0. 016, 0. 000,0. 011,0. 001,0. 006,0. 037 and 0. 010) . Multivariate prognostic analysis showed that preoperative CEA level, tumor location, TNM stage, preoperative bowel obstruction, and preoperative anemia were the predictors of survival ( P=0. 000,0. 000,0. 000,0. 001 and 0. 001) . Conclusions Postoperative IMRT with or without chemotherapy is an effective method for rectal cancer with mild adverse reactions and high compliance. Preoperative CEA level, tumor position, TNM stage, preoperative bowel obstruction, and preoperative anemia are independent prognostic factors for the overall survival.

Objective To evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced (inoperable) rectal cancer. Methods Seventy-six patients with locally advanced (T_4) or recurrent rectal cancer were randomized into two groups of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with either oxaliplatin plus 5-FU (oxaliplatin 130 mg/m~2, day 1,5-FU 350 mg/m~2, day 1 -5 ,LV 200 mg/m~2, day 1 -5, 4 weeks per cycle) or capecitabine (1650 mg/m~2, day 1 -14, 3 weeks per cycle) alone. All patients received pelvic three-dimensional conforrnal radiotherapy (3 DCRT) of 46 -50 Gy in 23 -25 fractions, with a boost of 14 -18 Gy in 7 -9 fractions. Results The median follow-up time was 19 months. The overall response rate was 64% in the oxaliplatin/5-FU group comparing with 58% in the capecitabine group (χ~2 = 0. 08 ,P =0. 772), with the median survival time of 22 months and 18 months (u = 17.71, P = 0. 077), respectively. The overall survival in the two groups was 68% and 63% at 1 year, and 21% and 19% at 2 years, respectively (χ~2 = 0. 97, P = 0. 326). There were no treatment-related deaths or grade 4 toxicities. Neutrocytopenia (39. 5% vs 77.7%, z = -3.97,P =0. 0001), diarrhea (47.4% vs 88.9%, z = -4. 78, P = 0. 0001), nausea and vomiting (68.4% vs 97.2%, z = -3. 17, P = 0. 0001), and neurotoxicity (5.3% vs 66.7%, z= -6.56, P= 0.0001) were more common in the oxaliplatin/5-FU group. Conclusions Concurrent chemoradiotherapy is well-tolerated and effective in patients with locally advanced (inoperable) rectal cancer.

Objective To systematically evaluate the risk factors for upper extremity lymphedema after breast cancer treatment and the strength of their associations.Methods PubMed,Ovid,EMbase,and the Cochrane Library were searched to identify clinical trials published up to December 2012.The quality of included studies was assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale;data analysis was performed by Stata 10.0 and RevMan 5.2;the strength of associations between risk factors and breast cancer-related upper extremity lymphedema was described as odds ratio (OR) and 95％ confidence intervals (CI).Results Twenty-two studies involving 10106 patients were included in the meta-analysis.The risk factors for upper extremity lymphedema after breast cancer treatment mainly included axillary lymph node dissection (OR =2.72,95％ CI=1.06-6.99,P=0.038),hypertension (OR=1.84,95％ CI=1.38-2.44,P=0.000),body mass index (OR =1.68,95％ CI=1.22-2.32,P =0.001),and radiotherapy (OR =1.65,95％ CI =1.20-2.25,P =0.002),while no significant associations were found for such factors as chemotherapy,age,number of positive lymph nodes,and number of dissected lymph nodes.Conclusions The incidence of upper extremity lymphedema is high among patients with breast cancer after treatment,and axillary lymph node dissection,hypertension,body mass index,and radiotherapy are the main risk factors for lymphedema after breast cancer treatment.

Objective MicroRNAs (miRNAs) play important roles in the chemoradiotherapy efficacy of rectal cancer (RC).This study aimed to screen the chemoradiotherapy-associated microRNAs and their target genes of RC through bioinformatics approaches in order to promote the fundamental study of RC chemoradiotherapy.Methods The chemoradiotherapy-associated microRNAs were manually searched through the published papers via PubMed and its target genes were identified by comprehensively analyzing these public data of microRNA-mRNA and gene expression profiles.Both gene ontology (GO) and pathway analysis of the target genes were performed by DAVID and IPA programs,respectively.Results A total of 38 microRNAs were collected from PubMed,and 3 545 putative target genes were inferred from the integrated microRNA-mRNA associations,among them,131 were differentially expressed (DE) (P ＜ 0.05) in the selected gene expression profile (GSE35452).The GO and pathway enrichment analyses indicated that the DE genes were closely involved in the responses of chemoradiotherapy of RC.Conclusions These microRNAs and their regulated DE genes may contribute to the molecular mechanism of the differential efficacy of RC chemoradiotherapy,which may provide a theoretical reference for predicting the response of RC to chemoradiotherapy.

Objective To verify the safety and feasibility of applying laparoendoscopic singlesite radical prostatectomy (LESS-LRP) in the treatment of prostate cancer. Methods From Sept. to Dec. 2010, LESS-LRP was used to treat 2 early stage prostate cancer patients. The LESS-LRP was preformed through extra-peritoneal approach by using standard laparoscopic instruments and a 5 mm flexible laparoscope. This technique were evaluated in respects of operative time, estimated blood loss, intraoperative complications, drainage time, post-operative pain score (VAPS), post-operative hospital stay, pathological results and post-operative PSA levels. Results All procedures of the 2cases were completed with LESS-LRP without conversion to standard laparoscopic or open radical prostatectomy. The operative times for LESS-LRP were 280 and 285 min, estimated blood loss were 400 and 200 ml, respectively. There was no severe intraoperative complication. The drainage times were 2 and 6 d, the VAPS in the first post-operative day were 1 and 0, and post-operative hospital stay were 14 and 7 d. There was no secondary bleeding or wound infection. The 2 prostate cancer cases were all in pathological stage pT2c N0 M0. Surgical margins of the specimens were negative. The first case showed PSA of 0. 033 ng/ml 1 month after the surgery. Conclusion LESS-LRP can be an exploratory option in clinical for the treatment of prostate cancer.

Rectal cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors in China, and the proportion of elderly patients is also increasing. Due to the lack of prospective evidence-based medical research for elderly patients, no consensus on the optimal treatment model has been reached. In this article, relevant researches on the comprehensive treatment strategy of locally advanced rectal cancer in the elderly patients were reviewed, aiming to provide reference for individualized treatment of elderly patients.

Objective To verify the clinical safety and feasibility of applying laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) in the treatment of elder patients with urological tumors. Methods From August 2010 to March 2011, LESS technique was used to do prostatectomy in five cases, nephrectomy in 3 cases and adrenalectomy in four cases. Quadport was inserted through a transumbilical incision. Flexible tip 5 mm laparoscope and standard laparoscopic instruments were employed. This technique was evaluated in respects of operative time, estimated blood loss, intraoperative complications, drainage time, post-operative visual analogue pain scale (VAPS), post-operative hospital stay and pathological change. Results All the procedures in this group were completed successfully with LESS. There was no additional trocarand conversion to standard laparoscopic or open surgery. Application of Quadport reduced the clash of instruments. Carefully performing surgery and avoiding blunt dissection to reduce intraoperative bleeding is the cornerstone of success. The operative time and estimated blood loss were (192.0±76.7) min and (174.6±167.2) ml, respectively. There was no severe intraoperative complication and blood transfusion. The VAPS in the first post-operative day was (0.9 ± 1.0) minutes and the drainage time was (3.5±1.7) d while post-operative hospital stays were (7.9±3.4) d. There was no occurrence of secondary bleeding and wound infection. Conclusions LESS is a safe and feasible alternative for the treatment of urological tumors in elderly patients, but needs further clinical investigation.