In 2013 Shanghai took the lead to carry out the specialist standardized training which is common in the international medical education. This paper first gives a picture of the general condition of the standardized training on specialists of obstetrics and gynecology in Shanghai. Then from the perspectives of strategic deployment, department management, clinical skill training and the training of examiners, the paper explores the assessment model in which both the assessment of train-ing process and the scores of the final examination are considered whereas the process assessment is given more weight. This paper is aimed to provide experience and suggestions for the further advance of the specialists standardized training in the field of obstetrics and gynecology.

To analyze the potential limitations of hospital-level research projects management by summarizing its performance status from 2008 to 2011,including but not limited to lack of time for conducting research,insufficient financial funds,inadequate funding application,inadequate supervision.Thus,since 2014,our hospital has adopted some new measurements for projects management,including full-time research,hierarchical management,full mobilization,the establishment of reward and punishment measures,which significantly improved the quality of hospital-level research projects,and the rate of longitudinal follow-up project,research enthusiasm of medical staff,and sustainable development of hospital science and technology.

Objective To explore the management model of scientific research projects based on the application of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC).Methods We retrospectively analyzed the NSFC funding of our hospital during 2009-2017.Results Our hospital sets up the pre—experiment special project of NSFC and "full—time" policy,development translational medicine research center platform,introduce and train scientific talents,strength the delicacy management of scientific research and so on.Through the above measurements,NSFC funding in our hospital was significantly improved.The number of projects approved increased from 1 to 23,and the amount approved increased from 300 thousand to 21 million 350 thousand yuan during the eight yesrs.Conclusions The policy,platform,personnel and delicacy management have effectively improved the quality and quantity of NSFC,and promote the sustainable development of the hospital science and technology.

Objective: To explore the effect of a phased rehabilitation training programme to relieve shoulder dysfunction in patients after neck dissection and to provide effective solutions for postoperative shoulder joint function recovery of patients Methods: This study has been reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee, and informed consent has been obtained from patients. A phased rehabilitaiton training programme for the shoulder after neck dessection was developed through literature review and discussion, and 70 eligible patients from Hospital of Stomatology, Sun Yat-sen University from December 2020 to April 2021 were selected and randomly divided into the test group and control group (35 patients in each group). The control group underwent motor rehabilitation training from 6 weeks postoperative to 1 year after surgery, such as shoulder mobility and coordination training and small range of motion training of the neck, while the test group took part in a rehabilitation training program that included familiarization maneuver training, protective rehabilitation, exercise rehabilitation, and resistance training in the following four stages: preoperative, postoperative general anesthesia and awake until the removal of stitches, the removal of stitches until 6 weeks after surgery, and 6 weeks after surgery until 1 year after surgery. The frequency of training in both groups was at least 3 days per week, and the length of each training session was 10-15 min. The intensity of exercise was 2-3 points on the Borg Conscious Exercise Intensity Scale (i.e., mild-to-moderate tachypnea or fatigue). The neck dissection injury index (NDII) was used to evaluate the quality of life related to shoulder joint function at four time points: preoperative, postoperative 3 months, postoperative 6 months, and postoperative 12 months. The higher the score, the better the quality of life. Results: 28 cases in the test group and 32 cases in the control group completed a one-year follow-up. At 3 and 6 months postoperative, the NDII of the test group was significantly higher than that of the control group [3 months postoperative: test group (93.48 ± 9.36) vs. control group (80.00 ± 11.34) (P<0.001), 6 months postoperative: test group (98.21 ± 4.76) vs. control group (90.70 ± 9.12) (P<0.001)]; 12 months after surgery, the NDII of the test group (97.23 ± 4.88) was still higher than that of the control group (96.33 ± 4.49), but the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.458). The difference in NDII scores among subjects at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery was statistically significant in each group (P<0.001). Conclusion The application of the phased rehabilitation training method in neck dissection patients has a feasibility and could improve the quality of life of patients' shoulder joint function within 6 months after surgery.