Objective To sum up the experience in the management of acute infrarenal abdominal aorta occlusion. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 34 cases of acute infrarenal abdominal aorta occlusion treated during a period of 18 years. Cell saver was used intraoperatively in five cases.Results Twelve cases died postoperatively in this group (35 3%), with acute post operative renal failure, metabolic acidosis and hyperkalemia being the main causes of death. No acute renal failure and metabolic acidosis occurred in all cases treated by cell saver during operation. Limbs were salvaged in 36 out of 44 extremities of patients surviving the surgical procedure. ConclusionsPrompt diagnosis, proper surgery and correct management of post operative complications are necessary to decrease mortality. Perioperative application of cell saver is recommended to eliminate metabolic wastes from the body.

ObjectivesTo analyse the causes of occlusion of prosthetic grafts and to explore the appropriate modality of reoperation.MethodThe clinical data of 47 patients with occlusive prosthetic grafts were analyzed retrospectively. The procedure of treatment for patients with different causes of occlusive graft included thrombectomy alone in 9 cases, thrombectomy and anastomotic plasty in 16 cases, new bypass using prosthetic graft and saphenous autograft in 22 cases. ResultsThe reoccurrence of graft occlusion in patients undergoing thrombectomy alone or thrombectomy and anastomotic plasty was 67% and 56% respectively, which was siginificantly higher than that of 9% in patients treated by a new arterial bypass with prosthetic grafts and saphenous autografts. ConclusionsThe result of new bypass for occlusive prosthetic graft is superior to thrombectomy alone or thrombectomy and anatomotic plasty.

Objective To investigate the intra- and interobserver repeatability of coronary artery disease (CAD) diagnosis based on invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and CT coronary angiography (CTCA).Methods Two readers with comparable experience ( over 10 years) independently evaluated ICA results of 42 consecutive patients with a blind method. After 30 days,one of them reviewed the same patients again.Another two comparable-experience (over 10 years) readers evaluated the results of CTCA (prospectively ECG-triggering) from the same 42 patients in the same way.The inter-reader and intra-reader repeatability of ICA and CTCA were analyzed by performing Kappa test and calculating the percentage of the segments with agreement on stenotic degree.Using ICA as reference,the accuracy of CTCA in diagnosing CAD was studied by comparing the area under ROC. Results The Kappa between readers for ICA and CTCA were 0.91 and 0.81.Intra-reader Kappa were 0.92 and 0.83 respectively (x2 =509.4 and 432.5,all P ＜0.01 ).The percentage of the segments with agreement between readers on the degree of stenosis were 80.8％ (494/611) in ICA and 75.2％ (469/624) in CTCA ( x2 =2.75,P =0.10),and within the same reader,86.9％ (531/611)in ICA and 81.9％ (511/624) in CTCA(x2 =3.76,P =0.053).With≥ 50％narrowing as a CAD diagnosis criterion,the agreement rates for two readers were 96.6％ (590/611 ) in ICA and 94.4％ (589/624) in CTCA( x2 =3.36,P =0.07),and for the same reader,97.4％ (595/611) in ICA,95.4％ (595/624) in CTCA ( x2 =3.62,P =0.06).Using ICA as reference,two readers of CTCA results achieved a sensitivity and specificity of 84.9％ (530/624)and 98.1％ (612/624).The area under ROC was 0.94 (95％ CI 0.91-0.97).Conclusions Both ICA and CTCA demonstrate good repeatability in diagnosing CAD.The repeatability of ICA is superior to that of CTCA.A certain discrepancy exists in two readings from the same reader or two readers.