1.Comparison of double versus standard dose trimetazidine on myocardial protection in patients with unstable angina undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention
Dongdong ZHAI ; Yalei HAN ; Lei WANG ; Teng MA ; Chuanjun CHEN ; Meng ZHANG
Chinese Journal of Interventional Cardiology 2017;25(2):77-81
Objective To compare the protective effect of double dose trimetazidine versus standard dose in patients with unstable angina and received PCI. Methods From September 2014 to June 2015,150 unstable angina pectoris patients who underwent PCI in our hospital were enrolled in this study. All the patients were randomized into two groups:the study group (patients given trimetazidine 40 mg tid 24 hours before operation) and the control group (patients given trimetazidine 20 mg tid 24 hours before operation). All patients received standard secondary prevention therapies of coronary heart disease. Comparison in the rates of angina pectoris attacks, ECG changes after PCI, levels of cardiac troponin I ( cTnI), myoglobin (Mb), creatine kinase isoenzyme ( CK-MB) and hs-CRP before and 12 hours after PCI was investigated between the 2 groups. Results Baseline data were comparable in the 2 groups. Rates of adverse drug reaction were lower in the control group, but the difference was not statistically significant (6. 7% vs. 2. 7% , P = 0. 439). There was no statistical difference between the two groups before PCI in terms of levels of cTNI and hs-CRP but was significantly lowered in the study group after PCI as compared to the control (both P < 0. 05 after PCI). The levels of CK-MB and Mb in the study group were lower than those in the control group after PCI, but the difference was not statistically significant. The rates of angina pectoris attacks and the changes in ST-T were less in the study group as compared to the control group without statistical significance. Conclusions Unstable angina pectoris patients receiving double dose of trimetazidine before PCI may enhance myocardial protection and reduce PCI related myocardial injury.
2.Evaluation of anticoagulant efficacy and safety for domestic bivalirudin during percutaneous coronary intervention in elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome
Meng ZHANG ; Na LI ; Lei WANG ; Yalei HAN ; Dongdong ZHAI ; Weihua JIN ; Bin WANG
Chinese Journal of Interventional Cardiology 2014;(5):318-321
Objective To evaluate the safety and efficacy of bivalirudin during perioperation of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients older than 80 years old with acute coronary syndrome. Methods A total of 64 patients were randomly divided into two groups, respectively received heparin(n=32), or bivalirudin (n=32). We compared the activated coagulation time (ACT), procedural success rate, bleeding rate between two groups. Results The two groups ACT, PCI success rates are not statistically different, No signiifcant difference in the incidence of mild hemorrhage which is 4 (12.5%) for heparin and 1(3.1%) for bivalirudin and severe bleeding which is 2 (6.2%) for heparin and 0 for bivalirudin. However there are signiifcant differences in the overall incidence of bleeding between the two groups with lower incidence of beeding in the bivalirudin group than the heparin group (P<0.05). Conclusions Bivalirudin has comparable anticoangulation effect as heparin during perioperation of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) among patients older than 80 years of age with acute coronary syndrome with lower bleeding incidence than heparin dose.