1.Outcome of application of primary versus secondary Illizarov's fixator in open tibial shaft fractures
Joshi ANIL ; Singh SAURABH ; Jain SUDEEP ; Rohilla NARENDER ; Trikha VIVEK ; Yadav CHANDRA
World Journal of Emergency Medicine 2016;7(3):221-226
BACKGROUND: The present study aimed to compare outcome of primary and secondary Illizarov''s fi xator application as a treatment method for type Ⅲ open tibial fractures in terms of non-union and wound infection.METHODS: This prospective study was done in a tertiary care center. Forty-eight type Ⅲ tibial fractures were treated with Illizarov''s apparatus between 2008 and 2011. The patients were divided into two groups depending on the treatment protocol, timing of wound closure and Illizarov''s application, primary (n=28) and secondary (n=20).RESULTS: In the primary group, healing was achieved in all 28 patients. The median time to recovery was 24 weeks, and the median number of operations was 3. There were 6 patients with a bone defect. In the secondary group, complete recovery was achieved in 18 out of 20 patients. The median time to recovery was 30 weeks, and the median number of operations 5. There were 9 patients with a bone defect. The median time to recovery and the number of operations were signifi cantly smaller in patients undergoing primary operation. Union was 100% in the primary group and more than 95% in the secondary group. Chronic osteomyelitis persisted in one patient and below amputation was done in one patient in the secondary group.CONCLUSION: Primary wound closure and Illizarov''s fixation required a smaller number of operations and shorter time to recovery than secondary wound closure and Illizarov''s fi xation, mostly due to a signifi cantly less number of patients with a bone defect in the primary group.
2.Role of locking plates in treatment of difficult ununited fractures: a clinical study.
Ashok KUMAR ; Himanshu GUPTA ; Chandra-Shekhar YADAV ; Shah-Alam KHAN ; Shishir RASTOGI
Chinese Journal of Traumatology 2013;16(1):22-26
OBJECTIVETo present our experience in treatment of difficult ununited long bone fractures with locking plate.
METHODSRetrospective evaluation of locking plate fixation in 10 difficult nonunions of long bone fractures was done. Fixation was done with locking plate for femoral shaft fracture (3 patients), supracondylar fracture of femur (gap nonunion), fracture of clavicle, fracture of both forearm bones (radius and ulna) fracture of ulna, fracture of shaft of humerus, fracture of tibial diaphysis and supracondylar fracture of humerus (one patient each). Five fractures had more than one previous failed internal fixation. One patient had infected nonunion which was managed by debridement with cast immobilization followed by fixation with locking plate at six weeks. Seven fractures were atrophic, two were oligotrophic, and one was hypertrophic. Fibular autograft was used in 2 cases and iliac crest cancellous bone graft used in all the patients.
RESULTSMinimum follow-up was 6 months (range, 6 months to 2.5 years). Average time for union was 3.4 months (range 2.5 to 6 months). None of the patients had plate-related complications or postoperative wound infections.
CONCLUSIONAlong with achieving stability with locking compression plate, meticulous soft tissue dissection, acceptable reduction, good fixation technique and bone grafting can help achieve union in difficult nonunion cases. Though locking plate does not by itself ensure bony union, we have found it to be another useful addition to our armamentarium for treating difficult fracture nonunions.
Adult ; Bone Plates ; Child ; Female ; Fractures, Ununited ; therapy ; Humans ; Male ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome