1.Impact of endplate facture on prognosis of thoracolumbar fracture
Xuede GUO ; Jianhua YUAN ; Xijun LIANG
Orthopedic Journal of China 2006;0(14):-
[Objective]To investigate the impact of endplate facture on prognosis of thoracolumbar fracture.[Method]Seventy-three patients with thoracolumbar fractures were treated with transpedicular bone grafting combined with pedicle screw fixation system.Of them,thirty-four cases eligible for the study were divided into groups A and B.Group A:no endplate fracture or minor endplate fracture.Group B:bursting endplate fracture.The height of fractured vertebra and the Cobb angle before and after operation,and at the final follow-up were determined and analysed.[Result]There were no significant differences in Cobb angles and height between growps A and B before operation.After operation,the height of fractured vertebra in group B were lower than that of group A.The Cobb angles had no significant difference between the two groups.The height and Cobb angles between the two groups had significant difference at final follow-up.The improvement in group A was significant higher than in group B.[Conclusion]Endplate bursting facture affects the reduction of fractured vertebra and causes loss of the vertebral height and the corrected angle.
2.Interlocking intramedullary nail versus dynamic compression plate fixation for nonunion after femoral shaft fracture
Cai SONG ; Xijun LIANG ; Xiangyang LIU ; Xuede GUO
Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research 2015;(35):5663-5668
BACKGROUND:Bone nonunion may occur after limb trauma fracture. Internal fixation of implant is a common mode of repair, but fixation of different implants has different effects. OBJECTIVE:To explore the application value of different implant fixation in limb trauma of nonunion after femoral shaft fracture. METHODS:A retrospective analysis was performed on 72 cases of nonunion after femoral shaft fractures in Bozhou People’s Hospital from November 2012 to November 2013. They were divided into the observation group (36 cases) and control group (36 cases) according to the way of treatment, which were given interlocking intramedul ary nail and dynamic compression plate fixation. Length of incision, intraoperative blood transfusion volume, postoperative drainage volume, operation time, fracture healing time and functional recovery of knee joint were observed and compared between the two groups. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:There was no statistical significance in operation time and length of the incision between the two groups (both P>0.05). Intraoperative amount of blood transfusion and postoperative drainage were significantly higher in the control group than in the observation group;the fracture healing time was significantly longer in the control group than in the observation group;infection rate in final fol ow-up was significantly higher in the control group than in the observation group (al P<0.05). No significant differences in preoperative knee joint International Knee Documentation Committee knee evaluation form and Lysholm score were found between the two groups (al P>0.05), but above two scores were significantly higher in the observation group than in the control group in final fol ow-up (al P<0.05). These findings suggest that compared with the dynamic compression plate, interlocking intramedul ary nail in treatment of bone nonunion after femoral shaft fracture can obtain good effect, firm fixation, low infection rate, and is more in line with the physiological and biomechanical requirements.