1.Biological typing and drug resistance analysis of Haemophilus strains from respiratory tract
Xiuai JIANG ; Ziyun ZHAO ; Bei JIANG ; Xiansen QIAO
International Journal of Laboratory Medicine 2015;(19):2840-2841,2843
Objective To investigate season distribution,biological typing and drug resistant of Haemophitus in Qingdao Central Hospital.Methods The sputum and throat swab were collected from patients with respiratory tract infection,221 Haemophilus strains were identified and typed by the manual method and MicSCAN4 automatic analyzer,HNID identification plate.Antimicrobial susceptibility was tested by Kirby-Bauer method,and cephalosporins nitrate thiophene paper method was used to detect β-lacta-mase.Results A total of 96 strains of Haemophilus influenzae(1.6%)were isolated,10(10.4%)strains of Haemophilus influenzae were identified as type Ⅰ,31(32.3%)as type Ⅱ,40(41.7%)as typeⅢand 1 5(1 5.6%)as other types.A total of 125 strains Hae-mophitus parl influenzae(2.1%)were isolated,1 5 (12.0%)strains of Haemophilus parl influenzae were identified as type Ⅰ,23 (18.4%)as typeⅡ,69(55.2%)as type Ⅲ and 18(14.4%)as type Ⅳ,other types were not identified.The highest infected rate was in winter.Resistance rate of Haemophilus influenzae and Haemophitus parl influenzae to ampicillin were 40.6% and 44.8%,to tri-methoprim-sulfamethoxazole were 5 1.0% and 66.4%.The prevalence ofβ-lactamase of all strains were 40.6%and 44.8%.But sus-ceptible rates of Haemophilus to cefotaxime,cefuroxime,meropenem,chloramphenicol were over 90.0%.Conclusion The respira-tory tract infections to Haemophilus influenzae and Haemophitus parl influenzae is more frequently found in winter.Type Ⅱ and type Ⅲ are the most prevalent types.The resistance rates of Haemophilus to ampicillin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole are in-creasing,should not be used as empirical treatment of Haemophilus infection.Antibiotics such as cefotaxime,cefuroxime,meropen-em could be chosen for the treatment of respiratory tract infection caused by Haemophilus.
2.Analysis resistance of Streptococcus pneumoniae of some hospital in Qingdao from 2005 to 2008
Weiqing HUANG ; Ziyun ZHAO ; Yanhui MA ; Xiuai JIANG
Chinese Journal of Microbiology and Immunology 2009;29(11):1014-1016
Objective To monitor the resistance of Streptococcus pneumoniae following the 2004 in Qingdao area, and to provide a reasonable basis for clinical application of antimicrobial agents. Methods Collecting respiratory tract, blood, cerebrospinal fluid and other specimens from out-patient and in-patients of some hospital in Qingdao from January 2005 to December 2008. According to the recommendation of NCCLS, antibiotic resistance analysis of 11 kinds of antibiotic to the isolated 231 Streptococcus pneumoniae by micro-agar dilution method, and analysis resistance trends and age differences. Results The results showed that the rate of Streptococcus pneumoniae not sensitive to penicillin is 23. 38% (PRSP: 9.52% , PISP: 13. 85% ) , resistant to cefotaxime is 9. 96% (23/231), resistant to amoxicillin is 12. 55% , resistant to erythromycin is 90. 48% (209/231). PRSP rate of patients younger than 14 years of age 27. 91% (12/43), significantly higher than that of the PRSP rate of adults 5. 38% (10/186). Conclusion The rate of resistant to penicillin Streptococcus pneumoniae increased significantly from 2004, and an increasing trend year by year, the resistance of Streptococcus pneumoniae is also a rising trend year by year. For patients infected low penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae in this region, cefotaxime, amoxicillin are preferred drugs.
3.Antibiotic-neutralized Culture Bottle Applied by Manual Operations and Its Value
Weiqing HUANG ; Liping YAN ; Zuqiang HOU ; Yanhui MA ; Xiuai JIANG
Chinese Journal of Nosocomiology 2006;0(05):-
OBJECTIVE To study and evaluate the value of the antibiotic-neutralized culture bottle applied by manual operations.METHODS A total of 711 blood samples were collected from clinical high fever patients in Qingdao Central Hospital from 2002 to 2005.To compare the bacteria detected rates,cultural time and bacteria types in 399 samples cultured in manual blood-culture bottles with those in 312 samples cultured in antibiotic-neutralized culture bottles applied by manual operations.RESULTS The bacteria detected rates were 10.28% in manual blood-culture bottles and 20.83% in antibiotic-neutralized culture bottles applied by manual operations.There was significant difference between both of them(P72h were no statistical difference between manual blood-culture bottles and antibiotic-neutralized culture bottles.Twenty species of bacteria were detected in manual blood-culture bottles and 29 species of bacteria in antibiotic-neutralized culture bottles applied by manual operations.CONCLUSIONS The bacteria detected rate and species of bacteria were more obviously raised in antibiotic-neutralized culture bottles applied by manual operations than in manual blood-culture bottles.