1.Comparison of four kinds of internal fixation for acetabular fracture of the lower anterior column: a finite element analysis
Yuanyuan DAI ; Ying ZHANG ; Yuanjun XIA ; Huibin XIE ; Xiaoze GUO ; Changrong ZHU
Chinese Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 2016;18(8):702-707
Objective To compare the biomechanical stability of 4 internal fixations in treatment of acetabular fracture of the lower anterior column through finite element analysis.Methods One normal adult male pelvis was subjected to 0.7mm thin-section CT scanning and 379 CT pictures were obtained.Finite element modeling software was used to establish internal fixation models for acetabular fracture of the lower anterior column,including lag screws (A),anterior column reconstruction plate (B),subcutaneous plate not crossing the pubic symphysis (C) and subcutaneous plate crossing the pubic symphysis (D).Finite element analysis was carried out to compare the biomechanical differences among the 4 internal fixation models which were subjected to the same loading conditions at both standing and sitting positions.Results At standing and sitting positions,the maximum displacement and the mean node displacement of fracture lines were the greatest in group A (0.558 mm and 0.462 ±0.092 mm at standing;0.634 mm and 0.473 ±0.108 mm at sitting),the smallest in group D (0.512 mm and 0.425 ±0.083 mm at standing;0.031 mm and 0.025 ± 0.004 mm at sitting),and in between in group B (0.513 mm and 0.432 ±0.085 mm at standing;0.630 mm and 0.466 ± 0.109 mm at sitting) and in group C (0.514 mm and 0.433 ± 0.085 mm at standing;0.627 mm and 0.464 ± 0.107 mm at sitting).At both standing and sitting positions,the maximum stress at the fracture line was the greatest in group D (10.519 MPa and 24.879 MPa),the smallest in group A (3.254 MPa and 8.954 MPa),and in between in group B (4.873 MPa and 9.431 MPa) and in group C (4.384 MPa and 10.128 MPa).Conclusions In treatment of acetabular fracture of the lower anterior column,subcutaneous plate crossing the pubic symphysis may result in the greatest biomechanical stability,lag screws the smallest biomechanical stability,and anterior column reconstruction plate and subcutaneous plate not crossing the pubic symphysis the moderate biomechanical stability.
2.The application of computer aided rapid prototyping technology in diagnosis and treatment of complicated pelvic fractures
Baofeng LI ; Ying ZHANG ; Huibin XIE ; Xiaoze GUO ; Fei WANG ; Hong. XIA
The Journal of Practical Medicine 2015;31(16):2714-2717
Objective To evaluate the value of computer aided rapid prototyping technology in diagnosis and treatment of complicated pelvic fractures. Methods Twenty-two patients of complicated pelvic fractures were examined by thin-slice CT to gain two-dimensional data of the pelvis. Three-dimensional reconstructions of anatomical models were accomplished by computer aided technology. By rapid prototyping technology , the pelvic models were rendered , by which diagnosis and typing of pelvic fractures were finalized for operation project , mimic operation and guiding the operation. Results Three-dimensional reconstruction images and rapid prototyping pelvic models were extremely similar to what doctors saw in the operations. Preoperative mimic operation shortened the time of operation and reduced the volume of bleeding in the operation. All 22 cases were available for review in follow-up period of 6 ~ 24 months. Patients could sit up in 2 ~ 4 weeks after surgery , and walk with a crutch 6 weeks later. Pelvic fractures reductions were good in 22 cases. According to the Majeed's functional criteria , 16 patients were judged excellent and 3 patients were good. The excellent and good rate was 86.4%. Conclusions Computer aided rapid prototyping technology can overall, direct-viewing, and exactly display the three-dimensional shape of pelvis and spatial relation of anatomic structures. It is important for definite clinic diagnosis , typing and treatment.
3.Structure basis for the unique specificity of medaka enteropeptidase light chain.
Jin XU ; Shi HU ; Xiaoze WANG ; Ziye ZHAO ; Xinyue ZHANG ; Hao WANG ; Dapeng ZHANG ; Yajun GUO
Protein & Cell 2014;5(3):178-181