1.Application of tacrolimus in 862 renal transplantation recipients
Lixin YU ; Xiaoyou LIU ; Shaojie FU
Chinese Journal of Organ Transplantation 2005;0(12):-
0. 05) in a year, respectively. Conclusions FK506 was an effective and high safe basic immunosuppressant in long-term application in renal transplant recipients, especially suitable for children and old recipients. To those patients with DM, FK506 had almost the same influence on the glucose metabolism as the CsA.
2.Effect of laparoscopic visual reality training on the basic technical skill of laparoscopic operation
Huan QI ; Jiang TAN ; Qingfeng DU ; Xiaoyou FU
Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research 2006;0(07):-
Objective To explore the outcome of laparoscopic visual reality training in participants with different clinical experiences. Methods Clinical training doctors,advanced study doctors,intern doctors practiced peg transfer,cutting and making saturation and instrumental tie by using laparoscopic visual reality training,then made statistical analysis. The participants were trained for 2 weeks,90 min per day. The scores before and after the training in the 3 groups were recorded and compared. Results Before the training,the level of intern doctors on peg transfer、cutting and making saturation and instrumental tie was lower than the level of clinical training doctors and advanced study doctors(P0.05). The level of three different operators after training was obviously higher than that of themselves before training(P
3.Significance of quantitative detecting perforin mRNA expression in the diagnosis of rat acute rejection
Lixin YU ; Ruotong HUANG ; Xiaoyou LIU ; Shaojie FU ; Xuyong SUN ; Qian YUAN
Chinese Journal of Urology 2006;0(S1):-
Objective To quantitatively detect intragraft and peripheral blood monocyte cells (PBMCs) perforin mRNA,and analysis the relationship between acute rejection and perforin mRNA. Methods In the allograft group Wistar and male SD rats were used as donors and recipients.SD rats served as donors and recipients in the isograft group.The graft specimens were harvested 5 days postoperatively.They were examined histologically after sectioning and staining with hematoxylin and eosin,Masson’s trichrome, periodic acid-Schiff reagent and periodic acidsilver metheramine.And then the fluorescent quantitative PCR was employed to measure the intragraft and PBMCs expression level of perforin mRNA. Results The histological scores in allograft and isograft kidney samples were 2~5 (3.43?0.98) and 0~1 (0.71?0.49)(P
4.Establishment of acute rejection model of rat kidney transplantation
Xiaoyou LIU ; Lixin YU ; Shaojie FU ; Xuyong SUN ; Qian YUAN ; Haiyun XIONG
Chinese Journal of Urology 2001;0(11):-
0.05). Conclusions When SD rats serve as both donors and recipients,the rejection is mild because of their good tissue compatibility.The rejection of Wistar-SD rat kidney transplants is rapid and severe, which can serve as good animal model of acute rejection.
5.Impact of recipient/donor killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptor gene mismatch on outcomes of renal transplant.
Xiaoyou LIU ; Zhengyao JIANG ; Min LUO ; Lulu XIAO ; Shaojie FU
Journal of Southern Medical University 2014;34(12):1763-1767
OBJECTIVETo explore the impact of killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptor (KIR) gene mismatch on the outcomes of renal transplantation.
METHODSWe collected the data from 111 donor-recipient pairs of kidney transplant and analyzed the status of KIR gene matching, acute rejection (AR), and 1-year and 3-year survival of the recipients who were followed continuously for over 37 months.
RESULTSSeventeen KIR genes were expressed in both recipient and donor groups, and the frequency of KIR3DS1 was significantly higher in the recipients than in the donors (38.75% vs 24.66%, OR=2.17, χ² = 3.94, P<0.05). The average rate of donor-recipient KIR matching was 82.53%. The donor-recipient KIR2DS1 matching rate was significantly higher in AR group than in no-AR group (85.00% vs 54.95%, χ² = 6.19, P<0.05). The rate of donor-recipient KIR AB-AB genotype was significantly higher in AR group than in no-AR group (33.33% vs 8.00%, P<0.05). The 1- and 3-year survival rates was 94.59% and 82.88% in these recipients, respectively. The frequency of donor KIR-AB genotpye was significantly higher in recipients with poor outcomes (57.89% vs 29.63%, χ² = 8.19, P<0.05); the frequency of both donor and recipient KIR-AB genotype was also significantly higher in recipients with poor prognoses (36.84% vs 9.78%, χ² = 14.87, P<0.05).
CONCLUSIONSKIR3DS1 may be the susceptible gene associated with uremia. A KIR-AB genotype of either the donor or the recipient can increase the risk of AR and reduce the 1- and 3-year survival rate. This finding can be of ethically importance in choosing a living related donor.
Genotype ; Humans ; Kidney Transplantation ; Receptors, KIR ; genetics ; Survival Rate ; Tissue Donors ; Treatment Outcome
6.Impact of recipient/donor killer cell immunoglobulin- like receptor gene mismatch on outcomes of renal transplant
Xiaoyou LIU ; Zhengyao JIANG ; Min LUO ; Lulu XIAO ; Shaojie FU
Journal of Southern Medical University 2014;(12):1763-1767
Objective To explore the impact of killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptor (KIR) gene mismatch on the outcomes of renal transplantation. Methods We collected the data from 111 donor-recipient pairs of kidney transplant and analyzed the status of KIR gene matching, acute rejection (AR), and 1-year and 3-year survival of the recipients who were followed continuously for over 37 months. Results Seventeen KIR genes were expressed in both recipient and donor groups, and the frequency of KIR3DS1 was significantly higher in the recipients than in the donors (38.75% vs 24.66%, OR=2.17, χ2=3.94, P<0.05). The average rate of donor-recipient KIR matching was 82.53%. The donor-recipient KIR2DS1 matching rate was significantly higher in AR group than in no-AR group (85.00%vs 54.95%,χ2=6.19, P<0.05). The rate of donor-recipient KIR AB-AB genotype was significantly higher in AR group than in no-AR group (33.33%vs 8.00%, P<0.05). The 1-and 3-year survival rates was 94.59% and 82.88% in these recipients, respectively. The frequency of donor KIR-AB genotpye was significantly higher in recipients with poor outcomes (57.89%vs 29.63%,χ2=8.19, P<0.05);the frequency of both donor and recipient KIR-AB genotype was also significantly higher in recipients with poor prognoses (36.84% vs 9.78%, χ2=14.87, P<0.05). Conclusions KIR3DS1 may be the susceptible gene associated with uremia. A KIR-AB genotype of either the donor or the recipient can increase the risk of AR and reduce the 1- and 3-year survival rate. This finding can be of ethically importance in choosing a living related donor.
7.Impact of recipient/donor killer cell immunoglobulin- like receptor gene mismatch on outcomes of renal transplant
Xiaoyou LIU ; Zhengyao JIANG ; Min LUO ; Lulu XIAO ; Shaojie FU
Journal of Southern Medical University 2014;(12):1763-1767
Objective To explore the impact of killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptor (KIR) gene mismatch on the outcomes of renal transplantation. Methods We collected the data from 111 donor-recipient pairs of kidney transplant and analyzed the status of KIR gene matching, acute rejection (AR), and 1-year and 3-year survival of the recipients who were followed continuously for over 37 months. Results Seventeen KIR genes were expressed in both recipient and donor groups, and the frequency of KIR3DS1 was significantly higher in the recipients than in the donors (38.75% vs 24.66%, OR=2.17, χ2=3.94, P<0.05). The average rate of donor-recipient KIR matching was 82.53%. The donor-recipient KIR2DS1 matching rate was significantly higher in AR group than in no-AR group (85.00%vs 54.95%,χ2=6.19, P<0.05). The rate of donor-recipient KIR AB-AB genotype was significantly higher in AR group than in no-AR group (33.33%vs 8.00%, P<0.05). The 1-and 3-year survival rates was 94.59% and 82.88% in these recipients, respectively. The frequency of donor KIR-AB genotpye was significantly higher in recipients with poor outcomes (57.89%vs 29.63%,χ2=8.19, P<0.05);the frequency of both donor and recipient KIR-AB genotype was also significantly higher in recipients with poor prognoses (36.84% vs 9.78%, χ2=14.87, P<0.05). Conclusions KIR3DS1 may be the susceptible gene associated with uremia. A KIR-AB genotype of either the donor or the recipient can increase the risk of AR and reduce the 1- and 3-year survival rate. This finding can be of ethically importance in choosing a living related donor.