1.Prognostic impact of GSTA1 polymorphisms on breast cancer patients treated with cyclophosphamide-based adjuvant chemotherapy
Lihua LI ; Zijian GUO ; Xiaosheng HANG ; Xike ZHOU ; Jie HE ; Mingxu SONG ; Zhihui LIU
Chinese Journal of Laboratory Medicine 2011;34(4):309-314
Objective To investigate the association between the genetic polymorphisms in GSTA1 and the clinical outcome of breast cancer patients treated with cyclophosphamide-based adjuvant chemotherapy. Methods A total of 137 breast cancer patients receiving cyclophosphamide-based adjuvant chemotherapy were recruited ( 124 cases with infiltrative ductal carcinoma, 5 cases with infiltrative lobular carcinoma and 8 cases with other histological types). PCR-LDR method was used to detect the genotypes of GSTA1. Survival curves were generated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and verified by the log-rank test. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to estimate the prognostic factors in multivariate analysis. Results Of the 137 breast cancer patients, the genotypic frequencies of the GSTA1 * A/* A,* A/* B and * B/* B were 67.2% ( 92/137 ), 31.4% ( 43/137 ) and 1.5% ( 2/137 ), respectively. No significant differences were found between the genotypic frequencies and groups categorization according to age, stage, lymph node metastasis, ER or PR status (x2 = 0. 722,1. 967, 3. 303, 0. 226 and 0. 709, all P >0. 05 ) ;through Fisher exact test, also no significant differences were found between the genotypic frequencies and group categorization according to tumor size, histological types and grading ( all P > 0. 05 ) . The recurrence rates in patients with GSTA1 * A/* A and * A/* B or * B/* B genotypes were 47. 8% (44/92) and 31.1% ( 14/45 ), respectively, and the mortality rates were 22. 8% ( 21/92 ) and 17. 8% ( 8/45 ),respectively. Patients with GSTA1 * A/* B and * B/* B genotypes were significantly associated with reduced hazard of relapse (x2 =18.723, P<0. 01)and mortality (x2 =7.352, P<0.01), compared to cases with the common * A/* A genotypes, according to Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and log-rank test. Moreover,Cox multivariate analysis showed that GSTA1 polymorphisms appeared to be an independent risk factor for recurrence-free survival ( OR =0. 222, 95% CI:0. 108-0. 458, P <0. 01 ) and overall survival ( OR =0. 362,95% CI:0. 145-0. 902, P < 0. 05 ). Conclusion These data indicate that GSTA1 polymorphism may be a potential prognostic factor for recurrence-free survival and overall survival in breast cancer patients treated with cyclophosphamide-based adjuvant chemotherapy.
2.Randomized clinical study comparing gemcitabine and oxaliplatin versus gemcitabine and cisplatin for advanced non-small cell lung cancer in elderly patients.
Qing SUN ; Jun HUA ; Xiaosheng HANG ; Yongjie MAO ; Qi WANG
Chinese Journal of Lung Cancer 2005;8(5):451-453
BACKGROUNDIn most instances, advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is treated with primary chemotherapy. Many chemotherapy regimens can palliate cancer-related symptoms. Quality of life and modestly improved survival are very important especially for elderly patients. This clinical trial is to compare the efficacy and toxicity of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (GO) versus gemcitabine and cisplatin (GP) in treatment of advanced NSCLC in elderly patients.
METHODSA total of 42 patients with advanced NSCLC diagnosed pathologically were randomly divided into GO group (gemcitabine 1000mg/m² on days 1, 8; oxaliplatin 65mg/m² on days 1, 8) and GP group (gemcitabine 1000mg/m² on days 1, 8; cisplatin 30mg/m² on days 1-3), 28 days as a cycle. All patients received two cycles of chemotherapy at least.
RESULTSIn GO group, the response rate was 55.0%. Whereas in GP group, the response rate was 40.9%. The difference in response rate was not statistically significant between the two groups (P > 0.05). The median survival duration was 11.2 months in GO group and 11.8 months in GP group. The 1-year survival rate was 45% in GO group and 50% in GP group (P > 0.05). The main toxicities were well tolerated. Leukopenia and nausea/vomiting at grade III+IV, and alopecia and impaired renal function at grade I+II occurred more frequently in GP group than those in GO group (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONSBoth of the two regimens are feasible, well-tolerated and effective in treatment of advanced NSCLC in elderly patients. GO regimen may be safer than GP regimen.