1.Human errors in medical practice and the prevention
Dachun ZHOU ; Xiaonin CHEN ; Cailian ZHAO ; Xiujun CAI
Chinese Journal of Hospital Administration 2009;25(4):231-234
Human errors are errors found in planning or implementation, and those found in medical practice are often major causes of mishaps.To name a few, wrong-site surgery, medication error, wrong treatment, and inadvertent equipment operation.Errors of this category can be prevented by learning from experiences and achievement worldwide.Preventive measures include those taken in human aspect and system aspect, reinforced education and training, process optimization, and hardware redesign.These measures can be aided by multiple safety steps in risky technical operations, in an effort to break the accident chain.For example, pre-operative surgical site marking, multi-department co-operated patient identification, bar-coded medication delivery, read-back during verbal communication, and observation of clinical pathway.Continuous quality improvement may be achieved when both the management and staff see medical errors in the correct sense, and frontline staff are willing to report their errors.
2.A comparison between endoscopic-assisted second branchial cleft cyst resection via retroauricular hairline approach and conventional second branchial cleft cyst resection.
Liangsi CHEN ; Xiaoming HUANG ; Xiaonin LOU ; Siyi XHANG ; Xinhan SONG ; Zhongming LU ; Mimi XU
Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery 2013;27(22):1258-1262
OBJECTIVE:
To assess the feasibility, risks and advantages of endoscope-assisted second branchial cleft cyst (SBCC) resection via the retroauricular hairline approach (RHA) by comparing with conventional trans cervical approach.
METHOD:
Using prospective clinical controlled study, in twenty five patients with SBCC, 13 cases underwent endoscope-assisted resection via the RHA, 12 cases underwent conventional transcervical approach resection. Preoperatively, the sizes, locations and adjacency of all lesions were evaluated by ultrasonography, CT or MRI. Pathologic diagnoses of all cases were identified as SBCC using fine needle aspiration biopsy. Two groups were compared at length of incision, operation time, bleeding, incision cosmetic result, complication etc.
RESULT:
All 25 operations were successfully performed. Length of incision and operation time in endoscopic group were significantly longer than that of the transcervical group (P < 0.05). After three months, the mean subjective satisfaction score of incision scar in the endoscopic group was significantly higher than that of transcervical group (P < 0.01). In endoscopic group, 1 cases (7.7%) with temporary numbness of earlobe and 1 case (7.7%) with a darkened color change of the flap margin at the incision angle were found postoperatively. However, they were recovered within 1 month. All the 25 patients were disease free with a follow-up from 18 to 36 months (median follow-up: 26 months).
CONCLUSION
Endoscope-assisted SBCC resection via RHA is feasible and safe for the treatment of SBCC. In comparison with the transcervical approach, this method can provide an invisible incision and better cosmetic re suits without significant complications.
Adolescent
;
Adult
;
Branchioma
;
surgery
;
Endoscopy
;
Female
;
Head and Neck Neoplasms
;
surgery
;
Humans
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Prospective Studies
;
Treatment Outcome
;
Young Adult