1.Study on quality control methods of Fuzheng Xiaoji capsule based on biological detection method
Liyan LI ; Lingqing FANG ; Xiaoluan XU ; Fangting CHEN
Chinese Journal of Biochemical Pharmaceutics 2017;37(5):28-31
Objective To establish biological detection method for Fuzheng Xiaoji capsule.MethodsTaken Radix astragali,Hedyotis diffusa Willd, Fructus Polygoni orientalis and rhubarb in Fuzheng Xiaoji capsule as targets, the antimicrobial activity of the single fried mixture of Radix astragali,Hedyotis diffusa Willd,Fructus Polygoni orientalis and rhubarb to 4 kinds of standard strains(Staphylococcus aureus, Salmonella, Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis) were inspected.The standard curve by susceptible strains of the inhibition zone diameter and logarithm of the concentration was established,and this test also determined the biological potency of different batches of Fuzheng Xiaoji capsule according to the dose-response curve.ResultsThe single fried mixture of Radix astragali,Hedyotis diffusa Willd, Fructus Polygoni orientalis and rhubarb have strong anti-bacterial effect to the above four standard strains.There was a good linear relationship between logarithmic dose and response effect when the concentration in the range of 0.029-0.136g/mL(r=0.9583).ConclusionBiological potency detection method can be combined with traditional analysis methods to control the quality of Fuzheng Xiaoji capsule.
2.Analysis of the whole genome characteristics of influenza A (H3N2) virus in Wuxi city from 2022 to 2023
Yong XU ; Rui WANG ; Chun′an YU ; Jing BAO ; Qi ZHOU ; Yong XIAO ; Hong LI ; Xiaoluan SHI ; Guangyuan MA
Chinese Journal of Experimental and Clinical Virology 2024;38(4):454-463
Objective:To understand the whole genome and genetic evolution characteristics of the first epidemic influenza A (H3N2) viruses in Wuxi from 2022-2023.Methods:Real time fluorescence quantitative RT-PCR method was used to perform typing on respiratory samples of influenza cases. Virus isolation was performed on samples with positive nucleic acid of subtype A H3N2 influenza virus detected. After cell culture, nucleic acid was extracted from strains with red blood cell agglutination test (HA) ≥ 1∶8, whole genome sequence was amplified, library was constructed, and computer sequencing was performed using MiSeq sequencer. Using NC_007366.1 as reference strain, the data were analyzed using CLC Genomics Workbench (Version 23) software. The phylogenetic tree was constructed using MEGA 7.0 software, and the N-glycosylation sites were predicted by NetNGlyc 1.0 Server software.Results:The nucleotide homology and amino acid homology among 35 strains of influenza A H3N2 virus from 2022 to 2023 were 96.4%-100% and 95.2%-100%, respectively. The 16 epidemic strains in 2022 belong to the 3C.2a1b.2a.1a evolutionary branch, while the 19 epidemic strains in 2023 belong to the 3C.2a1b.2a.2a.3a.1 evolutionary branch. There are 7 differences in the nucleotide sequence of the HA gene between the 2022 epidemic strain and the corresponding vaccine strain, sharing 15 mutation sites; There are 28 differences in the nucleotide sequence of the HA gene between the 2023 epidemic strain and the corresponding vaccine strain, sharing 17 mutation sites. The HA genes of 35 epidemic strains all lack N-glycosylation site 61: NSS, while in 2023, the HA genes of 19 epidemic strains added N-glycosylation site 110: NSS.Conclusions:The HA and NA genes of influenza A H3N2 virus in 2022 and 2023 belong to two evolutionary branches, respectively, and both show specific amino acid site changes compared to the corresponding vaccine strains. The antigen matching between the 2022 epidemic strain and the vaccine strain is relatively good, while there is a risk of low antigen matching between the 2023 epidemic strain and the vaccine strain.
3.Prognosis of patients with a single compared to multiple colorectal cancer liver metastases after hepatic resection
Da XU ; Xiaoluan YAN ; Jiaming LIU ; Juan LI ; Baocai XING
Chinese Journal of Hepatobiliary Surgery 2020;26(7):503-507
Objective:To compare the prognosis of patients with a single compared to multiple colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM) after hepatectomy.Methods:The clinical data of 490 patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases who underwent hepatectomy at Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Ⅰ, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute from January 2006 to December 2016 were retrospectively studied. There were 314 males and 176 females. The median age was 58 years (range 21 to 83 years). There were 200 patients in the single liver metastasis group and 290 patients in the multiple liver metastases group. The tumor recurrence and survival outcomes on follow-up were analyzed. Survival curves were plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method. Both overall survival and disease-free survival between two groups were compared by the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to analyze independent risk factors of overall survival.Results:The 1-, 3-, 5-, 10-year overall survival rates for the single versus the multiple liver metastases groups were 92.5%, 58.6%, 51.0%, 38.8% versus 90.7%, 53.2%, 41.1%, 29.9%. The differences were significant ( P<0.05). The disease-free survival was also significantly better in the single than the multiple groups ( P<0.05). Cox multivariate analysis showed that right-sided primary colonic tumor, preoperative carbohydrate antigen 19-9 level ≥50 U/ml, and RAS mutant were independent factors influencing survival in patients with single liver metastasis; while primary colonic tumor N 1-2, liver metastases diameter ≥5 cm, and RAS mutant were independent factors influencing survival in patients with multiple tumors. If the three independent factors affecting overall survival of patients with multiple liver metastases were assigned 1 point for each factor, the number of patients with scores of 0, 1, 2, and 3 were 50, 145, 84, and 11, respectively. The long-term survival of patients with a low score (0, 1) was similar to those with a single liver metastasis (both P>0.05). However, patients with a high score (2, 3) showed significantly worse long-term survival when compared with patients with a single liver metastasis (both P<0.05). Conclusions:The prognosis of patients with single colorectal liver metastasis was better than those with multiple liver metastases after hepatectomy. For patients with multiple liver metastases with fewer associated risk factors, surgical resection could still result in long-term survival outcomes which were comparable to those patients with a single liver metastasis.