2.Effect of Piribedil Combined with Madopar in the Treatment of Parkinson’ s Disease
China Pharmacist 2014;(5):806-807
Objective:To observe the clinical effect of piribedil and madopar on Parkinson's disease ( PD) . Methods:Totally 58 patients with PD were divided randomly into the treatment group (29 cases) and the control group (29 cases). Piribedil and madopar were used in the treatment group, while only madopar was applied in the control group. Therapeutic effect of both groups was evaluated by UPDRS at the end of 6 courses. Results:The decrease of UPDRS after the remedy in the treatment group was more significant than that in the control group (P<0. 05), and the total effective rate in the treatment group(89. 7%) was significantly higher than that in the control group(65. 5%)(P<0. 05). Conclusion:The clinical effect of piribedil combined with madopar on PD is superior to that of madopar alone, therefore, the combination use is a useful method in the treatment of PD with the value of popularization and applica-tion.
3.A preliminary study on the correlation between dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and blood stasis syndrome in breast cancer
Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy 2013;20(15):2308-2310
Objective To observe the correlation of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) appearances and blood stasis syndrome in breast cancer.Methods The clinical data of 100 patients with breast cancer confirmed by operation and pathology were retrospectively reviewed.70 cases without blood stasis syndrome,30 cases with blood stasis syndrome.All the cases underwent MRI using PHILIPS Achieva 1.5T magnetic resonance scanner before surgery.Results In no blood stasis group,76.67% inhomogeneous enhancement,edge enhancement 43.33%,spiculation proportion 50.00%,which were significantly lower than those in the blood stasis group (88.57%,75.71%,83.33%).The mass ratio of the shape between the two groups had no significant difference (P > 0.05).No blood stasis group and stagnation of blood group TIC curve was mainly type Ⅳ,type Ⅲ curve ratio of no blood stasis group (3.33%) was significantly lower than blood stasis group(12.86%) (P <0.01).In blood stasis group,Emax/1 and tumor size were higher than without blood stasis syndrome group.the percentage of V per minute outflow of blood stasis group was lower than without blood stasis syndrome group.Conclusion The clinician should make a preliminary evaluation of the prognosis before operation,in order to timely and reasonably choose the method of integrated traditional Chinese and Western medicine.
10.Comparison of retrograde intra-renal surgery and percutaneous nephrolithotomy in treating renal pelvic stone less than 1 .5 centimeters
Journal of Clinical Surgery 2015;(2):113-115
Objective To explore the best minimal invasive method in treating renal pelvic stones less than 1.5 cm.Methods A total of 90 patients with renal pelvic stone less than 1.5 cm were enrolled, including 47 cases of retrograde intrarenal surgery(RIRS)by rigid and flexible ureteroscopy with holmium laser lithotripsy,and 43 cases of percutaneous nephrolithotomy(PCNL)by holmium laser lithotripsy.Opera-tion time,stonefree rate(SFR),hospitalization,and complications were analyzed for comparison.Results The average sizes of stone in the RIRS group and PCNL group were 1.2 cm(range 1.0 ~1.5 cm)and 1.3 cm (1.0 ~1.5 cm),respectively.In the RIRS group,45(95.74%)patients out of 47 had complete clearance and 32 patients needed combination of flexible ureteroscopy to fragmentate the stones falling into the renal calices.The operation time was 44 min(range 27 ~70 min)with postoperative fever in 2 cases.The decrea-sing in hemoglobin and hematocrit was(0.18 ±0.06)g/L and 0.11%,respectively.No major complication was recorded.In PCNL group,the mean operation time was 70min(range 45 ~90 min)with a stone-free rate of 95.35%(41 /43).The decreasing in hemoglobin and hematocrit was(17.25 ±6.70)g/L and 5. 62%,respectively.The complications in PCNL group were postoperative fever in two cases and bleeding in two cases.Conclusion RIRS has the advantages of natural orifice endoscopic surgery in shortening opera-tion time,reducing blood transfusion requirements,and decreasing postoperative complications.For renal pelvic stone less than 1.5 cm,RIRS can be the primary choice.