Objective:To investigate the clinical value of two kinds of treatment methods of selective operation and emergency surgery after implantation of stents.Methods:Methods the clinical data of 90 patients with obstructive colorectal cancer were analyzed retrospectively.Temporary placement of metal stents in 30 cases,Elective surgical treatment (stent group);60 cases of emergency operation (emergency operation group).Comparing stent group and a emergency surgical resection and self-agreement,operation time,postoperative ventilation time,complications and hospitalization mortality indicators.Results:stent group one stage resection self-agreement (96.67％) were significantly higher than those of emergency surgery group(56.67％,P＜ 0.001).Postoperative complications(6.67％) stent group was obviously lower emergency surgical group(26.67％,P＜ 0 05).Support group hospitalization mortality compared with emergency surgery group,The difference was not statistically significant(P＞0.05).Support the operative time,postoperative ventilation time (156.13 ± 49.79) min and (3.60 ± 1.40) d,respectively,significantly lower than the emergency treatment (P＜ 0.05).Conclusion:Implant stents can rapidly and effectively alleviate symptoms of obstructive co orecta cancer After placing stents undergoing elective surgery compared with emergency surgery can increase the resection and self-agreement,reduce the complications and can be used as aeffect ve relieve obstructive colorectal cancer treatment.