1.Staged management of missed lisfranc injuries:A report of short-term results
Pin FENG ; Jia LI ; Xiangyu OUYANG ; Feng GAO ; Hui ZHANG
International Journal of Surgery 2016;43(11):745-749
Objective To analyze the clinical and radiographic outcomes of staged reduction and fixation in a consecutive series of patients with the old Lisfranc injuries. Methods Fifty patients (16 feet) with Lisfranc injuries were treated with staged reduction. Mean duration between injury and surgery was 4. 8month ( 3 to 8 month) . In first stage an external fixator was applied across the Lisfranc joint and distraction was done at 1 milliliter per day to 2 milliliter per day. In the second staged the ORIF ( open reduction and internal fixation) was doneand we were able to reduce all the fractures and dislocations. Extra-Articular screws and staple fixation were used for fixation. We compared categorical variables using Fisher’ s exact test and continuous variables using paired t-test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results All patients were followed up 1 to 3 years ( mean 2. 2 years) in the clinic. The visual analogue scale score averaged 3. 1 points at the final follow-up, the average AOFAS scores for these patients were 55. 8 points ( range, 43 to 98 points), with a significant increase than before surgery ( P=0. 001). The mean duration between two surgeries was 3. 2 weeks (range 2. 5-4. 5 weeks). Anatomic reduction was obtained in all 15 patients. At the last follow-up, 2 patients had lost reduction. Posttraumatic osteoarthritis was observed in 5 patients, and all of them were scheduled for arthrodesis because of persistent pain. Conclusions The study have displayed that staged reduction and Extra-Articular fixation should be considered for old Lisfranc injuries with a good reduction, the firm stability, low risk of intraoperative fracture. The short-term effectiveness is good, but the long-term effectiveness needs further follow-up.
2.InfLuence of famiLy integrated care on the intestinaL microbiome of preterm infants in the neonataL intensive care unit
Zhicui OUYANG ; Xiangyu GAO ; Juan DU ; Ying LI ; Xing ZHU ; Mingyan HEI
Chinese Journal of Pediatrics 2019;57(4):265-271
Objective To investigate the infLuence of famiLy integrated care (FICare) on the intestinaL microbiome of preterm infants in neonataL intensive care unit (NICU). Methods This was a prospective observationaL piLot study. A totaL of 44 preterm infants (23 boys, 52%) admitted to NICU of the Third Xiangya HospitaL of CentraL South University from JuLy, 2015 to June, 2017 were enroLLed and divided into FICare, non?FICare groups. TotaLLy 20 term infants (11 boys, 55%) were enroLLed into controL group, who were sent to the Pediatric HeaLthcare CLinic for reguLar heaLth check on postnataL 28-31 days. ALL infants were free from probiotics after birth and on fuLL enteraL feeding. CLinicaL data of aLL infants were coLLected. Two fresh stooL specimens of infants in FICare group were coLLected after 2 weeks of FICare impLementation, without use of antibiotics during the prior 1 week. StooL specimens of infants in non?FICare group were coLLected at the meantime;whiLe for the infants in controL group, stooL sampLes were coLLected at 4 weeks of age. ALL specimens were stored in-80℃freezer, subsequentLy investigated by 16 S rRNA sequencing. The resuLts were fiLtered by paired?end reads software based on RNA overLapping?spLicing and tags caLcuLation. OperationaL taxonomic units (OTU) were anaLyzed for intestinaL microbiome richness. IntestinaL microbiome diversity was measured with Shannon index. One?way ANOVA or KruskaL?WaLLis H statistic anaLysis or Chi?square test was used for statisticaL anaLysis. ResuLts There were no significant differences among FICare, non?FICare and controL groups in maLe proportion (52% (11/21) vs. 52% (12/23) vs. 55% (11/20), χ2=0.041, P=0.980), in?born ratio (90% (19/21) vs. 87% (20/23) vs. 85% (17/20), χ2=0.000, P=1.000), and percentage of infants with Apgar scores<7 at 5 minutes after birth (14% (3/21) vs. 9% (2/23) vs. 5% (1/20), χ2=0.120, P=0.729). SimiLarLy, no significant differences were found between FICare and non?FICare groups in terms of gestationaL age ((29.7±1.8) vs. (29.9±1.7) weeks, t=0.378, P=0.707), birth weight ((1 266±310) vs. (1 326 ± 318) g, t=0.631, P=0.531), median age of initiating feeds (4 vs. 4 days oLd, Z=0.666, P=0.505), and median age of achieving feeding voLume of 120 mL/(kg·d) (13 vs. 11 days oLd, Z=1.014, P=0.310). However, the breast?feeding rate in FICare group (18/21, 86%) was significantLy higher than that in non?FICare group (8/23, 35%) (t=11.780, P=0.001). The medium Shannon index was 0.72 (0.27,2.66), 0.61 (0.18,1.83), and 0.52 (0.08,1.71) in controL, FICare, and non?FICare groups, respectiveLy, without significant difference (H=1.823, P=0.402). The domain fLora was LactobaciLLus Firmicutes in aLL three groups, which was of the highest percentage in FICare group (71.6±5.4) %, foLLowed by controL group (65.4±6.6) % and non?FICare group (55.6±8.8) %, with a significant difference (F=27.919, P=0.000). ConcLusions FICare can improve the richness and diversity of intestinaL microbiome, stimuLate the estabLishment of fLora cLose to those of normaL breast?feeding infants in preemies in NICU,making its estabLishment being more simiLar to normaL term breast?feeding infants. This effect might be caused by the increased skin?to?skin contact and increased fresh breast?miLk?feeding in FICare.