1.Nutritional risk and nutritional support in gastrointestinal cancer surgical patients
Yu FANG ; Xiaowei XIN ; Yanli WANG ; Rui YANG ; Xianglong ZONG ; Xiaotian ZHANG
Chinese Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2011;19(6):368-371
ObjectiveTo investigate the prevalence of nutritional risk and perioperative nutritional support status in the gastrointestinal cancer surgical patients.Methods Adult inpatients from the gastrointestinal cancer surgery department of our hospital were consecutively enrolled from May to September 2010.Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 ( NRS 2002) was performed at admission,and data of the nutritional support and complications during hospitalization were collected.The relationship between nutritional risk and postoperative complications was analyzed.ResultsA total of 195 patients were eligible.At admission,43.6% (85/195) patients were at riskOf the patients at risk,totally 11.7% (10/85) patients received preoperative nutritional support,and 100% (85/85) patients received postoperative nutritional support; of the patients not at risk,no patients received preoperative nutritional support,and 84.5% (93/110) patients received postoperative nutritional support.The overall rates of postoperative complications were 19.1% ( 13/68 ) in the patients at risk while 7.1% (9/127 )in the patients not at risk ( P =0.02).ConclusionsNutritional risk in gastrointestinal cancer surgical patients was high.The application of nutritional support was inappropriate in these patients.The nutritional risk is associated with higher postoperative complications.Dissemination of evidence-based guidelines should be enhanced.
2.The clinical value of using a four-point method to measure joint angles
Wenchao YI ; Jianping HU ; Jianan LI ; Xianglong JIANG ; Min ZONG ; Xihu MU ; Hong JIN ; Zhengen ZHAO
Chinese Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2011;33(6):425-430
Objective To study the clinical value of using a four-point method (FP) in measuring joint angles.Method Methods Twenty-five subjects without knee dysfunction were studied.Every knee joint was tested in extension,below 90° of flexion and above 90° of flexion with the traditional three-point method (TP) and the new four-point method.X-rays were taken as a gold standard measurement.The reliability and validity were analyzed using Bland-Altman plots,which can yield 95% limits of agreement (LOA).Results (1) The joint axis centers moved with changes in joint angle.(2) The 95% LOA of inter-tester reliability was (-5.0,2.7) with the FP and (-6.5,4.4) with the TP.The 95% LOAs of intra-tester reliability were (-3.6,4.0) for tester A and (-4.1,4.8) for tester B with the FP,while (-5.0,6.4) for tester A and (-6.1,5.8) for tester B with the TP.(3) The 95% LOAs in the three positions were (3.5,2.6) in extension,(-3.3,3.6) in mild flexion and (-1.9,5.7) in greater flexion with the FP,and ( 6.8,1.1),(-4.0,7.1) and (0,8.5) with the TP.Conclusions The FP gives better reliability and validity than the TP in joint angle measurement.
3.Clinical significance of postoperative gastrointestinal decompression with enteral feeding tube in elderly patients with gastric cancer
Xianglong ZONG ; Xin JI ; Ziyu JIA ; Xiaojiang WU ; Ji ZHANG ; Zhaode BU
Chinese Journal of Geriatrics 2017;36(6):680-682
Objective To investigate the clinical effects of gastrointestinal decompression with enteral feeding tube in elderly patients with gastric cancer.Methods 78 cases of gastric cancer patients undergoing postoperative gastric decompression with enteral feeding tube were selected as the treatment group,and 66 patients with gastric cancer undergoing postoperative intravenous nutrition and gastric decompression with routine nasogastric tube as the control group in our hospital from January 2015 to December 2015.The incidence rate of gastric tube patency,faster postoperative recovery,nutritional immune improvement,adverse reaction and complication were compared between the two groups.Results The incidence rate of adverse reactions and complications in treatment group were significant lower than in control group (3.0 % vs.12.8 %,x2 =4.4857,P =0.0342;1.5 % vs.10.2%,x2 =4.6620,P =0.0308,respectively).Following parameters were significant better in treatment group versus in control group:the time of evacuating [(3.1 ± 0.3) d vs.(4.0 ± 0.1) d,t =24.9227,P =0.0000],defecation[(4.3 ± 0.6) d vs.(5.5 ± 1.1) d,t =7.9189,P =0.0000],extubation [(5.3±1.3)d vs.(10.1±2.2)d,t=15.5690,P=0.0000],hospitalization[(12.3±2.5)d vs.(18.6± 3.2)d,t=12.9864,P=0.0000],postoperative body weight[(57.2±4.9)kg vs(49.0±7.2)kg,t=-7.8408,P=0.0000],plasma protein[(133.2± 11.2)g/L vs(104.5± 10.3)g/L,t=-16.0055,P=0.0000],hemoglobin[(4.7 ± 1.0) g/L vs (3.2 ± 0.6) g/L,t =-11.0991,P =0.0000] and peripheral blood lymphocyte count[(3.5 ± 0.7) × 109/L vs (2.1 ± 0.4) × 109/L,t =-15.0088,P =0.0000].Conclusions Effects of postoperative gastrointestinal decompression in elderly patients with gastric cancer are similar between with routine gastric tube and with enteral feeding tube.However,the enteral feeding tube-induced enteral nutrition shows fewer side effects and complications,better nutritional and immune effects,and faster postoperative recovery,which is worthy of a generalization and application.