1.Impact of different preparation methods for graft materials on biological properties of allogeneic tendon
Hongxing ZHANG ; Geng LIU ; Wuan QIU
Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research 2014;(39):6348-6352
BACKGROUND:The transplanted tendon must have good biomechanical properties, in order to effectively avoid tendon tear at the anastomosis end during suturing and reduce adhesion of tendon during healing process. OBJECTIVE:To investigate the effects of different methods for preparation of graft materials on the biological properties of tendon al ograft. METHODS:Forty-eight healthy male Leghorns were randomly divided into three groups:vitrification group, chemical extraction group, and control group. Unilateral superficial and deep flexor tendon of the third toe was subjected to vitrification, chemical extraction and no treatment in the three groups, respectively. A part of tendon was taken for biomechanical testing, and the other part was for al ogeneic transplantation. After 1, 2, 3, 6 weeks, peripheral blood CD4+, CD8+T lymphocytes were counted. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:Vitrification could partial y retain the original tendon cells, but the chemical extraction method could not. Tensile strength for tendon rupture, tensile fracture power and tensile elongation at break were not statistical y significant among three groups (P>0.05). At the end of 1 and 2 weeks after transplantation, CD4+, CD8+, CD4+/CD8+difference was significant among the three groups (P<0.05);at the end of 3 and 6 weeks after transplantation, CD4+, CD8+, CD4+/CD8+were significantly less in the vitrification and chemical extraction groups than the control group (P<0.05), but no difference was found between the vitrification group and chemical extraction group (P>0.05). These findings indicate that the vitrification and chemical extraction methods can significantly reduce immunogenicity of the tendon based on effective retention of biomechanical properties of the tendon.
2.An analysis of risk factors for brain metastases after prophylactic cranial irradiation for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer
Guoqin QIU ; Xia ZHOU ; Wuan BAO ; Danhong ZHANG ; Xianghui DU ; Yongling JI ; Lei CHENG ; Ying CHEN
Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology 2016;25(10):1062-1065
Objective To evaluate the high?risk factors for brain metastases after prophylactic cranial irradiation ( PCI), and to provide a basis for personalized treatment. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed in 188 patients with limited?stage small?cell lung cancer who received PCI in our hospital from 2005 to 2010. The Kaplan?Meier method was used to calculate the cumulative rate of brain metastases. The log?rank test and the Cox model were used for the univariate and multivariate analyses of the potential factors for the cumulative incidence of brain metastases, respectively. Results In the 188 patients, 31 ( 16?5%) had brain metastases. The 1?, 2?, and 3?year cumulative incidence rates of brain metastases were 4%, 15%, and 20%, respectively. The univariate analysis showed that staged Ⅲ disease before treatment, elevated levels of tumor markers, incomplete remission after chemoradiotherapy, and local?regional relapse were risk factors for high incidence of brain metastases ( P= 0?044, 0?037, 0?005, 0?007) . The multivariate analysis revealed that incomplete remission after chemoradiotherapy and local?regional relapse after chemoradiotherapy were risk factors for high incidence of brain metastases after PCI ( P= 0?003, 0?040 ) . Conclusions Patients with incomplete remission or local?regional relapse after chemoradiotherapy have high incidence of brain metastases after PCI. For those patients, a frequent follow?up of the central nervous system plus salvage cranial irradiation might provide an alternative to PCI.
3.Investigation and analysis of the reasons for omission of adjuvant radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery for early-stage breast cancer
Xiaoying CUI ; Liming SHENG ; Yongling JI ; Ying CHEN ; Lei CHENG ; Guoqin QIU ; Xia ZHOU ; Wuan BAO ; Yang YANG ; Hongjian YANG ; Xianghui DU
Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology 2019;28(6):421-424
Objective To investigate and analyze the reasons for the omission of adjuvant radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in patients with breast cancer.Methods The clinicopathologial characteristics and socioeconomic data of 55 breast cancer patients undergoing BCS without postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy in our hospital from 2012 to 2016 were retrospectively analyzed.Results Among the 55 patients who did not receive radiotherapy,25 patients were due to low local recurrence risk,12 patients were due to economic or family reasons,12 patients were due to fear of adverse reactions of radiotherapy,and 5 patients were not recommended by primary physicians for radiotherapy.In addition,3 cases with multiple distant metastases and 3 cases with concomitant thyroid cancer didn't received radiotherapy.Conclnsions Low risk local recurrence is the main reason for the omission of adjuvant radiotherapy,followed by the fear of radiation-induced toxicity and poor financial support.Patient education and medical insurance may improve the adjuvant radiotherapy compliance.