1.No-heparizated open operation at low costal arch in live donor nephrectomy via retroperitoneal approach
Zhongyu SONG ; Wenyong YUAN ; Qifa YE ; Yingzi MING ; Ke CHENG ; Shanqun CHEN ; Jianming SUN
Journal of Chinese Physician 2009;11(6):760-762
Objective To evaluate the possibility of no-beparin open operation at low costal arch in live donor nephrectomy via retroperitoneal approach. Methods The effects of 134 cases no-beparin operation and 82 eases heparinized operation at low costal arch in live donor nephrectomy via retroperitoneal approach during 2003.5 to 2008.5 in our hospital were retrospective analyzed. Results The kidneys of the donors in two groups were successfully harvested. The operation time varied from 110 rain to 200 rnin, and warm isebemia time varied from lOs to 20s. Delayed graft function (DGF) was oceurred in one ease in each group. There was no signifieant difference in live donor nephreetomy between the two groups(P >0. 05), but the no-beparin group had less bleeding. Conclusion The no-beparin open operation at low eostal arch in live donor nephrectomy via retroperitoneal approach is technieal]y feasible and safe, and has less bleeding, and little influence on the allograft.
2.Application of modified Z-stent in interventional therapy of Budd-Chiari syndrome
Fengji ZHANG ; Xuan ZHANG ; Shuang QIN ; Dejing ZHANG ; Wenyong YUAN ; Guoqiang SU ; Yulan LIANG
Journal of Xinxiang Medical College 2003;20(5):305-307
Objective To evaluate the utility of modified Z-stent in treatment for Budd-Chiarisyndrome (BCS). Methods A retrospective study was used in twelve BCS patients treated in twohospitals. The Doppler examination was carried out in all patients preoperatively, so as to confirm thenature of the lesion and chose correct type of endovascular modified Z-stent. Under DSA monitoring formembranotomy and dilation of the inferior vena cava(IVC), after that, insert the marked modified Z-stent to IVC correctly, and put the non-stent part to hepatic vein orifice. The cavography and hepaticvenography should confirm the position of the Z-stent. All of 12 patients with membranous obstructionof the IVC(MOVC) or segmental obstruction of the IVC (SOVC)were underwent modified Z-stentplacement. Results The IVC pressure (IVCP) before smd after membranotomy (dilation) were 27.33± 4.12cmH2O and 18.67 ± 5.07cmH2O (P<0.01). Comparing with dilation and putting stent group,the IVCP decreased from 18.67 ± 5.07cmH2O to 11.42 ± 2.11 cmH2O ( P < 0.01 ). The modffied Z-stent could avoid hepatic vein orifice getting compression and resist the retraction of IVC throughly infollowing-up period of 2.5 years. Conclusion s The endovascular treatment of BCS with modified Z-stent is more effective and safer to prevent thrombosis. Further study will be required to observe theirlong term effects.
3.Analgesic effect of intravenous anesthesia induction combined anterior lumbar quadratus block and related hemodynamic changes in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy via retroperitoneal approach
Haijun YUAN ; Xiaoxia HUANG ; Zhijian LAN ; Li FU ; Wenyong PENG ; Yaming FU
Chinese Journal of General Practitioners 2022;21(11):1063-1068
Objective:To investigate the analgesic effect of intravenous anesthesia induction combined with anterior quadratus lumborum block (AQLB)and related hemodynamic changes in patients undergoing laparoscopic retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy (RPN).Methods:A total of 116 patients undergoing elective laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumors in Jinhua Central Hospital from August 2021 to February 2022 were randomly divided into two groups with 58 cases in each group. Patients in control group received intravenous anesthesia , while those in study group received intravenous anesthesia induction with AQLB. The analgesic effect was evaluated at 1, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h after the operation. The hemodynamics were monitored at the time of entering the operating room (T 0), 3 min after induction of anesthesia (T 1), at the beginning of the operation (T 2), after the operation (T 3), and leaving the operating room (T 4). Microcirculation was assessed at 1, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h after operation. Cognitive function was assessed 30min before anesthesia, 6 h, 24 h, and 72 h after operation. Results:At 1, 6, 12, 24 and 48 h after operation, the visual analogue scale (VAS) of the resting (quiet state) pain in the study group were 3.2±1.2, 2.6±0.3,2.0±0.4, 1.5±0.4 and 0.8±0.2, which were significantly lower than those in control group (4.0±1.7, 3.4±0.7, 2.9±0.5, 1.7±0.5 and 1.2±0.3) ( t=2.93, P=0.004; t=8.00, P<0.001; t=10.07, P<0.001; t=2.38, P=0.019; t=8.45, P<0.001). There was no significant difference in heart rate and mean arterial pressure (MAP) at T 0 between two groups ; no significant difference in the heart rate at T 1, T 2, T 3 and T 4. There were significant differences in MAP levels at T 1, T 2, T 3 and T 4 between study group [(80.0±8.0)mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa), (84.4±8.4)mmHg, (80.4±5.7)mmHg, (86.4±4.7)mmHg and control group (77.1±7.5)mmHg, (88.0±8.6)mmHg, (83.0±7.7)mmHg, (92.2±6.2) mmHg; t=2.01, P=0.046; t=2.28, P=0.024; t=2.07, P=0.041; t=5.68, P<0.001]. At 6, 12, 24 and 48 h after operation, the morphological scores of tube loops in the study group were 1.0±0.2, 0.8±0.2, 0.7±0.1 and 0.7±0.1, which were lower than those in the control group (1.1 ±0.2, 0.9±0.2, 0.8±0.2 and 0.8±0.1; t=2.69, P=0.008; t=2.69, P=0.008; t=3.41, P=0.001; t=5.39 , P < 0.001). The blood flow status scores of the study group were 1.1±0.2, 0.9±0.2, 0.8±0.2 and 0.6±0.1, which were lower than those of the control group (1.2±0.2, 1.0±0.2, 0.9±0.2 and 0.7±0.1; t=2.69, P=0.008; t=2.69, P=0.008; t=2.69, P=0.008; t=5.39, P<0.001). The cognitive function scores of the study group and the control group were 24.4±1.0, 27.1±0.9 and 23.5±0.9, 26.7±0.9 at 6 h and 24 h after operation ( t=5.10, P<0.001; t=2.39, P=0.018); while there were no significant at 72 h after operation between two groups (28.2±0.9 vs. 28.1±0.8, t=0.63, P=0.529). Conclusion:Intravenous anesthesia induction combined with anterior quadratus lumborum block has a good analgesic effect in patients undergoing RPN, with stable hemodynamics and microcirculation, and not affecting cognitive function of patients.