Objective:To evaluate the outcomes of intensive conservative treatment compared to conventional conservative treatment in patients with acute aortic syndrome(AAS).Methods:The study prospectively enrolled consecutive patients with AAS who were admitted to Beijing Anzhen Hospital, affiliated with Capital Medical University, and Beijing Dawanglu Emergency Rescue Hospital from January 2024 to December 2024. These patients with surgical contraindications or refused surgery for various reasons opted for conservative treatment. A total of 282 patients were included, and 15 patients with missing data or those who died without any treatment were excluded. Finally, 267 patients were enrolled, of whom 94 received intensive conservative treatment, and 173 received conventional conservative treatment, the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to reduce the influence of confoundings. After adjusting of baseline datas via IPTW, the survival outcomes of the two groups were compared at 14 days, 30 days, and at the end of follow-up.Results:The results showed significant differences in acute phase survival rates between the enhanced conservative treatment group and the conventional conservative treatment group at 14 days(82.40%vs.53.20%, P<0.0001). Significant survival differences were also observed at 30 days and at 276-day mid-term follow-up (96.29% vs.51.60%, P<0.0001; 78.50% vs.48.50%, P<0.0001). In the subgroup analysis, for type A aortic dissection, the enhanced conservative treatment group had higher survival rates compared to the conventional conservative treatment group at 14, 30 and 276 days (63.46% vs.41.35%, P<0.05; 52.17% vs.37.90%, P<0.05; 50.00% vs. 31.97%, P<0.05). However, for type B aortic dissection, although the enhanced conservative treatment group had higher survival rates than the conventional conservative treatment group, no statistically significant differences were observed (96.29% vs. 80.00%, P=0.054; 95.65% vs.78.37%, P=0.067; 94.12% vs.74.20%, P=0.088). Conclusion:For patients diagnosed with AAS are forced to choose conservative treatment if emergency surgery is not possible in the first place, intensive conservative treatment strategies can significantly reduce the mortality in the acute phase compared with conventional conservative treatment. Mid-term follow-up, intensive conservative treatment still has a significant survival advantage.

Objective:To evaluate the outcomes of intensive conservative treatment compared to conventional conservative treatment in patients with acute aortic syndrome(AAS).Methods:The study prospectively enrolled consecutive patients with AAS who were admitted to Beijing Anzhen Hospital, affiliated with Capital Medical University, and Beijing Dawanglu Emergency Rescue Hospital from January 2024 to December 2024. These patients with surgical contraindications or refused surgery for various reasons opted for conservative treatment. A total of 282 patients were included, and 15 patients with missing data or those who died without any treatment were excluded. Finally, 267 patients were enrolled, of whom 94 received intensive conservative treatment, and 173 received conventional conservative treatment, the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to reduce the influence of confoundings. After adjusting of baseline datas via IPTW, the survival outcomes of the two groups were compared at 14 days, 30 days, and at the end of follow-up.Results:The results showed significant differences in acute phase survival rates between the enhanced conservative treatment group and the conventional conservative treatment group at 14 days(82.40%vs.53.20%, P<0.0001). Significant survival differences were also observed at 30 days and at 276-day mid-term follow-up (96.29% vs.51.60%, P<0.0001; 78.50% vs.48.50%, P<0.0001). In the subgroup analysis, for type A aortic dissection, the enhanced conservative treatment group had higher survival rates compared to the conventional conservative treatment group at 14, 30 and 276 days (63.46% vs.41.35%, P<0.05; 52.17% vs.37.90%, P<0.05; 50.00% vs. 31.97%, P<0.05). However, for type B aortic dissection, although the enhanced conservative treatment group had higher survival rates than the conventional conservative treatment group, no statistically significant differences were observed (96.29% vs. 80.00%, P=0.054; 95.65% vs.78.37%, P=0.067; 94.12% vs.74.20%, P=0.088). Conclusion:For patients diagnosed with AAS are forced to choose conservative treatment if emergency surgery is not possible in the first place, intensive conservative treatment strategies can significantly reduce the mortality in the acute phase compared with conventional conservative treatment. Mid-term follow-up, intensive conservative treatment still has a significant survival advantage.

Objective To explore the clinical efficacy of low molecular weight heparin combined with insulin in the treatment of hyper-triglyceridemic-acute pancreatitis(HTG-AP).Methods A total of 106 patients diagnosed with HTG-AP who were admitted to the department of gastroenterology of Huaibei People's Hospital from May 2022 to July 2023 were selected as the research objects.According to the random number table method,the low-molecular heparin group(35 cases,received a 5 000 U subcutaneous injection low-molecular heparin once every 12 hours for 6 days),the insulin group(35 cases,received intravenous insulin pumping at a rate of 2 U/h,with careful monitoring of the patient's random blood glucose levels to prevent hypoglycemia),and the combination therapy group(36 cases,received both low-molecular heparin and insulin).Before treatment and at 1,2,and 6 days after treatment,the difference of serum triacylglycerol(TG),total cholesterol(TC),blood amylase,inflammatory factors[C-reactive protein(CRP),interleukin-6(IL-6)],calcium ions,and creatinine levels among the three groups were compared.The modified computed tomography severity index(MCTSI)scores,acute physiology and chronic health evaluationⅡ(APACHEⅡ),hospital length of stay,and hospital costs before and after 6 days of treatment were observed.Results After treatment,the TC of all three groups significantly decreased compared to before treatment(P<0.05),but there was no significant difference among the three groups.The calcium ion levels of the three groups did not show a statistically significant difference before and after treatment.After 6 days of treatment,the creatinine levels of the three groups significantly decreased compared to before treatment,but there was no significant difference among the three groups.After 2 days of treatment,serum TG levels were significantly lower in the combination therapy group and insulin group compared to the low-molecular heparin group(mmol/L:4.6±1.7,4.4±1.8 vs.5.6±2.0,both P<0.05).However,there was no statistically significant difference between the combination therapy group and the insulin group.After 6 days of treatment,the combination therapy group showed significantly lower levels of serum TG,blood amylase,CRP,and IL-6 compared to the insulin group and the low-molecular heparin group[TG(mmol/L):2.8±1.9 vs.4.3±1.9,5.0±2.2,blood amylase(U/L):36.0(32.0,45.0)vs.59.0(43.0,71.0),52.0(45.0,64.0),CRP(mg/L):12.9(8.8,29.7)vs.35.3(21.7,50.3),31.4(23.0,45.1),IL-6(ng/L):15.4(9.8,23.5)vs.25.6(16.4,51.5),32.9(14.7,41.4),all P<0.05].After 6 days of treatment,the APACHEⅡscores of all three groups decreased significantly(all P<0.05).The MCTSI scores of the insulin group and the combined treatment group also decreased significantly compared to before treatment.Furthermore,the MCTSI and APACHEⅡscores of the combination therapy group were significantly lower than those of the low-molecular heparin group and the insulin group(MCTSI score:2.3±0.7 vs.3.3±1.7,2.9±1.3,APACHEⅡscore:1.3±1.2 vs.2.5±2.4,2.6±2.5,all P<0.05).The combination therapy group had significantly lower length of hospital stay and treatment cost compared to the low molecular heparin and insulin groups[length of hospital stay(days):6.9±1.6 vs.8.8±3.4,8.5±2.8,and cost of treatment(yuan):6 040.5(5 239.4,7 105.9)vs.6 696.4(5 791.5,11 026.2),6 918.5(6 087.9,10 080.8),all P<0.05].Conclusions The combination of low-molecular heparin and insulin treatment can significantly reduce serum TG and inflammatory factor levels,as well as the severity and duration of the disease.This approach can also reduce the cost of treatment.Therefore,it is worth promoting and applying in clinical settings.

Objective: To evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes,and the complications of staged minimally invasive surgery for adult degenerative scoliosis, comparing with that of the conventional open surgery. Methods: From Jun 2013 to Jun 2017, a total of 42 cases of degenerative scoliosis underwent surgical treatment. Among which, 23 cases underwent staged minimally invasive surgery(MIS group) and 19 cases underwent posterior open surgery(open group). The intra-operative bleeding, and operation time were recorded.The clinical outcomes were assessed using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for low back pain and leg pain.The radiological outcome was evaluated with Cobb angles and sagittal balance parameters (Sagittal Vertical Axis (SVA), Pelvic Incidence (PI)-Lumbar Lordosis (LL), Pelvic Tilt (PT)). The occurrence of complications was recorded. Results: The baseline demographic features of both groups (gender, age, medical comorbidity, etc.) were similar.The mean follow-up period for both groups was more than 2 years.The intraoperative bleeding in the MIS group 405.7±144.8 ml was significantly lower than that in the open group (2 005.3±728.4 ml, t=10.31, P<0.001); The total operation time 414.3±63.0 min of MIS group was significantly longer than that of the open group (304.2±51.8 min, t=6.10, P<0.001), but the operating time of each stage was shorter than the open group. The VAS score for back pain and leg pain,the ODI scores were significantly improved after surgery for both group, there was no significant difference between the two groups, but the low back pain and function in MIS group were better than the open group. The parameters of the coronal and sagittal deformity were significantly improved in both groups, correction of coronal deformity in MIS groupwassignificantly superior to the open group (F=12.02, P=0.001), there was no significant difference in sagittal balance correction between the two groups. The overall complication rate (63.2%) was slightly higher in the open group than in the MIS group (34.8%) without significant difference(χ²=3.36, P=0.07). The incidence of major complications in the open group was significantly higher than that in the MIS group (P=0.014). Conclusion Staged minimally invasive surgery can significantly relieve the patient's pain, improve functionand the coronal and sagittal balance of the patient, the early clinical and radiological outcomes were comparable to the open surgery; Minimally invasive surgery may significantly reduce the amount of bleeding and major complications. Minimally invasive surgery is safe and effective for carefully selected patients with degenerative scoliosis.However, the long-term outcomes of minimally invasive surgery remains to be followed up.

Objective To compare iso-osmolar iodixanol and low-osmolar iohexol for the incidence of contrast- induced nephropathy(CIN) in patients with chronic congestive heart failure undergoing coronary interventional therapy. Methods The study included 220 consecutive patients with chronic congestive heart failure and undergoing coronary angiography (CAG) with or without percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) bewteen Janurary 2015 and May 2016. Study participants were divided into two groups by random digits table:iso-osmolar group (110 patients) and low-osmolar group (110 patients). The patients in iso-osmolar group were given iodixanol, and the patients in low-osmolar group were given iohexol. Serum creatinine (SCr), glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and cystatin C (CysC) were detected before the procedure and on the first, third day after the procedure. Then, the incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) in two groups within 72 h of the procedure were observed and compared. Results The levels of SCr, GFR, CysC before operation had no significant differences (P>0.05). The levels of SCr in two groups on the first day after operation were increased, but there was no significant difference between two groups (P>0.05). On the first day after operation, the level of GFR in iso-osmolar group was higher than that in low-osmolar group, the level of CysC in iso-osmolar group was lower than that in low-osmolar group, and there were significant differences (P<0.05). On the third day after operation, the level of GFR in iso-osmolar group was higher than that in low-osmolar group, the level of CysC in iso-osmolar group was lower than that in low-osmolar group, and there were significant differences (P<0.01). The overall incidence of CIN was 20.9%(46/220). The incidence of CIN in low-osmolar group was 29.1%(32/110), in iso-osmolar group was 12.7%(14/110), and there was significant difference (P<0.05). Conclusions In chronic congestive heart failure patients undergoing coronary interventional therapy, the iso-osmolar contrast iodixanol is associated with a lower incidence of CIN compared with low-osmolar iohexol.

Objective To explore the outcomes and complications of 111 patients with pituitary neoplasms after neuroendoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgeries.Methods A retrospective review of clinical and radiographic data of 111 patients (113 procedures),admitted to our hospital from June 2010 to July 2014,was performed.The resection rate,clinical cured rate and complications in pituitary neoplasms of different Knosp classifications were compared.Results Gross total resection (GTR) rate for pituitary neoplasms according to Knosp classification was 97.4％ in grade 0,85.7％ in grade 1,88.7％ in grade 2,51.9％ in grade 3 and 0％ in grade 4,with significant differences (P＜0.05);GTR rate in pituitary neoplasms of grade 3 and 4 was significantly lower than that in pituitary neoplasms of grade 1 and 2 (P＜0.05).Clinical cured rate of the prolactin adenomas of different Knosp grades was significantly different,and that of grade 0 was statistically higher than that of grade 1-4 (P＜0.05).Clinical cured rate of growth hormone adenoma,adeno-corticotrophic stimulating hormone adenoma and mixed-functional adenomas of different grades showed no significant differences (P＞0.05).Chief complaints were improved in 75.0％-91.7％ non-functioning adenomas.Postoperative severe complications included 3 patients (2.7％) with cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea,4 (3.5％) intracranial hematoma,1 (0.9％);postoperative mild complications included 3 (2.7％) epistaxis,14 (12.4％) transient diabete insipidus,1 (0.9％) permanent diabetes insipidus and 3 (2.7％) hyponatremia.Mortality was observed in one patient with intracranial hematoma.Conclusions Neurendoscope provides a superior view of the sellar region,and improves the extent of resection of pituitary adenoma especially for those with cavernous sinus invasion;however,blind pursuit of GTR for tumor with Knosp classification greater than grade 3 will increase the risk of severe complications.Safety should always be the priority for a procedure with a long learning curve like neuroendoscopic surgery.Remission of residue tumor can be addressed by subsequent radiotherapy/stereotactic surgery.

BACKGROUNDThe purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the surgical outcomes of simple discectomy and instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion (iPLIF) in patients with lumbar disc herniation and Modic endplate changes. Our hypothesis was that iPLIF could provide better outcome for patients with refractory lumbar disc herniation and Modic changes (LDH-MC).

METHODSNinety-one patients with single-segment LDH-MC were recruited. All patients experienced low back pain as well as radicular leg pain, and low back pain was more severe than leg pain. Forty-seven patients were treated with discectomy and 44 were treated with iPLIF. The outcomes of both low back pain and radicular leg pain using visual analogue scale (VAS) as well as the clinical outcome related to low back pain using Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score were assessed before and 18 months after surgery, respectively.

RESULTSBoth low back and leg pain were significantly improved 18 months after simple discectomy and iPLIF. Compared to patients undergoing simple discectomy, low back pain was significantly reduced in patients undergoing iPLIF, but there was no significant difference in leg pain between two groups. Solid fusion was achieved in all patients who underwent iPLIF.

CONCLUSIONSIn patients with LDH-MC, iPLIF can yield significantly superior outcome on the relief of low back pain compared to simple discectomy. Simple discectomy can relieve radicular leg pain as efficient as iPLIF. Accordingly, iPLIF seems to be a reliable treatment for patients with LDH-MC and predominant low back pain.

Adult ; Diskectomy ; standards ; Female ; Humans ; Intervertebral Disc Displacement ; surgery ; Low Back Pain ; surgery ; Lumbar Vertebrae ; surgery ; Middle Aged ; Retrospective Studies ; Spinal Fusion ; standards

Objective: To observe the clinical efficacy of combined needle-embedding and SSRIs for depressive sleep disorder. Method: Upon admission, 71 depression cases were randomized into needle-embedding group of 24 cases, using combined needle-embedding and SSRIs, acupuncture group of 21 cases, using combined acupuncture and SSRIs, and medication group of 26 cases, using SSRIs alone. After 1, 2, 4 and 6 weeks of treatment, the HAMD sleep scores were compared. Result: The HAMD sleep scores in the needle-embedding and acupuncture group were remarkably superior to the medication group and there was significant statistical difference after 1, 2 and 4 weeks of treatment (P<0.01). However, there was no statistical difference after 6 weeks of treatment. Conclusion: SSRIs can improve HAMD sleep scores. The combined needle-embedding or acupuncture with SSRIs can work faster and better than medication alone. There was no statistical difference between needle-embedding and acupuncture group, however, needle-embedding can reduce the treatment frequencies and therefore has more active clinical meaning.