Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy of expulsive therapy using alpha 1-selective adrenoblocker and prostaglandin synthetase inhibitor for distal ureteral stones.Methods 94 patients with distal ureteral stone were randomly divided into study group and control group.In study group,47 cases received tamsulosin 0.2mg daily and dielofenac rectal suppositories 50mg 2 times daily,while watchful waiting without tamsulosin and diclofenac suppository in 47 cases of control group.Observation lasted 2 weeks and also stone expelled as end point.Results No severe adverse reactions related to the drugs were noted and no patients withdrew from the study.The stone-free rate was 91.5%(43/47) of the study group and 25.5% (12/47) of the control group (P＜0.01).A mean stone expelling date of the control group was(8.9±4.3)d and that of the study group was(6.4±3.7)d(P＜0.01).Rates of renoureteral colic recurred in the study group and the control group were 4.3%(2/47) and 48.9%(23/47),respectively (P＜0.01).Conclusion Treatment of distal ureteral stones wlth tamsulosin and dielofenac suppository can increase the stone-free rate,shorten mean stone expelling date,decrease rate of renottreteral colic recurred.

Objective To study the impact of preprocedure intravenous urography (IVU) on the extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy(ESWL) for proximal ureteral stones.Methods One hundred patients with solitary radiopaque proximal ureteral stones on plain radiographs and no severe hydronephrosis on ultrasonographic examination were allocated randomly to two treatment groups.IVU group (n=50) had IVU before the start of ESWL,whereas patients in control group (n=50) underwent ESWL without IVU.Postop- erative success,the stone-free rates and complications were evaluated in both groups. Results Seven patients in IVU group were excluded from the study. The success rate [95.3%(41/43) in IVU group vs 94.0% (47/50) in control group],stone-free rate [83.7% (36/43)vs 86.0% (43/50)] and complication rate[27.9% (12/43 ) vs 26.0% (13/50)]were similar in two groups (P＞0.05).Conclusions It is not necessary to obtain an IVU for patients who have solitary radiopaque proximal ureteral calculi on plain radiographs with no severe hydronephrosis on uhrasonographie examination before scheduling them for ESWL,thus minimizing the cost,avoiding exposure to contrast medium,and reducing radiation exposure.

Objective To study the impact of preprocedure intravenous urography(IVU)on the outcome of shock wave Iithotripsy(SWL)for the middle and lower ureteral stones.Methods 112 patients with solitary radiopaque the middle and lower ureterat stones on plain radiographs and no severe hydronephrosis on ultrasonographic examination were divided randomly to two treatment groups.IVU group(n=56)had IVU before the start of SwL,whereas patients in the control group(n=56)underwent SWL without IVU.Postoperative success,stone-free rates and complications were evaluated in both groups.Results Eleven patients in the IVU group were excluded from the study.The SUCCESS rate[91.1%(41/45)in IVP group VS 94.6%(53/56)in control group],stone-free rate[88.9%(40/45)vs 89.3%(50/56)],and complication rate[22.2%(10/45)vs 21.4%(12/56)]were similar in two groups(P＞0.05).ConclusionIt is not necessary to obtain an IVU for patients who have solitary radiopaque the middle and lower calculi on plain radiographs with no severe hydronephrosis on ultrasonographic examination before scheduling them for SWL,thus minimizing the cost,avoiding exposure to contrast medium,and reducing radiation exposure.