Objective To investigate the effect of collaborative care model(CCM)on the rehabilitation of nursing intervention of COPD(chronic obstructive pulmonary disease)patients.Methods Sixty COPD patients treated in the community clinics were equally divided into control and experiment group and the former received routine nursing and the latter CCM. After nursing intervention, the two groups were compared in terms of pulmonary function and quality of life.Result After intervention, the experiment group was better in pulmonary function and the score by SF-36QOL was higher than that of the control group(P<0.001).Conclusion CCM helps the improvement of pulmonary function of COPD patients and therefore enhances the quality of life.

Objective:To examine the adiponectin level in gingival crevicular fluid(GCF)in patients of chronic periodontitis with dia-betes mellitus type 2.Methods:20 patients of diabetes mellitus type 2 with chronic periodontitis(DM&CP),20 of periodontitis(CP) and 20 health subjects(H)were included.The periodontal indexes (SBI,PLI,PD and AL)were measured,GCF samples were quan-tified by periotron 8000,the adiponectin content in GCF was tested by adiponectin ELISA kit.The relationship between the adiponectin level in GCF and the periodontal indexes of the DM&CP patients was analyzed statistically.Results:The adiponectin level in GCF in group DM&CP was significantly lower than that in the other 2 groups(P <0.05).The adiponectin levels in GCF in group CP and H were not statistically different.The adiponectin level in GCF was negatively correlated with PD and AL(P <0.05),but had no correlation with SBI and PLI(P >0.05).Conclusion:Decrease of adiponectin in GCF may play a role in the development of DM&CP.

Objective To study the feasibility and safety of laparoscopy-assisted D2 radical gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer. Methods From June, 2006 to July 2009, 11 patients with gastric cancer received laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer. According to UICC TNM classification of gastric cancer, 6 cases were with Stage Ⅱ, 2 cases with Stage Ⅲ A, 1 case with Stage Ⅲ B, and 2 cases with Stage Ⅳ. Under the assistance of laparoscope, dissociation of the stomach and lymph nodes clearance were performed first; then gastrectomy was performed on a 6 cm incision, samples were collected, and alimentary tract was inoculated. Results Among the 11 cases, 2 cases were performed radical total gastrectomy, 1 case was performed proximal partial gastrectomy, 7 cases were performed distal partial gastrectomy and 1 case with open surgery. The mean operation time: 350 min for total gastrectomy, 320 min for proximal partial gastrectom,266 min for distal partial gastrectomy. The mean number of harvested lymph nodes was 21.3 (11-38), incisal edge was 5.6 (4.0-9.6) cm. The mean time was 72 (36-110) hrs for gastrointestinal function recovery, 59 (26-86) hrs for patients to take general activity, and 76 (48-116) hrs to take liquid food. No complication was observed. Conclusion Laparoscopy-assisted D2 radical gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer is safe and feasible. Compared with open surgery, it also has the advantages of small wound and fast recovery.

Objective To assess the value of low dose CT scanning applied in nasal sinus examination. Methods 100 cases were divided into two groups,including youth group and adult group,with 50 cases for each group.After scanned by standard dose(150mAs),all the patients were scanned with low dose. Those in youth group were scanned with 40mAs and 25mAs,and the others in adult group were scanned with 50mAs and 30mAs.CT images were evaluated by three doctors using blind method.The image quality was evaluated according to 3 grades:normal image,image with mild artifact,and image with serious artifact and the results were analyzed statistically. Results The CTDlw of low-dose CT scanning was obviously lower than that of standard dose(P

Objective To study the clinic effect and safety of MEAD chemotherapy regimen for adult patients with relapsed or refractory acute lymphocyte leukemia. Methods Between July 2006 and July 2009,twenty-two adult patients with relapsed or refractory acute lymphocyte leukemia received MEAD regimen (mitoxantrone 6 mg/d dl-3 iv drip,cytarabine 100 mg/d dl-5 iv drip,etoposide 100 mg/d dl-5 iv drip,dexmethasone 10 mg/d dl-8 iv drip). Results The complete remission (CR) rate of adult patients with relapsed or refractory acute lymphocyte leukemia was 31.8 %,the partial remission(PR) rate was 22.7 % and the overall response (OR) rate 54.5 %. The cumulitive CR rate was 50.0 %,and the PR rate 40.9 % after two times MEAD chemotherapy regimen. The main adverse effect was different level of myelosuppression,and other toxicity of vital organ was mild. Conclusion MEAD regimen is effective and can be tolerated for adult patients with relapsed or refractory acute lymphocyte leukemia,and its side effect is mild.

Objective To investigate the application value of vessel-guided lymph node dissection (LND) in the laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (D2) of distal gastric cancer.Methods The retrospective crosssectional study was conducted.The clinicopathological data of 157 patients who underwent laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (D2) of distal gastric cancer in the Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Shanxi Medical University from October 2012 to July 2015 were collected.Patients used vessel-guided LND that was divided into 4 steps:middle colic vessel-guided LND in the upper pyloric region,gastroduodenal artery-guided LND in the lower pyloric region,common hepatic artery-guided LND in the right upper margin of pancreas and splenic artery-guided LND in the left upper margin of pancreas.Observation indicators:(1) surgical and intraoperative situations,(2) postoperative pathological results,(3) follow-up situations.Follow-up using outpatient examination and telephone interview was performed to detect the postoperative 3-year survival rate up to June 2017.Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as xes.The survival rate was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.Results (1) Surgical and intraoperative situations:157 patients underwent successful laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (D2) of distal gastric cancer.Operation time,LND time,volume of intraoperative blood loss,time for initial out-of-bed activity,time to initial anal exsufflation and time of postoperative abdominal drainage-tube removal were (178± 38) minutes,(61 ± 27) minutes,(87 ± 40) mL,(1.2± 0.4) days,(2.8 ± 1.3) days and (7.5 ± 2.6) days,respectively.Of 157 patients,10 with postoperative complications were improved by conservative treatment,including 5 with intestinal obstruction,3 with anastomotic fistula and 2 dying of pulmonary infection;other patients didn't have complications.Duration of hospital stay of 157 patients was (9±3)days.(2) Postoperative pathological results:total number of LND,numbers of LND in the lower pyloric region and in the upper margin of pancreas were 34.6±11.0,4.8±2.1 and 12.3±4.7,respectively.TNM staging:26,33,18,24,37 and 19 patients were respectively detected in stage Ⅰ a,Ⅰ b,Ⅱa,Ⅱ b,Ⅲa and Ⅲb.(3) Follow-up situations:142 of 157 patients were followed up for 6-56 months,with a median time of 27 months,and postoperative 3-year survival rate was 67.6％.Conclusion The vessel-guided LND is safe and effective in the laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (D2) of distal gastric cancer,and the operation steps can be simplified.

Objective: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of two different digestive tract reconstruction methods in the Siewert Ⅱ or Ⅲ adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction underwent proximal gastrectomy and piggyback jejunal interposition. Methods: A total of 84 patients with Siewert Ⅱ or Ⅲ AEG who underwent proximal gastrectomy and interposition jejunal anastomosis were enrolled prospectively according to the exclusion criteria, from October 2015 to August 2017 at Department of Digestive Minimally Invasive Surgery, Shanxi Cancer Hospital. There were 61 male and 23 female patients, aged 48-69 years with an average age of 59.7 years. They were divided into single-tract reconstruction group (n=41) and double-tract reconstruction group (n=43) according to random number table. Both groups underwent proximal gastrectomy and piggyback jejunal interposition. After side-to-side anastomosis of the remnant stomach and jejunum was performed in the single-tract group, jejunum 3 cm below the anastomosis was ligated or closed. The jejunum in the double-tract group was not treated during the operation. Relevant nutritional indicators were collected at 3 months and 6 months after operation. The data were analyzed by repeated measurement of variance analysis to determine the nutritional status. Results: There was no significant difference in preoperative general condition between single-tract reconstruction group and double-tract reconstruction group (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in perioperative related indicators (P>0.05). Nutritional indicators in single-channel reconstruction group were higher than those in double-channel reconstruction group (hemoglobin: F=23.374, P=0.000; albumin: F=6.149, P=0.003; total protein: F=18.362, P=0.000; weight: F=74.255, P=0.000). The quality of life was compared half year after operation, there was no significant difference in the incidence of subjective symptoms such as reflux, heart burning, nausea and vomiting, dysphagia and sternum discomfort in the two groups (P>0.05), as well as the results of QLQ-STO22 score (27.0±3.8 vs. 27.6±3.3, t=-0.688, P=0.494). The results of gastroscopy showed that the incidence and degree of the two groups were almost the same whether in the incidence of reflux esophagitis (2/41 vs. 2/43, P=1) or in the contrast of reflux degree (Z=-1.528, P=0.127). Conclusion For patients with type Siewert Ⅱ or Ⅲ esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma who underwent proximal gastrectomy and piggyback jejunal operation, single tract reconstruction is ideal.

Objective:To understand the perceptions, attitudes and treatment selection of Chinese surgeons for proximal gastrectomy (PG) and digestive tract reconstruction.Methods:A cross-sectional survey was used in this study. Selection of subjects: (1) Domestic public grade IIIA (provincial and prefecture-level) tumor hospitals or general hospitals possessing the diagnosis and treatment qualifications for gastric cancer.(2) Surgeons with senior attending physician, associate chief physician and chief physician. The "Questionnaire Star" platform was used to design a questionnaire about cognition, attitude and treatment choice of "proximal gastrectomy and digestive tract reconstruction". The questionnaire contained 32 questions, such as the basic information of surgeons, the current status of gastric cancer surgery, the selection and management of surgical methods and related details for proximal gastric cancer, the choice of proximal gastrectomy and reconstruction of digestive tract, the related complications and nutritional status monitoring after proximal gastrectomy. A total of 76 questionnaires were linked to the respondents via WeChat between July 29 and August 25, 2019. Statistical analysis was performed using Chi-square test or Kruskal-Wallis test for categorical variables.Results:A total of 47 grade IIIA hospitals were included, and 76 questionnaires were sent out. The proportions of recovered and valid questionnaires were both 100%. For early and middle stage adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction (AEG), especially those smaller than 4 cm, 72.37% (55/76) of surgeons preferred proximal gastrectomy, while 22.37% (17/76) of surgeons chose total gastrectomy. For early AEG, 90.79% (69/76) of surgeons thought that endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) or proximal gastrectomy could be considered. For AEG below T3 stage and shorter than 4 cm, 60.53% (46/76) of surgeons gave priority to proximal gastrectomy, and 60.53% (46/76) of the surgeons believed that the advanced AEG with a higher radical cure should be treated with proximal gastrectomy, and the residual stomach should not be less than half stomach. Considering anti-reflux effect, postoperative weight recovery, clinical efficacy, wide application and easy popularization, surgeons preferred double-tract reconstruction. The surgeons in tumor hospitals had a higher approval rate for the application of proximal gastrectomy and the fact that the Kamikawa anastomosis was the most difficult to promote than the surgeons in provincial/municipal general hospitals. The surgeons with an annual surgical volume of more than 200 were more likely to choose proximal gastrectomy for early and middle stage AEG patients and the proportion was as high as 8/9. From the perspective of good clinical results, wide range of application, and easy popularization, the surgeons with a higher ratio (60.00%, 15/25) of double-tract reconstruction were those surgeons with 50-100 operations per year.Conclusions:The general level of cognition and acceptability of Chinese surgeons for proximal gastrectomy and reconstruction of digestive tract is suboptimal. In the future, it is urgent to promote the "Chinese consensus on digestive tract reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy" so as to guide and optimize treatment in proximal gastric cancer.

Objective:To understand the perceptions, attitudes and treatment selection of Chinese surgeons for proximal gastrectomy (PG) and digestive tract reconstruction.Methods:A cross-sectional survey was used in this study. Selection of subjects: (1) Domestic public grade IIIA (provincial and prefecture-level) tumor hospitals or general hospitals possessing the diagnosis and treatment qualifications for gastric cancer.(2) Surgeons with senior attending physician, associate chief physician and chief physician. The "Questionnaire Star" platform was used to design a questionnaire about cognition, attitude and treatment choice of "proximal gastrectomy and digestive tract reconstruction". The questionnaire contained 32 questions, such as the basic information of surgeons, the current status of gastric cancer surgery, the selection and management of surgical methods and related details for proximal gastric cancer, the choice of proximal gastrectomy and reconstruction of digestive tract, the related complications and nutritional status monitoring after proximal gastrectomy. A total of 76 questionnaires were linked to the respondents via WeChat between July 29 and August 25, 2019. Statistical analysis was performed using Chi-square test or Kruskal-Wallis test for categorical variables.Results:A total of 47 grade IIIA hospitals were included, and 76 questionnaires were sent out. The proportions of recovered and valid questionnaires were both 100%. For early and middle stage adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction (AEG), especially those smaller than 4 cm, 72.37% (55/76) of surgeons preferred proximal gastrectomy, while 22.37% (17/76) of surgeons chose total gastrectomy. For early AEG, 90.79% (69/76) of surgeons thought that endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) or proximal gastrectomy could be considered. For AEG below T3 stage and shorter than 4 cm, 60.53% (46/76) of surgeons gave priority to proximal gastrectomy, and 60.53% (46/76) of the surgeons believed that the advanced AEG with a higher radical cure should be treated with proximal gastrectomy, and the residual stomach should not be less than half stomach. Considering anti-reflux effect, postoperative weight recovery, clinical efficacy, wide application and easy popularization, surgeons preferred double-tract reconstruction. The surgeons in tumor hospitals had a higher approval rate for the application of proximal gastrectomy and the fact that the Kamikawa anastomosis was the most difficult to promote than the surgeons in provincial/municipal general hospitals. The surgeons with an annual surgical volume of more than 200 were more likely to choose proximal gastrectomy for early and middle stage AEG patients and the proportion was as high as 8/9. From the perspective of good clinical results, wide range of application, and easy popularization, the surgeons with a higher ratio (60.00%, 15/25) of double-tract reconstruction were those surgeons with 50-100 operations per year.Conclusions:The general level of cognition and acceptability of Chinese surgeons for proximal gastrectomy and reconstruction of digestive tract is suboptimal. In the future, it is urgent to promote the "Chinese consensus on digestive tract reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy" so as to guide and optimize treatment in proximal gastric cancer.

Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of jejunal interposed single-tract and doubletract reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy for Siewert type Ⅱ and Ⅲ adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG).Methods The prospective study was conducted.The clinicopathological data of 108 patients with Siewert type Ⅱ and Ⅲ AEG who were admitted to the Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Shanxi Medical University between August 2013 and November 2016 were collected.All the patients underwent proximal gastrectomy and were allocated into the 2 groups by random number table,including patients using single-tract jejunal interposition reconstruction in the single-tract group and patients using double-tract jejunal interposition reconstruction in the double-tract group.Digestive tract reconstruction:after end-to-side anastomosis between distal jejunum and esophagus and side-to-side anastomosis between posterior wall of the gastric remnant and jejunum,single-tract jejunal reconstruction was done through ligating jejunum at 3 cm below the anastomotic stoma,and then side-to-side anastomosis between proximal jejunum and jejunum was performed in the single-tract group.Patients in the double-tract group used the same digestive tract reconstruction,but jejunum was not ligated.The postoperative pathological examinations showed that patients with positive lymph nodes or tumor invading all layers of gastric wall underwent chemotherapy.Observation indicators:(1) intra-and post-operative situations;(2) follow-up situations.Follow-up using telephone interview was performed to detect postoperative complication,gastrointestinal function and body mass index (BMI) up to November 2017.Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as-x± s and comparison between groups was analyzed using t test.Measurement data with skewed distribution were described as M (range),and comparison between groups was analyzed using the nonparametric test.Repeated measurement data were analyzed by the repeated measures ANOVA.Comparisons of count data were done using chi-square test.Ordinal data were analyzed by the Kruskal Wallis H test.Results One hundred and eight patients were screened for eligibility,including 55 in the single-tract group and 53 in the double-tract group.(1) Intra-and post-operative situations:total operation time,digestive tract reconstruction time,volume of intraoperative blood loss,time to initial anal exsufflation,postoperative complications,cases with gastroesophageal reflux,intestinal obstruction and Visick grading ＞ Ⅱ and duration of postoperative hospital stay were respectively (145±26) minutes,(30±6) minutes,(181±37) mL,(53± 16) hours,1,1,1,(10.0±2.4) days in the singletract group and (139±29)minutes,(26±3)minutes,(176±31)mL,(50±17) hours,3,0,3,(9.4±l.4)days in the double-tract group,with no statistically significant difference between groups (t =0.725,0.219,0.162,-0.576,x2 =2.960,5.830,t =-0.993,P＞0.05).Four patients with gastroesophageal reflux received motilium and omeprazole therapy for 2 weeks,and were improved by symptomatic treatment such as increasing the solid food intake.One patient in the single-tract group had internal hernia-induced intestinal obstruction and was cured by reoperation.There was no anastomotic leakage,bleeding,infection,dumping syndrome and gallstone between groups.Of 108 patients,71 underwent 6-cycle SOX chemotherapy,including 67 with perigastric lymph node metastasis and 4 with tumor invading all layers of gastric wall.(2) Follow-up situations:108 patients were followed up for 12.0-48.0 months,with a median time of 28.6 months.During the follow-up,bowel sound in the double-tract group and single-tract group was 8 times / minute (range,5-12 times / minute) and 3 times /minute (range,2-5 times/ minute),with a statistically significant difference between groups (Z=-0.692,P＜0.05).The single food intake,serum gastrin level,ratio of serum pepsinogen Ⅰ and Ⅱ levels and BMI from preoperation to postoperative 12 months were from (1 117± 129)mL to (817± 127)mL,from (12±5)pmol/L to (41±13) pmol/L,from 11.3±2.8 to 5.1±2.2,(65±7)kg to (63±5) kg in the single-tract group and from (1 095±118)mL to (783±80)mL,from (10±4)pmol/L to (40±10)pmol/L,from 12.4±2.9 to 4.2±1.3,from (63±6) kg to (58±6)kg in the double-tract group,respectively,with no statistically significant difference in single food intake,serum gastrin level and ratio of serum pepsinogen Ⅰ and Ⅱ levels between groups (F =0.468,0.108,0.161,P＞0.05).There was a statistically significant difference in changing trend of BMI between groups (F=24.930,P＜0.05).Conclusion Jejunal interposed single-tract and double-tract reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy for Siewert type Ⅱ and Ⅲ AEG have the same surgical safety and don't affect secretion function of gastric remnant,but there are frequent bowel sounds and obvious weight loss.