Objective To study the therapeutic value of endoscopy for secondary prophylaxis of esophagogastricvariceal bleeding(EGVB).Methods Records of 117 patients with EGVB who were treated with endoscopic ligation and/or histoacryl injection (n =55) and devascularization (n =62) from August 2006 to September 2014 were reviewed.Rebleeding rate,time of rebleeding,incidence of complication,cumulative survival rate,length of ward stay and mean total costs were compared between two groups.Indices were compared according to Child-Pugh.Results The rebleeding rate in the endoscopic group was higher than that in the surgical group[46.2％(24/52) VS 25.0％(15/60),P=0.019] during a mean follow-up of 32.5 months,especially in Child-Pugh B[60.0％(15/25) VS 22.2％(6/27),P=0.006].But the rebleeding time was similar between two groups(P＞0.05).The rate of complications in endoscopic group was lower than that in surgical group [20.0％ (11/55) VS 32.3％ (20/62),P =0.134].No significant difference in cumulative survival rate was observed between the groups (89.1％ VS 87.1％,P＞0.05).The length of ward stay[(14±9)d VS(23±8) d,P＜0.001] and mean total cost[(54 136.79± 44 836.32) yuan VS (73 601.86± 103 403.74)yuan,P＜0.05] in endoscopic group were significantly less than those in surgical group.Conclusion Therapeutic endoscopy is as effective as secondary prophylaxis of esophagogastric variceal bleeding.Endoscopic treatment leads to higher rebleeding rate,but is advantageous in similar rebleeding time,smaller injury,less complications,shorter length of ward stay and lower costs.