Objective To investigate the characteristics and influencing factors of infection in elderly patients with oral and maxillofacial surgery,and to explore the effect of infection on inflammatory response-related proteins,in order to guide the clinical treatment.Methods A total of 653 cases of patients aged more than 60 who were treated with oral and maxillofacial surgery during January 2004 to December 2015 in Shenzhen People's hospital was involved and divided into infected group (n =48) and uninfected group (n =605) according to whether postoperative nosocomial infection was occurred.The characteristics and influencing factors of infection were observed.A total of 171 cases of healthy volunteers whose age and sex were matched with patients were collected as control group.The expressions of inflammatory responserelated proteins in 3 groups were compared.Results The main site of postoperative nosocomial infection was lower respiratory tract,with 15 cases of patients,accounting for 31.3％.A total of 48 strains of pathogens was isolated,the main pathogenic bacteria were Streptococcus pyogenes,with 8 strains,accounting for 16.7％.Streptococcus pyogenes had high drug resistance to erythromycin and clindamycin,and had high sensitivity to penicillin G and meropenem.Aged more than 70,operation time more than 3 h,the primary diseases as malignant tumor were the independent risk factors for postoperative nosocomial infection (P ＜0.05).Blood interleukin (IL)-1,IL-2,IL-6,IL-10,tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α),transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) and interferon-γ (IFN-γ) in infected group were more than uninfected group and control group.The differences were statistically significant (P ＜ 0.05).Conclusions The rate of infection in elderly patients with oral and maxillofacial surgery is still high in our hospital.The main site of infection is lower respiratory tract and the main pathogens were Streptococcus pyogenes.Aged more than 70,operation time more than 3 h,the primary diseases as malignant tumor were the independent risk factors for postoperative nosocomial infection.Infection can lead to peripheral inflammatory factor levels increase significantly.

Objective: To explore the clinical manifestations, histopathological features, diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of Rosai-Dorfman′s disease (RDD) in the maxillofacial region and to review the relevant literature in order to improve the understanding, diagnosis and treatment of oral and maxillofacial RDD. Methods : The clinical manifestations, histopathological features, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of a patient with RDD in the maxillofacial region admitted to Shenzhen People′s Hospital were analyzed, and the literature was reviewed for analysis. Results: The clinical manifestations were palpable masses of 3.5 cm × 2.0 cm × 1.0 cm in the right cheek and 3.0 cm × 2.0 cm × 1.0 cm in the right submaxillary area, with clear boundaries, good mobility, medium and hard textures, respectively, no tenderness, smooth surfaces, and no obvious nodules. On contrast-enhanced and plain CT scans of the maxilla and neck, a diffuse soft tissue shadow was seen in the right maxillofacial region with an unclear boundary and uniform density, and the contrast-enhanced scan also showed moderate and uniform enhancement. The primary diagnosis was right maxillofacial lesions. The tumor was resected surgically. The pathological report was right buccal and right submaxillary extranodal RDD. Under light microscopy, nodular lesions in the fibrous fat tissue were found, which were composed of light and deep staining areas. The light staining areas consisted of patchy, polygonal cells with large volumes and rich cytoplasm, in which lymphocytes and neutrophils could be seen stretching into the movement; the deep staining areas were composed of lymphocytes and plasma cells. IHC: S-100 (+), CD68 (+), CD163 (+), CD1a (-), CD21FDC (+), langerin (-), IgG (+), IgG4 (+). No recurrence was found 11 months after the operation. RDD is a rare, benign and self-limited tissue and cell disease and consists of multiple lesions in the maxillofacial region. Its imaging features are similar to those of lymphoma. Its pathological features are large volumes, rich cytoplasm and phagocytosis of lymphocytes and plasma cells. Generally, RDD only needs to be observed, and individuals with symptoms or the involvement of important organs need to be treated; the first choice for the extranodal type is drug treatment, with radiotherapy administered if the central nervous system is involved. Surgery is recommended if involvement of important organs and compression of the trachea are observed; chemotherapy should be used for diffuse RDD. Most patients with RDD experienced relapse or remission of the disease; a few patients died because of the involvement of important organs or complications. Conclusion The clinical manifestations of maxillofacial RDD vary and lack specific imaging features, and pathological immunohistochemistry is the gold standard for diagnosis. The etiology is not completely clear, the treatment methods are varied, and the prognosis is related to the involved range of the disease.