Dynamic knee valgus is considered a risk factor of non-contact anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. To identify athletes at a higher risk, we developed a two-dimensional (2D) video-based screening test that determines hip abductor function as well as dynamic hindfoot and knee valgus. The purpose of this study was to validate the accuracy of the indices for dynamic knee valgus derived knee-in distance (KID) and hip-out distance (HOD) from the 2D-video.Twenty healthy university students agreed to participate in this study. Subjects were asked to step off a 30-cm box and land on one leg. This procedure was recorded simultaneously using a 2D video camera in the frontal plane and the Vicon motion capture system. Pearson's correlations examined associations between KID, KID normalized by height (KID/H), HOD, as well as HOD normalized by height (HOD/H) and 3D-valgus (knee valgus) or 3D-IR (tibial internal rotation).Significant correlations were found between the KID and 3D-valgus (r=0.72, p<0.01) and KID/H and 3D-valgus (r=0.73, p<0.01). Associations were not significant between KID and 3D-IR (r=0.08) and between KID/H and 3D-IR (r=0.03). A positive moderate correlation between HOD and 3D-valgus (r=0.46, p<0.05) and HOD/H and 3D-valgus (r=0.50, p<0.05), as well as a negative moderate correlations between HOD and 3D-IR (r=-0.52, p<0.05) and between HOD/H and 3D-IR (r=-0.51, p<0.05) were also observed.We conclude that KID is a reliable alternative for the 3D-valgus and the HOD is for the 3D-valgus and tibial external rotation.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. PURPOSE: This study aims to investigate postoperative shoulder imbalance (PSI) ≥5 years postoperatively in patients who underwent posterior spinal fusion using hooks at the upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) for Lenke type 1 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Studies have reported PSI due to excessive correction of the main thoracic curve. METHODS: We examined 56 patients with AIS who underwent a posterior spinal fusion with hooks at the UIV from 2004 to 2010. Of these, we enrolled 14 patients who underwent surgery, at least, 5 years ago. X-rays and Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) questionnaire were administered. To evaluate the shoulder balance, T1 vertebral tilt angle (T1 tilt), clavicle angle, and radiographic shoulder height (RSH) were measured. PSI was considered as the absolute value of the postoperative RSH being ≥20 mm. Based on radiographs obtained immediately postoperatively, we divided patients into two groups as follows: the balanced group (absolute value of RSH <20 mm) and imbalanced group (absolute value of RSH ≥20 mm). RESULTS: The frequency of PSI was 28.6% immediately postoperatively, 0% 2 years postoperatively, and 7.1% at the last follow-up. In the balanced group, PSI did not occur even at 2 years postoperatively or at the last follow-up. In the imbalanced group, PSI was improved in all patients 2 years postoperatively and all patients, except one patient, at the last follow-up. No significant differences were noted in the frequency of distal adding-on at 2 years postoperatively or the last follow-up between the balanced group and the imbalanced group. We observed moderate negative correlations between the absolute value of T1 tilt and the SRS-22 pain and satisfaction at the last follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Hooks at the UIV could adjust the shoulder balance to avoid long-term PSI in patients with AIS.

Background: Patients with malignant brain tumors are often accompanied by progressive loss of consciousness, aphasia, and paralysis, and often miss the time to make decisions on their own. Methods: In an acute neurosurgical unit, a multidisciplinary conference was held to support decision-making, and a brain tumor-specific advance care planning (ACP) leaflet was created and operated. The attainment rate of the five steps of ACP and the number of times the ACP process was repeated during hospitalization were evaluated for 79 inpatients before and after the introduction of the leaflet. Results: Forty-eight patients received decision-making support with the leaflet, while 31 did not. The rate of achievement of the discussion (38.7% vs 89.6%, p<0.001) and writing down (6.5% vs 33.3%, p=0.006) in ACP significantly increased after the introduction of the leaflet. Conclusion: The newly developed brain tumor-specific ACP leaflet was useful in promoting ACP for patients with brain tumors and providing decision support. In addition, a multidisciplinary ACP support framework for brain tumor patients has been established through ACP conferences.