Atrial fibrillation ( AF) is the most common cardi-ac arrhythmia in clinical practice, leading to significant morbidity, disability.Surgery treatment could achieve a good outcome, but not for all the AF patients.A considerable recurrence rate has partly been ascribed to atrial remodeling.We review the surgery treatment of AF, and discuss how to select appropriate patient by the clinical parameters and serum serum parameters, Osteoprotegerin ( OPG)/re-ceptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ( RANK)/RANK ligand ( RANKL) axis.

Objective To declare the unique anatomy,surgical management and prognosis of tetralogy of Fallot with subarterial ventricular septal defect (VSD). Methods From November 2002 to April 2009, 150 cases of typical tetralogy of Fallot were performed operations, 13 of which had subarterial VSD. Results Morphology and sites of right ventricular outflow obstruction in 13 cases: 2 cases isolated infundibular stenosis, 3 cases infundibular + pulmonary stenosis and 8 cases infundibular + pulmonary stenosis + valve ring stenosis. The diameter of subarterial VSD ranged from 1.5 to 3.0 cm. The proportion of aorta lying above the right ventricle varied from 30% to 50%. Twelve cases cured, one died of low cardiac output syndrome. Early postoperative mortality was 7.7% ( 1/13 ). The follow-up duration ranged from 1 month to 6 years. All cases had no cyanosis and the active ability were improved. Echo showed residual stenosis in 4 cases,residual VSD in 1 case and aortic regurgitation in 1 case. Conclusions Tetralogy of Fallot with subarterial VSD is associated with worse functional outcome. To prevent adverse outcomes, precise suturing of the distal ventricular septal patch, extensive infundibulectomy,lower threshold for transannular incision, and smaller-sized ventricular septal patch placement are warranted.

Objective: To explore the clinical effcacy and short-term survival rate of partial cardiac auto-transplantation for treating the patients with giant left atrium.
Methods: A total of 7 patients with rheumatic heart disease received partial cardiac auto-transplantation in our hospital from 2012-08 to 2013-05 were retrospectively studied. The patients were at the age of (54.9±5.0) years including 3 male, all of them combined with giant left atrium and pre-operative atrial ifbrillation (AF), 6 of them received radio-frequency ablation. All patients were monitored for their baseline condition, operative status, peri-operative mortality and complication occurrence for clinical analysis.
Results: All 7 patients received mitral valve replacement, 5 had aortic valve replacement and 2 had aortic valve-plasty, the mean aortic cross clamp time was (271.7±29.0) min. The average left atrial diameter decreased from (91.7±3.5) mm to (64.8±8.1) mm, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) improved from (38.3±6.5) % to (47.4±6.1) % at discharge, allP<0.05; 4 patients recovered to sinus rhythm and no peri-operative death occurred. The patients were followed-up for (20.7±3.9) months, 1 year post-operational survival rate was 100%, 1 patient died at 17 months after operation and the average left atrial diameter was (56.3±3.4) mm in rest 6 patients at the last examination during follow-up period.
Conclusion: Partial cardiac auto-transplantation may obviously reduce left atrial diameter with good clinical effect in certain patients with giant left atrium.

Objective To compare the efficacy of heart valve replacement(HVR) with axillary mini-thoractomy (AMT) and HVR with routine medial sternoctomy(MS). Methods The patients wre randomly divided into two groups. In group I 38 cases received HVR with routine MS, and in group II 49 cases received HVR with AMT. Results ⑴The surgical incision was invisible and cosmetic in group I and the volume of post-operative thoracic tube drainage was significantly less than that in group II; ⑵In group I the mean hospitalized days of the patients also was less than those in group II; ⑶There was no significant difference in cardiopumonary bypass time and aortic clamp time between the two groups. Conclusion Axillary mini-thoractomy could be used in most patients of heart valve replacement and has the advantage of the cosmetic and minimal injury.

Objective To analyse of 150 cases of type A aortic dissection anatomic parameter and the relationship between anatomic parameter and clinic date and prognosis.Methods We identified 150 cases of type A aortic dissection who were diagnosed clearly.All patients were divided into groups by gender and surgical approaches.General clinic data and radiological data were recorded.Survival rate was evaluated by follow up 3 months after surgery.Results The aortic root diameter of group aortic root replacement was(53.25±13.17)mm,group aortic root sparing was (49.08±6.94)mm,there was significant difference between the two group(P<0.05);survival rate was 86.84% and 79.79%,respectively.There was no relevance between diameter of aortic arch and branch with the aortic arch surgery way.The starting diameter of two group were (54.47±9.69)mm and(54.48±8.30)mm,the diameter of aortic arch were (31.39±7.14)mm and(32.73±6.59)mm,respectively.The anonymous artery diameter were (14.65±3.00)mm and(14.28±2.99)mm,respectively.The left common carotid artery diameter were(9.81±2.33)mm and(9.56±2.10)mm,respectively.The start diameter of the left subclavian artery were(11.15±2.84)mm and(11.13±2.56)mm(all P>0.05).There were gender differences between type A dissection parameters of descending aorta,the start diameter of male and female's descending aorta were (41.09±8.86)mm and(37.44±5.60)mm,respectively.The descending aorta in parallel to the pulmonary artery diameter were(34.31±0.59)mm and(31.11±0.88)mm,respectively.Descending aorta diameter of the diaphragm were(31.45±6.50)mm and(28.46±5.20)mm,respectively(all P>0.05).Conclusion In patients who suffer from type A aortic dissection,Parameter of aortic root is one of factors which determine surgical approach to aortic root.When treating descending aorta,surgeon should consider the influence of gender.Our study provided data references for selection and design of endovascular stent-graft.

Objective To evaluate the optimal management of cardiac surgery during pregnancy,in the second or third trimester,and the maternal and fetal outcomes in pregnant patients after surgery.Methods Six pregnant women with heart diseases were identified,who underwent cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass.Surgery was performed using cardiopulmonary bypass at mild hypothermia/normothermia,with pulsatile perfusion.Natural progesterone(20 mg)was added in priming solution,monitoring uterine contractions and heart rate changes.The mode of surgeries included mitral valve replacement+tricuspid valve plastic in three cases,aortic and mitral valve replacement+tricuspid valve plastic in one,left ventricular myxomatomy in one,left ventricular septal myectomy+artificial aortic valvular vegetations dissection+tricuspid valve plastic in one.Results The cardiopulmonary bypass and cross clamp time averaged 169 minutes(range,96~419 minutes)and 113 minutes(range,56~296 minutes),respectively.Five patients were alive.One maternal and fetal death occurred 6 h after surgery caused by heart failure and pulmonary edema.The other 5 patients terminated pregnancies after heart surgeries,one underwent with cesarean section 3 d after surgery in second trimester,two of whom with induction of labor,and two full-term labor(one with cesarean section,one with normal delivery).Two newborns were alive with no malformation.Conclusion Cardiopulmonary bypass can be used safely with satisfactory maternal and fetal outcomes in pregnant patients with heart disease undergoing cardiac surgery.

Objective To evaluate the efficiency and the timing of continuous blood purification(CBP) in patients with multiple or-gan dysfunction syndrome(MODS) and acute renal failure(ARF) following cardiac surgery. Methods From November,2003 to July,2007,thirty-one patients with MODS and ARF following cardiac surgery were treated with CBP. They were divided into two groups, alive group ( group A) and dead group ( group B). Clinical data of the two groups were reviewed. Before CBP, duration of extracorporeal circulation, du-ated. Mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), oxygenic index (PaO2/FiO2), white blood cell count (WBC), platelet count (PLT) and renal function (blood urea nitrogen, BUN, ercatinine, Cr) were observed before and after CBP. Results The number of im-paired organs of patients in group B was significantly more than that in group A before CBP ( P＜0.05). MODS scores ( 12.9±3.2 vs 6.9 ±2.3, P＜0.05) and APACHE Ⅱ scores (26.3±10.4 vs 17.2±5.1, P＜0.05)of group B were significantly higher than those of group A before CBP. After treatment of CBP for 24 hours, APACHE Ⅱ scores and MODS scores only significantly decreased in group A (P＜0.05 ). After treatment of CBP, Cr and BUN significantly reduced, while MAP and PaO2/FiO2 increased, in all patients, but HR was signif-icantly lower than that before CBP in group A (P＜0.05). The duration of ARF (34.67±32.79 hours vs 13.05±14.09 hours,P＜cantly higher than those of group A. Conclusion MODS scores and APACHE II scores can be used to evaluate the severity of patients with MODS and ARF after cardiac surgery. CBP is an effective treatment for these patients. It is suggested that early CBP therapy is important for reducing the chances of the multiple organ dysfunction syndrome and mortality of these patients.

Objective The prosthesis used for aortic valve replacement (AVR) can be too small in relation to body size,thus causing valve prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM).The aim of this article was to summarize the preventive strategy of PPM during AVR.Methods A total of 357 patients [203 males,154 females; mean age (54.9 ± 18.7 ) years ] underwent AVR between February.2010 and December 2011.The weight and body surface area (BSA) of the group is( 60.1 ± 11.4 )kg and (1.67 ± 0.21 )m2 respectively.The aortic valve prosthesis effective orifice area (EOA) was divided by body surface area (BSA) to obtain the EOA index (EOAI).PPM was then defined as none or mild if EOAI was ＞ 0.85 cm2/m2,as moderate for (0.65 - 0.85 ) cm2/m2 and as severe for ＜ 0.65 cm2/m2.To avoid PPM,a simple three-step algorithm was applied:Step 1,Calculate the patient's BSA from weight and height;Step 2,Calculate the minimal valve EOA required based on the BSA to ensure an EOAI ＞0.85 cm2/m2 ; Step 3,Select the type and size of prosthesis that has reference values for EOA greater or equal to the minimal EOA value obtained in step 2.For patients with a small aortic root,the following three methods was used:( 1 ) Replace aortic valve with simple interrupted suture technique ; (2) Apply new type and high-performance prosthetic valves such as St.Jude Medical Regent mechanical valve ; (3) Enlarge the narrowed aortic root when necessary.Results Of all 357 patients,272 patients received mechanical AVR and 85 bioprosthetic AVR.Among the 49 patients who received AVR with simple interrupted suture technique.St.Jude Medical Regent mechanical valve was implanted in 38 patients and the aortic root enlargement was performed in 11 patients.The total prevalence of PPM was 6.4％ and there was no severe PPM.The prevalence of PPM with mechanical AVR and bioprosthetic AVR was 1.8％ and 21.2％ respectively.There were 4 deaths during early period of operation,and the operative mortality was 1.1％.Conclusion Prosthesis-patient mismatch can be effectively prevented at the time of AVR with appropriate measurement.

Cardiac surgery carried out on cardiopulmonary bypass(CPB) in a pregnant woman is associated with poor neonatal outcomes although maternal outcomes are similar to cardiac surgery in non-pregnant women.Most adverse maternal and fetal outcomes from cardiac surgery during pregnancy are attributed to effects of CPB.The CPB is associated with utero-placental hypoperfusion due to a number of factors,which may translate into low fetal cardiac output,hypoxia and even death.Better maternal and fetal outcomes may be achieved by early pre-operative optimization of maternal cardiovascular status,use of perioperative fetal monitoring,optimization of CPB,delivery of a viable fetus before the operation and scheduling cardiac surgery on an elective basis during the second trimester.

Objective The prosthesis used for aortic valve replacement (AVR) may be too small in relation to the body size, thus causing valve prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) and abnormally high transvalvular pressure gradients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of PPM and the impact of PPM on hemodynamic and early mortality after AVR. Methods A total of 292 patients ( 167 males, 125 females; mean age of ( 52.8 ± 14.6 ) years, with ranging 22 - 82 years) who underwent AVR between January 2007 and December 2009 were retrospectively evaluated. Etiologies were: rheumatic in 243 cases, degenerative in 36, congenitally bicuspid aortic valve in 8, and infective endocarditis in 5. Combined operations with AVR including mitral valve replacement ( 172 cases), mitral valve repair (56 cases), tricuspid valve repair (238 cases), and coronary artery bypass grafting (32 cases). The aortic valve prosthesis effective valve orifice area (EOA) was divided by the body surface area (BSA) to obtain the EOA index (EOAI). PPM was then defined as none or mild if EOAI was ＞0.85 cm2/m2, as moderate for 0.65 -0.85 cm2/m2 and as severe for ＜0.65 cm2/m2. The mean flow rate through aortic prostheses and mean transvalvular pressure gradients were measured by color Doppler after AVR. The prevalence of PPM was compared between the different type ( mechanical or bioprosthetic valve) and the different size ( ＞21 mm or ≤21 mm) of aortic valve prostheses. The effect of PPM on hemodynamic and early mortality after AVR was also studied. Results 219 patients received mechanical AVR and 73 bioprosthetic AVR. Moderate PPM occurs more frequently with bioprosthetic AVR (6.25% versus 48.22%, P ＜0. 01 ). Bigger than 21mm prostheses were used in 191 patients and ≤21 mm prostheses in 101 patients. The prevalence of PPM was 13.61% and 33.66% respectively ( P ＜ 0. 05 ). According to the EOAI of the aortic valve prostheses,all the 219 patients were divided into two group, PPM group and non-PPM group. The mean flow rate of aortic prostheses and mean transvalvular pressure gradients in PPM group was significantly higher than those in non-PPM group [(2.66 ± 0.87 ) m/s versus ( 1. 58 ± 0.47 ) m/s, ( 26.50 ± 6.25 ) mm Hg versus ( 16.75 ± 3.46 ) mm Hg, P ＜ 0. 01]. There were 9 deaths during early period of operation, and the total 30-day operative mortality was 3.08%. The postoperative early mortality of PPM group and non-PPM group was 6.67% and 2.16% respectively, and there were significantly difference between the two group ( P ＜ 0. 05 ). Conclusion Prosthesis-patient mismatch is common present after AVR, especially in patients with bioprostheses and small size valve prostheses. PPM has a negative impact on postoperative hemodynamic and early mortality. PPM results in higher transvalvular pressure gradients and higher early mortality.