OBJECTIVETo investigate the etiologies and clinical features for bilateral acute sensorineural hearing loss (bi-ASNHL).

METHODSThe clinical data of 19 cases presenting with bi-ASNHL were retrospectively analyzed, including the clinical features, systemic examinations, laboratory examinations, audiology and radiology results, as well as the prognosis.

RESULTSThere were 15 non-otologic diseases in 19 patients, accounting for 78.9% of the total cases, most of which were disorders with multisystem and multi-organ disorder. The central nervous system diseases including fungal meningitis, tuberculous meningitis, and viral encephalitis in 3 patients. The clinical features of deafness were bilateral, progressive, accompanied with fever, headache, dizziness, nausea, vomiting and change of mental status. There was a decrease in speech recognition score (SRS), and speech recognition threshold (SRT) was obviously inferior to pure tone average (PTA) disproportionally. Diseases of immune system including antineural cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated systemic vasculitis (AASV), relapsing polychondritis (RP), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in 5 patients. They showed the characteristics of bilateral, progressive and simultaneous autoimmune disease. Hematological and endocrine system diseases including diabetes mellitus, leukemia, and thyroid hypofunction in 5 patients. The deafness had the characteristics of symmetry and progressivity. Otologic diseases including large vestibular aqueduct syndrome (LVAS) and sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) in 4 patients; Drug-induced sensorineural deafness happened in 2 patients. After the treatment aimed at the causes, 1 case was cured, 3 patients were markedly effective, 7 patients were effective, and 8 patients were ineffective(including dead and refusal cases), with a total effective rate of 57.9%.

CONCLUSIONSThe most of bi-ASNHL cases are often associated with systemic diseases. Clinicians should analyze the history and clinical characteristics in detail, and complete specific laboratory examinations, audiology and imaging examinations in order to reveal the causative diseases. It should be treated aimed at the etiology.

Autoimmune Diseases ; Deafness ; Hearing Loss, Bilateral ; diagnosis ; etiology ; Hearing Loss, Sensorineural ; diagnosis ; etiology ; Humans ; Retrospective Studies ; Syndrome ; Vertigo ; Vestibular Aqueduct

A ten-year-old boy with bilateral moderate sensorineural hearing loss underwent computerized tomographic (CT) imaging (GE Brightspeed, Wisconsin, USA) of the temporal bone as part of the work-up to determine the etiology of his condition. The formal radiologic interpretation of the scan stated that the vestibular aqueducts were not enlarged. However, independent review of the axial CT images appeared to indicate the presence of enlarged vestibular aqueducts. (Figure 1) This can be contrasted with a scan from another patient with no evidence of sensorineural hearing loss. (Figure 2) What can explain the discrepancy between the two? If simple visual inspection of the vestibular aqueduct (VA) can lead to conflicting interpretations, then what radiographic parameters can be used to resolve the issue? Is there a more objective means of determining the presence of a clinically significant vestibular aqueduct enlargement? In 1978, Valvasorri and Clemis1 first described an association between congenital sensorineural hearing loss and an abnormality in vestibular aqueduct anatomy which they labelled as the “large vestibular aqueduct syndrome.” In this landmark study that utilized hypocycloidal polytomographic temporal bone studies, they proposed that a vestibular aqueduct is enlarged when its midpoint diameter is greater than 1.5 mm. Although this parameter is generally considered to be the defining characteristic of the condition, one must realize that this measurement was based on less accurate imaging technology and measurement tools. Contemporary studies utilize high-resolution CT imaging with digital workstation measurement software to evaluate vestibular aqueduct anatomy. Currently, the two most commonly used radiographic parameters are the VA midpoint (MP) width and the VA opercular (OP) width. (Figure 3) More recently, Boston et al.2 in 2007 published normative values for these parameters based on a study population of 73 children without known sensorineural hearing loss. They considered a vestibular aqueduct enlarged when one or both of the measured widths were above the 95th percentile of the normal study group measurements. On this basis, a VA midpoint width of >0.9 mm and/or a VA opercular width of >1.9 mm was the criteria established to define an enlarged vestibular aqueduct. The patient’s measured vestibular aqueduct midpoint width on the right was 2.1 mm, while the vestibular aqueduct opercular width was 2.9 mm. (Figure 4) These measurements, when evaluated against either the original Valvassori criteria or the newer criteria of Boston et al., confirm what was visually apparent– the presence of a clinically significant enlargement of the vestibular aqueduct as the etiology of the patient’s sensorineural hearing loss.
Human ; Male ; Child ; Vestibular Aqueduct-etiology ; Temporal Bone-radiology ; Tomography Scanners, X-Ray Computed ; Hearing Loss, Sensorineural ; Congenital Abnormalities ;

BACKGROUNDLarge vestibular aqueduct syndrome (LVAS) is a major cause of hearing loss in childhood. This study aimed at measuring external aperture of enlargement of the vestibular aqueduct (EVA) and analyzing relationship between the size of external aperture and hearing loss.

METHODSDiagnostic criteria of LVAS were based on hearing loss and CT images. CT images of temporal bone of 100 LVAS patients were collected and 60 control subjects were reviewed retrospectively in the past 10 years. A battery of audiometric and vestibular function tests were performed. The width of the vestibular aqueduct (VA) was measured on axial CT images of the temporal bone.

RESULTSOne hundred patients (65 men, 35 women) were diagnosed as having the isolated EVA. Hearing loss mostly occurred in early childhood. The diagnosis age of LVAS was 7.7 years on average. The causes of hearing loss could not be confirmed by initial consult. Typically, audiometric curve is the high-frequency down-sloping configuration. 92% of the cases had severe or profound sonsorineural hearing loss (SNHL). The mean size of the external aperture was (7.5 +/- 1.2) mm in present LVAS. Statistical analysis showed that the degree of hearing loss is unrelated to the width of VA.

CONCLUSIONSLVAS is a distinct clinical entity characterized by fluctuating, progressive SNHL. The degree of hearing loss is unrelated to the size of external aperture of VA. The protective management and hearing aid have become the main therapies. The cochlear implantation might be performed if the hearing loss affected learning at school.

Adolescent ; Adult ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Diagnostic Errors ; Female ; Hearing Loss, Sensorineural ; etiology ; Humans ; Infant ; Male ; Retrospective Studies ; Syndrome ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Vestibular Aqueduct ; abnormalities ; pathology

OBJECTIVE: To explore the found ways and first diagnosis age of children with large vestibular aqueduct, and their relations with hearing loss. METHOD: Medical histories of 122 cases of children diagnosed with large vestibular aqueduct by HRCT or MRI had been collected from January 2009 to April 2014 in our hospital children's hearing diagnosis center clinic. Found ways comprise of accepting universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS) group and unaccepting UNHS group. Accepting UNHS children were divided into two ears unpassing group, single ear unpassing group and passing group. The patients in unaccepting UNHS group were divided into not sensitive to sounds, speech stunting, sudden hearing loss, and other group. Analysis the relationship between the found ways and first diagnosis age and their relations with hearing loss. RESULT: There are 84 cases (68.85%) accepting UNHS, the average age of first diagnosis was (17.24 ± 17.08) months; 37 cases (31.15%) are not accepting UNHS. The average age of first diagnosis was (30.92 ± 18.21) months. The average first diagnosis age of accepting UNHS group was more earlier than the unaccepting UNHS group. The difference was statistically signif- icant (P < 0.01). There were 57 cases (67.85%) whose two ears not pass UNHS; 15 cases (17.86%) single ear not pass; namely the referral rate was 85.71%; 12 cases (14.29%) pass the test. The first diagnosis age of passing UNHS group was more later than two ears unpassing group (P < 0.001). In the unaccepting UNHS group, the average first diagnosis age of not sensitive to sounds group (19.69 ± 11.16 months) was more earlier than words dysplasia group (37.13 ± 15.62 months) and sudden hearing loss group (47.40 ± 24.70 months) (P < 0.01). The difference in the degree of hearing loss between accepting UNHS and unaccepting UNHS group had no statistical significance (P > 0.05). In unaccepting UNHS group ,the average first diagnosis age of the mild-to-moderate hearing loss group was later than the very severe hearing loss group (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION Most of large vestibular aqueduct children can be found and receive diagnosis early by UNHS. But part of these patients with late-onset or progressive hearing loss, especially these with mild-to-moderate hearing loss cannot be found early, which should arouse our attention.
Child, Preschool ; Deafness ; Early Diagnosis ; Hearing Loss ; etiology ; Hearing Loss, Sudden ; Hearing Tests ; Humans ; Infant ; Infant, Newborn ; Neonatal Screening ; Vestibular Aqueduct ; abnormalities

OBJECTIVE: Analyze the data of the patients with sensorineural hearing loss in China and study the classification and incidence of inner ear malformationsby the high-resolution computed tomography. METHOD: The investigation took a retrospective review of CT findings relating to the 2,747 cases of outpatients. The inner ear malformations diagnosed by CT were classified according to the methods proposed by Sennaroglu. RESULT: (1)843 cases of inner ear malformations were found in 2747 cases of patients with sensorineural hearing loss by CT examination. The incidence of inner ear malformation was 30.69%(843/2747). (2) The epidemiological information of 843 cases of inner ear malformation according to Sennaroglu's classification was as follows: cochlea was 52. 31%(441/843), simple vestibular aqueduct was 40.33%(340/843), simple vestibular/ semicircular canal/internal auditory canal were 7. 35%(62/843) of the group. (3) 441 cases of cochlea malformation were consisted of these types of malformation: Michel deformity was 1.13% (5/441), cochlear aplasia was 1. 81% (8/441), common cavity deformity was 3. 17% (14/441), incomplete partition type I was 8. 62% (38/441), cochlea hypoplasia was 9. 07% (40/441) and incomplete partition type II was 76. 19% (336/441) of the group. CONCLUSION The results suggested that 30. 69% cases of inner ear malformation can be found in patients with sensorineural hearing loss, which is more higher than reported by the high-resolution computed tomography. Sennaroglu's classification is instructively significant in investigating the status of inner ear malformations.
China ; Cochlea ; Ear, Inner ; abnormalities ; Hearing Loss, Sensorineural ; etiology ; Humans ; Outpatients ; Retrospective Studies ; Semicircular Canals ; Temporal Bone ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Vestibular Aqueduct ; Vestibule, Labyrinth