1.Student Satisfaction with the Internal Medicine Diagnostics Course in the Physician program
Usukhbayar M ; Erdenekhuu N ; Enkhtur Ya ; Oyungoo B
Mongolian Journal of Health Sciences 2025;86(2):177-182
Background:
Medical education has undergone significant changes over the past few decades, with a focus on studentcentered
learning, problem-based learning, competency-based learning, and outcome-based education. Among these,
internal medicine diagnostics plays a crucial role in preparing students for clinical practice. However, there is limited
research on the factors influencing student satisfaction in this course. Studies by Harden et al. (1999) and Irby et al. (2010)
have emphasized the importance of continuous evaluation and effective teaching methods in medical education. This
study aims to assess student satisfaction with the internal medicine diagnostics course within the “Physician” program at
the Mongolian National University of Medical Sciences (MNUMS), aligning with these global trends.
Aim:
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate student satisfaction with the internal medicine diagnostics course
in the Physician program. Specific objectives include: Assessing satisfaction with the diagnostics course in the 2nd year
of the basic medical education program, evaluating satisfaction with the internal medicine diagnostics course in the 3rd
year, exploring the relationship between these two courses.
Materials and Methods:
This analytical study was conducted from June 2023 to June 2024, involving 1,167 students
enrolled in the “Physician” program at MNUMS. Data were collected using a 34-item questionnaire, including:Demographic
information (5 questions),General satisfaction (17 questions),Internal medicine diagnostics-specific satisfaction (12
questions). Satisfaction was measured using a 5-point Likert scale (1=strongly disagree, 5=strongly agree). Data were
analyzed using SPSS Statistics 26, employing descriptive statistics, ANOVA, T-tests, and regression analysis. Effect sizes
were calculated using Cohen’s d and Partial Eta Squared (η²), with statistical significance set at p<0.05.
Results:
Overall satisfaction: The average satisfaction score was 3.98±0.73. 2nd-year diagnostics course: Highest
satisfaction (4.07±0.90), particularly with “course content” (4.07±0.90). 3rd-year internal medicine diagnostics course:
Lowest satisfaction (3.97±0.78), especially with “learning environment” (3.90±0.90). Gender and Year Differences: No
significant gender-based differences (p>0.05). Satisfaction with the internal medicine diagnostics course decreased as
students progressed to higher years (B=-0.172, p=0.016). Course Relationship: A strong positive correlation was found
between the two courses (r=0.818, p<0.001), but the effect size was minimal (η²=0.008).
Conclusion
The above-average student satisfaction reflects the quality of the curriculum content and the effectiveness
of teaching methodologies. The decline in satisfaction with internal medicine courses as students progress may be due to
course difficulty and resource limitations. The weak correlation between the two subjects suggests the need for further
development of integrated learning.
2.The study of thyroid stimulating hormone effect in sperm quality
Dulguun Kh ; Munkhzol M ; Usukhbayar Ch ; Odkhuu E
Innovation 2020;14(2):28-33
Background:
Thyroid hormone disorders have an adverse effect on human spermatogenesis.
Thyroid function has regulated by hypothalamic-pituitary-thyroid axis and thyroid stimulation
hormone is a critical measurement of thyroid disorders. This study aimed to investigate the
relationship between thyroid stimulating hormone and sperm parameters.
Methods:
This study has conducted 99 man who have visited RMC and Ojinmed IVF centers.
Serum level of thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) was measured by automated immunoassay
analyzer (TOSOH AIA-360, Japan). Semen analysis was done in all the participants and evaluated
by World Health Organization’s guidelines(2010). Results were calculated by SPSS 26 program.
Results:
The average age was 35.2±5.76. The mean serum TSH level was 1.37±0.57 and 1.85±1.16
normal subjects and spermatogenesis dysfunction group, respectively. Furthermore, serum TSH
level and sperm parameters were significantly different between two groups (p<0.05). Logistical
regression analysis showed that increased TSH level negatively affected the motility (r=-0.28; p<0.05)
and progressive motility (r=-0.34;p<0.05) of sperm more than other parameters (r=-0.34; p=0.035).
There was no correlation between serum TSH and other sperm parameters. We analyzed binary
logistic regression for TSH with spermatogenesis dysfunction in case control groups. According to
the analysis, elevation of serum TSH level increases the risk of spermatogenesis dysfunction by 5.0
times (OR=5.06, p<0.05).
Conclusions
Subclinical hypothyroidism adversely affect some sperm parameters, including
motility and progressive motility. Subclinical hypothyroidism increases the risk of spermatogenesis
dysfunction.
3.Medical Students’ Evaluation of the Outcomes of the Undergraduate Medical Education Program
Usukhbayar M ; Erdenekhuu N ; Enkhtur Ya ; Oyungoo B
Mongolian Journal of Health Sciences 2025;87(3):206-214
Background:
Modern medical education increasingly integrates Outcome-
Based Education (OBE) and Problem-Based Learning (PBL) approaches
to improve training quality. The Mongolian National University of Medical
Sciences (MNUMS) implemented an OBE curriculum in 2013, creating a need
to examine student satisfaction as a measure of program effectiveness. Student
satisfaction is recognized as a key indicator of educational quality and
is linked to outcomes such as graduate retention and institutional reputation.
Aim:
To assess the level of student satisfaction in the medical doctor (MD)
training program and identify factors influencing it, in order to provide a basis
for improving training quality.
Materials and Methods:
A cross-sectional survey was conducted in 2023–
2024 among 1167 students (third- to sixth-year MD students) at MNUMS. Participants
had a mean age of 22.2 ± 1.5 years, and 79.9% were female. A questionnaire
with 23 questions (including 16 Likert-scale items on satisfaction)
was administered; responses were given on a 5-point Likert scale. Data were
analyzed using SPSS version 26. Descriptive statistics, independent t-tests,
one-way ANOVA, Pearson correlation analysis, exploratory factor analysis,
and multiple linear regression were performed. All statistical tests were twotailed,
and significance was set at p<0.05.
Results:
The satisfaction survey demonstrated high internal consistency
(Cronbach’s α = 0.927). Overall satisfaction with the training program was
moderately high, with a mean score of 3.51 ± 0.84 out of 5. Fourth-year students
reported the highest satisfaction with teaching methods (mean 3.97 ±
0.67), whereas third-year students gave the lowest rating for the sufficiency
of learning materials (mean 2.98 ± 1.01); these differences were statistically
significant (p<0.001). Additionally, satisfaction with clinical training declined by
the final year of study, with a mean rating of 3.16 in the sixth year compared
to 3.70 in the third year (p<0.001). No significant difference in overall satisfaction
was observed between male and female students (p>0.05). Exploratory
factor analysis (KMO = 0.950; Bartlett’s test p<0.001) identified two key underlying
factors influencing perceived training quality, which together explained
55.83% of the total variance: (1) “Curriculum organization and teaching methodology,”
and (2) “Material resources and learning environment.” Correlation
and regression analyses further indicated that better course organization and
active teacher engagement were associated with higher student satisfaction
(p<0.01).
Conclusion
The study shows that enhancing teaching methods and improving
curriculum coherence are needed to further improve the quality of the
MD training program. Additionally, strengthening educational resources and
updating instructional approaches are crucial for raising satisfaction levels,
particularly for senior (sixth-year) students. These findings provide an evidence-
based foundation for curriculum and policy improvements to boost student
satisfaction and overall educational outcomes.
4.ASSESSING EDUCATIONAL ENVIRONMENT IN NURSING SCHOOL OF MNUMS
Khangai E ; Usukhbayar M ; Bayarbat G ; Oyuntsetseg S ; Bolorsaikhan O ; Oyungoo B
Innovation 2017;11(2):77-80
BACKGROUND. To evaluate educational environment, it is important to use confidential
and accepted tool. Dundee Ready Education Environment Measure (DREEM) (3) is a
globally accepted and widely used tool to measure the education environment. Regular
assessment of educational environment to evaluate teachers’ teaching method, students’
perception and their outcome and making the necessary adjustment to it is one of the factors
affecting students’ knowledge, clinical practice and their motivation (4). In the MNUMS
program, educational environmental assessment is one of the most important parts and
we are unaware of any report of research work. Therefore, the researchers decide to carry
this study. AIM OF THE STUDY. This study aimed to evaluate the educational environment
in Nursing school of MNUMS using globally accepted DREEM Questionnaire.
MATERIALS AND METHODS. This cross-sectional analytic study was carried out in Faculty
of Nursing in Darkhan, Dornogobi and Gobi-Altai aimag out of 9 branch school of
MNUMS during the academic year 2015-2016 and 2016-2017. DREEM questionnaire was
used to collect data from 306 nursing students. RESULT. Most of the participants were
female accounted around 89.9% (275) and male were 10.1% (31). By age, age of 17-19
were 25.5%(78), 20-22 were 52.0% (159), 23-25 were 15.0%(46), >26 were 7.5% (23). The
mean item score was highest in Dornogobi school of 3.8 and lowest in Nursing school of
3.6. 4th year students’ 68.6% (210) agreed to “more on positive side” for their academic
self perception and 22.5% (69) agreed “moving in right direction” for their academic self
perception. All domains were statistically significant specially the perception of curriculum
(0.854**) and perception of learning (0.803**) have high correlation. On the other hand,
perception of educational atmosphere (0.444**) and perception of teachers have moderate
correlation. The reliability of questionnaire was confirmed by Cronbach alpha and it is
counted as reliable if it is more than 0.7. The perception of curriculum was relatively low in
2nd year students but higher in 3rd year students. The perception of educational atmosphere
was relatively low in 4th year students but higher in 1st year students.
CONCLUSION. The nursing school program is in same level. Students are satisfied with
their academic self perception and perception of teachers. The result showed that 68.2%
(209) of students consider positive aspect of educational environment (p<0.001). Students
of all 4 school of MNUMS with same level of nursing school program are satisfied with
their knowledge, clinical skills and educational atmosphere among the students. Dornogobi
school students’ 65% assessed perception of teacher as “model instruction”.