Objective To investigate the clinical value of preoperative lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio(LMR)in evaluating the prognosis of patients with stage T1 non-muscle invasive bladder cancer(NMIBC).Methods A total of 215 patients with stage T1 NMIBC who underwent transurethral resection of bladder tumor were enrolled.Clinical data were collected.Patients were followed up and their disease-free survival(DFS)and overall survival(OS)were recorded.The receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve of preoperative LMR in detecting patient prognosis was used to determine the optimal cut-off value for LMR.Patients were divided into low LMR group(LMR <3.86,=77)and high LMR group(LMR ≥ 3.86,=138).Kaplan-Meier survival curves were explored to compare cumulative DFS and OS rates in patients with different LMR levels,and COX proportional hazards regression model was used to analyze factors associated with DFS and OS.Results All these 215 patients with T1 stage NMIBC were followed up for 2-92 months,and the DFS rate was 59.07% and OS rate was 65.12%.Kaplan-Meier curves showed that the cumulative DFS rate(=4.784,=0.029)and cumulative OS rate(=7.146, =0.008)in the low LMR group were significantly lower than those in the high LMR group.Tumor size ≥ 3 cm(=1.398,95% :1.042-1.875,=0.025),pathological grade G3(=1.266,95% :1.026-1.563,=0.028),and LMR ≥ 3.86(=2.347,95% :1.080-5.101,=0.031)were independent factors associated with DFS in patients with stage T NMIBC.In addition,tumor size ≥ 3 cm(=1.228,95% :1.015-1.484,=0.034),pathological grade G3(=1.366,95% :1.017-1.834,=0.038),and LMR<3.86(=2.008,95% :1.052-3.832,=0.035)were independent factors associated with OS in patients with T1 stage NMIBC. Conclusion Preoperative LMR is an independent factor associated with patients' prognosis in T1 stage NIMBC.Patients with low LMR tend to have higher risk of NMIBC progression and death.
Disease-Free Survival ; Humans ; Lymphocytes ; cytology ; Monocytes ; cytology ; Prognosis ; Retrospective Studies ; Survival Rate ; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms ; diagnosis ; pathology

To evaluate the ability of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in detecting bladder urothelial carcinoma (BUC), FISH and cytology were compared for the evaluation of 308 consecutive urine samples from patients suspected of having BUC. All patients underwent cystoscopy for identification of bladder lesions. The FISH results were compared with the cytology assessment. In all, 122 patients had confirmed BUC. Among them, 68 (55.7%) were FISH-positive, while only 33 (27%) were positive on cytology. According to disease stage (superficial vs. invasive) and grade (low vs. high), the sensitivities of FISH were also significantly higher than those of cytology in all categories. Moreover, in 36 patients who had no visible tumor with flat, erythematous mucosa (suspicious lesion), FISH was more sensitive than cytology for the detection of BUC (83.3% vs. 33.3%, P=0.002). The FISH was negative in 168 (90.3%) of 186 patients with no histological evidence of BUC or negative cystoscopy findings. The sensitivity of FISH for detecting BUC was superior to that of cytology, regardless of tumor stage and grade. FISH is a significant additional and complementary method for detection of BUC in patients who have suspicious lesions on cystoscopy.
Aged ; Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/diagnosis/*pathology ; Female ; Humans ; *In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence/methods ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/*diagnosis/pathology ; Urine/cytology ; Urothelium/*pathology

OBJECTIVE: To determine the validity of NMP-22 (Bladder Check Protein Test Pack Kit) in the diagnosis of bladder cancer.

MATERIALS: From May 1, 2009 to October 31, 2009 all patients with bladder mass by ultrasound, IVP or CT scan from three different urology training institutions were enrolled in this prospective study. These patients underwent urine cytology and NMP-22 qualitative assay. The diagnosis determined from the cytoscopic and histopathologic findings from CTURBT was accepted as the gold standard.

RESULTS: Thirty nine subjects were enrolled in this study, whom of 31 patients were diagnosed of malignancy and 8 were benign in pathology. The sensitivity of urine cytology, NMP-22 assay and cytoscopy was 34.6%, 96.8% and 92.3% respectively and the specificity was 37.5% for NMP-22 and 66.1% for the cytoscopy.

CONCLUSION: The result of this study suggests that NMP-22 is a very sensitive test, however is less specific in identifying bladder cancer.

Human ; Male ; Female ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasms ; Urologic Neoplasms ; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms-cytology, diagnosis, pathology ; nuclear matrix protein 22 ; ultrasonography ; Tomography Scanners, X-Ray Computed ; ;

BACKGROUND: Screening of high-risk patients using bladder tumor markers can offer an advantage of early detection and saving medical costs. For these purpose many tumor markers have been developed to supplement invasive cystoscopy. Our study evaluated the NMP22 point-of-care test (NMP22 POCT), which is one of the tumor makers, comparing with the standard urine cytology for the diagnosis of bladder cancer. METHODS: From January to September 2005, 232 patients who had undergone a cystoscopy due to bladder cancer associated symptoms including hematuria and dysuria were enrolled in this study. Urine specimens were collected for NMP22 POCT and cytology. NMP22 POCT and urine cytology were compared for sensitivity and specificity. In addition, we evaluated urine stick test and microscopy to explain some false-positive results in NMP22 POCT. RESULTS: Superficial transitional cell carcinoma was diagnosed in 10 patients. The sensitivity of NMP22 test was 60% (95% confidence interval [CI], 26.2-87.8%), whereas that of cytology was 33.3% (95% CI, 7.5-70.1%); however, the difference was not significant. The specificity of NMP22 test was 69.8% (95% CI, 63.3-75.8%), compared with 99.0% (95% CI, 96.5-99.9%) for cytology (P<0.001). The presence of microscopic RBCs in urine specimen was significantly associated with the lower specificity of NMP22 POCT (P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: NMP22 POCT was significantly less specific than urine cytology. To be useful as a bladder cancer screening test, the NMP22 test should have a higher specificity.
Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Nuclear Proteins/*urine ; Point-of-Care Systems ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Tumor Markers, Biological/*urine ; Urinary Bladder/pathology ; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/*diagnosis/urine ; Urine/cytology

PURPOSE: To investigate the usefulness of urine cytology in the detection of tumor recurrence in terms of practicality and cost-effectiveness. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 393 patients who underwent transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) from January 2010 to June 2013. All patients underwent cystoscopy, urine cytology, urinalysis, and computed tomography (CT) at 3 and 6 months after TURBT. In 62 cases, abnormal bladder lesions were identified on cystoscopy within 6 months. Suspicious lesions were confirmed pathologically by TURBT or biopsy. Patients were grouped by modalities: group I, urine cytology; group II, CT; group III, urinalysis; group IV, urine cytology plus CT; group V, urine cytology plus urinalysis; group VI, CT plus urinalysis; group VII, combination of all three modalities. Each group was compared by cost per cancer detected. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients were confirmed to have tumor recurrence and 13 patients were confirmed to have inflammation by pathology. The overall tumor recurrence rate was 12.5% (49/393) and recurrent cases were revealed as NMIBC. Sensitivity in group I (24.5%) was lower than in group II (55.1%, p=0.001) and group III (57.1%, p<0.001). However, in group VII (77.6%), the sensitivity was statistically similar to that of group VI (75.5%, p=0.872). Under the Korean insurance system, total cost per cancer detected for group VII was almost double that of group VI (p=0.041). CONCLUSIONS: Routine urine cytology may not be useful for follow-up of bladder cancer in terms of practicality and cost-effectiveness. Application of urine cytology needs to be adjusted according to each patient.
Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Cost-Benefit Analysis ; Cystoscopy/economics ; Cytodiagnosis/economics/methods ; Female ; Health Care Costs/*statistics & numerical data ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/*diagnosis/economics/pathology ; Neoplasm Staging ; Republic of Korea ; Retrospective Studies ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed/economics ; Urinalysis/economics/methods ; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/*diagnosis/economics/pathology/surgery ; Urine/*cytology

BACKGROUND: For the detection of transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the bladder, we compared the sensitivities and specificities between the ThinPrep test and Melanoma Antigen Gene (MAGE) test with voided urine (V), drained urine (D), and irrigated urine (I). METHODS: We randomly selected 10 patients of a non-cancer group and 20 patients of a cancer group. V, D, and I were obtained preoperatively, and equally divided into two parts for the ThinPrep test and MAGE reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The cystoscopic finding was used as the reference standard for detection of bladder cancer. The results of ThinPrep test and MAGE RT-PCR were compared according to cancer grade and stage. RESULTS: The overall sensitivities of ThinPrep test were 45%, 85% and 85% for V, D, and I, respec-tively, while those of MAGE test were 50%, 85%, and 65%. Detection rate from drainage urine was considerably higher than that of voided urine in both methods (P<0.05). The specificities were 100% for all types of urine specimens with ThinPrep test and 100%, 90%, and 90% for V, D, and I, respectively, using MAGE test, without any statistically significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: For the detection of bladder cancer, MAGE RT-PCR and ThinPrep test showed a comparable sensitivity and specificity, and drained urine revealed the best detection rate. MAGE RT-PCR might be utilized as another marker of bladder cancer using urine specimens.
Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Antigens, Neoplasm/*genetics ; Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/*diagnosis/pathology ; Cytodiagnosis/*methods ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Proteins/*genetics ; RNA, Neoplasm/urine ; Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/*methods ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Urinalysis ; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/*diagnosis/pathology ; Urine/*cytology