Objective To study the ultrastructural changes in three different zones of benign prostatic hyperplasia(BPH). Methods The ultrastructural changes in peripheral,transitional and central zones(PZ,TZ and CZ)of prostates from 10 patients with BPH were observed with transmission electron microscopy. Results Glandular epithelia layers in TZ of BPH were increased.The stroma in TZ was mainly composed of smooth muscle cells (SMC) of vigorous proliferation and fibroblasts.Mast cell and lymphocyte with cytoplasma membrane merge were observed in this zone.In PZ and CZ of BPH, SMC showing degenerative changes,such as,nuclear pyknosis,dilatation of perinuclear space and vacuolation of cytoplasma were frequently seen. Conclusions There are significant differences in the ultrastructure of three zones in BPH.

Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of terlipressin for septic shock.Methods A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled pilot study was carried out in the general ICU of the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from June 1st 2015 to May 31st 2016.The septic shock patients with a mean arterial pressure below 65 mmHg despite adequate volume resuscitation were enrolled.Patients were randomized (random number) to give continuous infusions of either terlipressin[0.6-2.6 μg/(kg·h)] or norepinephrine(7-30 μg/min).Open label norepinephrine or other catecholamines were additionally infused if the mean arterial pressure failed to reach 65 mmHg.Treatment was continued until shock corrected,death or withdrawn from this study.Correcting rate of shock was the primary end point,the secondary end points included open labeled norepinephrine requirements,the 28 d survival rate and adverse events.The quantitative data of the two groups were compared by t test or Wilcoxon rank sum test.The enumeration data were compared by chi square test or Fisher exact probability method,and the survival data were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier method.Results A total of 28 patients were enrolled.The full analysis set was 28,the per-protocol set was 25,and the safety set was 28.The key demographics and baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups(P＞0.05).The results for the per-protocol set were followed up.The correcting rate of shock between the two groups were similar at the end of treatment[81.82％(9/11)vs.57.14％(8/14),P=0.190].The open label norepinephrine requirements of the trial group and control group for the 0,6,12,24,48 h time point were 0.661,0.921,1.583,1.241,2.143,1.371,1.071,1.261,0.370,1.001 μg/(kg·min),respectively with no significant difference(P＞0.05).The 28 d survival rate of the trial group and control group were 63.64％(7/11)and 50.00％(7/14) respectively with no statistical significance(P＞0.05).There was no significant difference in 28 d survival analyzed using Kaplan-Meier plot between two groups(P=0.470).There were two patients with ischemia of fingers,one patient with hyponatraemia and one patient with ischemia of intestine accompanied by hyponatraemia occurred after treatment with terlipressin,and one patient with isehemia of fingers occurred after treatment with norepinephrine.The incidence of adverse event for the trial group and control group were 30.77％(4/13) and 6.67％(1/15) with no significant difference(P=0.122).Conclusions Terlipressin is an effective agent for treating septic shock.The total adverse event rate of terlipressin was similar to that ofnorepinephrine.

Objective:To analyze the efficacy and safety of nalbuphine for analgesia in patients with non-mechanical ventilation in intensive care unit (ICU).Methods:From December 2018 to August 2021, a multicenter randomized controlled clinical study was conducted to select non-mechanical ventilation patients with analgesic needs admitted to ICU of four hospitals in Henan Province and Guizhou Province. Patients were randomly assigned to nalbuphine group and fentanyl group. The nalbuphine group was given continuous infusion of nalbuphine [0.05~0.20 mg/(kg·h)], and the fentanyl group was given continuous infusion of fentanyl [0.5~2.0 μg/(kg·h)]. The analgesic target was critical-care pain observation tool (CPOT) score<2. The observation time was 48 hours. The primary endpoint was CPOT score, the secondary endpoints were Richmond agitation-sedation score (RASS), ICU length of stay, adverse events, and proportion of mechanical ventilation. The quantitative data of the two groups were compared by t test or Mann-Whitney U test. The enumeration data were compared by chi square test or Fisher exact probability method. The data at different time points between groups were compared by repeated measures analysis of variance. Results:A total of 210 patients were enrolled, including 105 patients in the nalbuphine group and 105 patients in the fentanyl group. There was no significant difference in baseline data between the two groups (all P>0.05). There was no significant difference in CPOT score between nalbuphine group and fentanyl group at each time point after medication ( P>0.05), the CPOT score of both groups at each time point after medication was significantly lower than that before medication, and the analgesic target could be achieved and maintained 2 hours after medication. There was no significant difference in RASS between the two groups at each time point after medication ( P>0.05), which was significantly lower than that before medication, and the target sedative effect was achieved 2 hours after medication. There was no significant difference in ICU length of stay between nalbuphine group and fentanyl group [5.0(4.0,7.5) d vs. 5.0(4.0,8.0) d, P=0.504]. The incidence of delirium, nausea and vomiting, abdominal distension, pruritus, vertigo and other adverse events in the nalbuphine group was lower than that in the fentanyl group (all P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of other adverse events such as deep sedation, hypotension and bradycardia between the two groups (all P>0.05). The incidence of respiratory depression in nalbuphine group was not significantly different from that in fentanyl group ( P>0.05), but the proportion of mechanical ventilation was significantly lower than that in the fentanyl group [1.9% (2/105) vs. 8.6%(9/105), P=0.030]. Conclusions:Nalbuphine could be used for analgesia in ICU patients with non-mechanical ventilation. The target analgesic effect could be achieved within 2 hours, and it had a certain sedative effect with a low incidence of adverse reactions.