Objective To compare the dosimetry of three different radiation therapy plans [threedimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT),intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT),intensity modulated arc radiotherapy (IMAT)].Methods Selected 15 cases with middle thoracic esophageal cancer,Varian Eclipse 8.6 planning systems were designed with 3DCRT,IMRT,IMAT,3DCRT using 5-8 coplanar radiation fields,IMRT using 7 coplanar radiation fields,IMAT using 2 radians.Three planned dose difference were compared.Results Compared with 3DCRT,IMRT and IMAT were better with heterogeneity index (HI),conformality index (CI),VPTV 95 ％,V5,V20,V35 of total lung,and V30 of heart (t =2.531,P＜ 0.05).There was no statistically significant difference for the V10,V15,V25,V30 mean dose of total lung,the mean dose of heart,the maximum dose of spinal cord,and the minimum dose of PTV among the three plans (t =1.325,P ＞0.05).Conclusion IMAT and IMRT are similar in the middle thoracic esophageal cancer radiotherapy target volume dose coverage and organs at risk protection,they are better than 3DCRT.IMAT in the monitor units and delivery time are less than IMRT.

ObjectiveTo study the efficacy of using multileaf collimators with different position and different degree in the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) using intensity-modulated radiotherapy techniques.Methods Ten patients withNPC were administered andanalyzed.Thepenumbra characteristics, dose of target, and radiation conformal indexes (CI) of mode T1 and mode T2 were measured and compared using dose volume histogram generated by Varian Eclipse three-dimensional planning computer system. Mode T1 :The angles of seven coplanar beams were 0°, 52°, 106°, 160°, 212°, 258°and 308°,respectively. There were no restriction on the position and degree of multileaf collimators. Parameters were set and optimized. Mode T2 :The beam angles and the parameters were as same as mode T1. According to the actual situations, the position and the degree of the multileaf collimators were changed. Then thedose optimization was performed. Results Target dose coverage in both mode T1 and T2 could be clinically accepted, and the CI were 0. 82 and 0. 83(t = -0. 25, P =0. 815). The maximum dose reductions in the lens, eyes, optic nerves and corneas were 28. 7% (t = 4. 80, P = 0. 000), 2. 7% (t = 2. 99, P = 0. 021),1.4%(t= 1.05,P=0.032), and 30.5% (t=2.99,P=0. 020), respectively. However, the mean dose and V35 of the parotid were increased by 0. 6% (t = - 2. 82, P = 0. 043) and 9.9% (t = - 2. 05, P =0. 038). ConclusionsOpimization of multileaf collimators can reduce the scattering and leaking rays. Compared with mode T1 ,controlling the position and degree of multileaf collimators could reduce the radiation dose to the eyes and optic-nerves, especially to the lens.

Objective Using Eclipse and Pinnacle3 V 7.4f treatment planning sytems (TPS) for dose calculation of the CT images of simulation phantom,patients and homogeneous organization phantom,to compare the differences between the two TPS for the calculation of non-uniform organizations.Methods For the CT images of simulation phantom,patients and homogeneous organization phantom,the calculating results between the two TPS were compared,including the common used clinical indexes of V20 and V30 of the lung,D95 of the planning target volume,the doses of the ISO and eight points of interest inside ISO slice.Resuits For simulation phantom and patients,although the calculating differences of the isocenter doses between the two TPS were small,the differences of other indicators were large.For example,when using secondary collimator irradiation,the maximal D95 difference of planning target volume reached 10.17%for patients and 4.64%for simulation phantom.When using muhileaf collimator irradiation,the maximal D95 difference reached 10.74%for patients and 5.66%for simulation phantom.Sometimes the dose differences of points 1-4 at the edge of planning target volume were more than 10%.In addition,the V30 differences of the lung were large too.But for the homogeneous organization phantom,the calculating differences were small.Conclusions The calculating differences between the two TPS are less for simulation phantom than for patients,and more for simulation phantom and patients than for homogeneous organization phantom.

Objective To evaluate the validity of narrow-band imaging (NBI) system in detection of colorectal adenoma, as compared to that of endoscopy of the colon and rectum, in a systematic review. Methods Relevant literatures were retrieved from Medline (January 1966 to October 2008), OVID (January 1996 to October 2008), EMBASE (January 1980 to October 2008), Coehrane Library (Issue 3, 2008) and Chinese Biological Medicine Disk (CBM disk, January 1997 to October 2008). Quality of the literatures retrieved was assessed based on the Cochrane Reviewers' Handbook and Jadad's score. RevMan version 4. 2 software was used for meta-analysis. Results Seven randomized clinical trials (2838 patients) were included in the study. Compared with white-light colonoscopy, no significant difference was observed in terms of adenoma detection rate (OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.00-1.39, P=0.06) by NBI system, which could significantly improve total number of detection for fiat lesions of the colon and rectum (pooled WMD 0.14, 95% CI 0.02-0.26, P=0.02), but with a longer withdrawn time (pooled WMD 1.05, 95% CI 0.08-1.22, P<0.01). Conclusions Detection rate for flat lesions of the colon and rectum, not for adenoma, can be improved by NBI system and meanwhile its withdrawn time is prolonged, indicating that routine use of NBI system for detecting colorectal adenomas may be recommended only with its further refined technique.

0.05).The variced recurrence rate in 1- and 2-year were 12% (3/25) and 20% (5/25) in TH glue group,and 39.1% (9/23) and 86.9%(20/23) in control group (P

Objective To explore the effect of respiration on dose accumulation for target volume and normal liver in radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) while applying 4D-CT and deformable registration.Methods Nineteen HCC patients who had received transcatheter arterial chemoembolization were enrolled in this study.All patients underwent 3D-and 4D-CT simulation in free breathing.The 3D dose (Dose-3D) was calculated from the treatment planning designed on the 3D-CT image.The Dose-3D then was recalculated on ten phases of 4D-CT images respectively,and the end-inspiration and end-expiration doses were defined as Dose El and Dose-EE.The 4D dose (Dose-4D) was obtained by deforming and accumulating ten-phase doses of 4D-CT images on the end-expiration phase image.The dosimetric differences of planning target volume and normal liver were compared among Dose-3D,Dose-4D,Dose-EI and Dose-EE.Results The D99 and D95of planning target volume (PTV) in Dose-3D were higher than those of Dose-4D,Dose-Fl and Dose EE (x2 =32.75,26.31,P ＜ 0.05).The conformal index (CI) and homogeneity index (HI) in Dose-3D were better than those of Dose-4D,Dose-E1 and Dose-EE,in which CI decreased from 0.78 to0.63,0.60 and 0.57,while HI increased from 0.08 to 0.15,0.16 and 0.19 (x2 =37.80,31.86,P ＜0.05).No statistically significant differences were found in dosimetric indices of PTV between Dose-4D and Dose EI,Dose-EE,and between Dose-El and Dose-EE (P ＞ 0.05).The mean dose (D),V5,V10,V20,V30 and V40 of normal liver were similar among four dose distributions (P ＞ 0.05).Conclusions More objective and precise dose distribution for target volume and normal liver could be obtained by applying both 4D-CT and deformable registration,which is beneficial to accurately predicting the dosevolume indices of radiation-induced liver injury and offering more reliable evidence of escalation for target dose.

Objective To compare the dosimetric differences of target volume and organ at risk between intensity-modulated arc therapy (IMAT) and simultaneously integrated boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy (SIB-IMRT) in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Methods IMAT and SIB-IMRT treatment plans of 10 nasopharyngeal carcinoma cases were generated by Varian Eclipse ver8. 6 treatment planning system. The dosimetric parameters of target volume and organ at risk (OAR), the monitor units (MU) and treatment time were compared between IMAT and SIB-IMRT treatment plan. Results The conformal index ( CI ) of PTV, PTV1, PTV2 of IMAT and SIB-IMRT were 0. 71 and 0. 75 ( Z = - 2. 32, P ＜ 0. 05 ), 0. 54 and 0. 59 (Z= -2.56,P＜0.05), 0.71 and 0.78(Z= -2.52,P＜0.05), respectively. the homogenous index (HI) of PTV, PTV1, PTV2 of IMAT and SIB-IMRT were 10.5 and 11.2(Z= -0. 84,P＞0.05),13. 1 and 17. 1(Z= -1.68,P＞0.05) and 14. 1 and 13.3(Z= -1. 01,P＞0.05) respectively;the brain-stem mean does were 3512. 8 cGy ± 406. 2 cGy and 3384. 3 cGy ± 361.3 cGy ( Z= - 1.82, P ＞ 0. 05 ); the brain-stem maximum dose were 5528. 1cGy ± 192. 9 cGy and 5727. 5 cGy ± 356. 3 cGy ( Z = - 1.12, P ＞ 0. 05 ); the maximum dose of spinal-cord were were 4186. 1cGy ± 88.7 cGy and 4390. 2 cGy ± 74. 9 cGy ( Z =-2. 38 ,P ＜ 0. 05 ). There were no significant differences between parotid dose and normal tissue ( P ＞0. 05. ) MU were 606 ± 96 and 1308 ± 213 for IMAT and SIB-IMRT ( Z= - 2. 52, P ＜ 0. 05 ). Conclusions The IMAT plan showed a better conformal index than SIB-IMRT plan, with the same dosimetric parameters of the target volume and OAR. The IMAT plan could reduce normal tissues dose, monitor units and treatment time in the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Objective To compare the dosimetric difference of RapidArc and fixed gantry IMRT for liver carcinoma.Methods The CT data of 10 liver cancer patients were used to design 3 groups of treatment plan:IMRT plan,single arc RapidArc plan(RA1) ,and dual arc RapidArc plan(RA2).The planning target volume (PTV) dosimetric distrubition,the organs at risk (OAR) dose,the normal tissue dose,mornitor units(MU) and treatment time were compared.Results The maximum dose of PTV in RA1 and RA2 plans were lower than that of IMRT(Z = -2.090,-2.666,P ＜ 0.05).RapidArc groups had an improved 90% prescription dose conformity index than IMRT(Z = -2.805,-2.809 ,P ＜ 0.05).For organs at risk,RapidArc group plan had a significantly lower dose in V40 of stomach and small bowel than I MRT plan,but higher in mean dose of left kidney (Z = -1.988,-2.191,P ＜ 0.05).The values of V5,V10 and V15 of healthy tissue in RapidArc plan groups were higher than those in IMRT plan,while the values of V20 ,V25 and V30 of healthy tissue in RapidArc plan groups were lower than those in IMRT plan.The number of computed MU/fraction of Rapid Arc plan was 40% or 46% of IMRT plan and the treatment time was 30% and 40% of IMRT.Conclusion RapidArc showed improvements in conformity index and healthy tissue sparing with uncompromised target coverage.RapidArc could lead to the less MU and shorter delivery time compared to IMRT.

Objective To explore the influence of delineator and contouring criteria training on the delineation of the tumor bed and whole breast target after breast-conserving surgery.Methods Twelve brcast cancer patients after breast conserving surgery were selected.Tumor bed marked by clips was defined as gross target volume 1 (GTV1),tumor bed formed by seroma was defined as GTV2 and the whole breast was defined as clinical target volume (CTV).Five junior radiation oncologists first delineated GTV1,GTV2 and CTV for each patient following their own criteria.After contouring criteria training,they then delineated GTV1,GTV2 and CTV for the same group of patients again.The differences of the volumes of GTV1,GTV2 and CTV before and after training among different delineators were compared.One-way ANOVA or matching t-test was performed.Results The inter-delineator variability on GTV1,GTV2 and CTV delineation before training was statistically significant (F =11.16,7.54 and 3.78,P =0.000,0.000 and 0.009).After training,the inter-delineator variability on GTV1 and GTV2 delineation had statistical significance (t =4.78 and 4.24,P =0.002 and 0.005),but the inter-delineator variability on CTV delineation had no statistical significance (t =1.52,P =0.209).The coefficient of variance of the GTV1,GTV2 and CTV before and after training was significantly different (t =3.14,2.81,2.70,P =0.009,0.017 and 0.021).The matching index of GTV1,GTV2 and CTV before and after training was significantly different (F =16.08,8.61,8.48,P =0.000,0.000 and 0.000).Conclusions In delineating the target of breast cancer,application of the criteria of target delineation can reduce the difference among the delineators,especially for CTV.

Objective To investigate the down stage effect and long-term results of preoperative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced lower rectal adenocarcinoma. Methods From Jan. 1989 to Jul 1999, 103 patients suffering from lower rectal carcinoma were treated. Criteria entry: 1. Distance between anal verge and centre of tumor 4-8?cm(median 6.2?cm), 2. Uncertainty in decision of preservation of anus before admission, 3. Lesion belonged to locally advanced type, 4. definitive pathology, clinical stage and presence of objective observation of tumor extent, 5. Performance status proposed by Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 0-2, 6. Age0.05), 25.5% and 48.5% (P