1.Complications of small bowel tumors
Longtang XU ; Zhangdong ZHENG ; Tianding ZENG
Chinese Journal of General Surgery 1993;0(01):-
Objective To study the complications of small bowel tumors (SBT) and their diagnosis and treatment. Methods A retrospective study was carried out among 47 SBT patients suffering from complications of SBT during the last two decades. Results Thirty-three cases (70%) were of malignant tumors. Complications included bleeding in 17 cases, perforation in 8, intussusception in 11, bowel obstruction in 8, volvulus, internal hernia and volvulus plus intussusception in one each. Abdominal pain was the most common presenting sign and symptom (40 cases). The mean interval from the onset of signs and symptoms to exploration was 4.7 months for those with malignant SBT and 3.1 months for benign ones. Roentgenography was the mainstay for diagnosis. Ultrasound, CT and MRI were also helpful. Benign tumors were treated with segmental resection of the affected bowel. Out of 33 malignant SBT patients, curative resection was performed in 26 and palliative resection in 7. Two patients died postoperatively.Conclusions Most patients with SBT were not correctly diagnosed until complications popped up. Surgery remains as the therapy of choice. [
2.Primary common bile duct closure after choledochotomy.
Longtang XU ; Zhangdong ZHENG ; Kai CHEN ; Rongjin WU ; Genjun MAO ; Jiansheng LUO ; Jiamin ZHANG ; Hao ZHANG ; Tianding ZENG
Chinese Journal of Surgery 2002;40(12):927-929
OBJECTIVETo investigate the rationality and feasibility of primary closure of the common bile duct after choledochotomy for common bile duct calculi.
METHODSFrom January 1990 to June 2001, 386 patients with the evidence of stones in the common bile duct underwent choledochotomy. Among them, 215 received primary closure of the common bile duct (group A) and 171 T-tube drainage (group B). The patients with emergency operations were excluded. Intraoperative choledochoscopy or cholangiography was routinely performed to rule out the possibility of retained stones. The duct was meticulously stitched using 0/3 to 0/5 absorbent sutures for primary closure. A T-tube was placed in the subhepatic space in the patients of both groups.
RESULTSPostoperative bile leakage was seen in 9 patients of group A and in 5 of group B, respectively (P > 0.05), and no reoperations were necessary. After surgery, the average time and volume of transfusion was 4.9 days and 9.1 liters in group A, versus 7.3 days and 12.8 liters in group B (P < 0.01). The patients in group B had a longer postoperative hospital stay than the those in group A (average 17.6:10.0 days, P < 0.01). T-tube removal resulted in bile peritonitis in 5 patients at day 16, 17, 19, 21 and 22 after surgery in group B, and 3 patients required repeated surgery.
CONCLUSIONSPrimary closure of the common bile duct after choledochotomy is safe, effective, and inexpensive in selected patients with common bile duct calculi, and should be regarded as an alternative procedure.
Adult ; Aged ; Biliary Tract Surgical Procedures ; methods ; Choledocholithiasis ; surgery ; Common Bile Duct ; surgery ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome
3.Risk factors analysis of neurogenic pain after adult high grade lumbar spondylolisthesis reduction surgery
Lang ZENG ; Yan YANG ; Liyuan JIANG ; Jianhuang WU ; Jianzhong HU ; Tianding WU
Chinese Journal of Orthopaedics 2024;44(13):866-873
Objective:To evaluate the significance of the lumbar bowstring ratio (LBR) and sagittal spine-pelvis parameters in predicting postoperative neurogenic pain in adult patients with high-grade lumbar isthmic spondylolisthesis following spinal fusion surgery.Methods:A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical and imaging data of 95 adult patients with high-grade lumbar isthmic spondylolisthesis treated by spinal surgery at Xiangya Hospital of Central South University from August 2012 to January 2023. Each patient was followed for a minimum of six months. Participants were categorized into pain and non-pain groups based on the presence of persistent radicular pain (≥8 weeks) and a visual analogue scale (VAS) score of ≥3 postoperatively. The pain group comprised 15 patients (5 males, 10 females; mean age 55.47±6.42 years, range 46-71 years), while the non-pain group included 80 patients (20 males, 60 females; mean age 60.98±11.50 years, range 40-85 years). Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and VAS scores. LBR was defined as the ratio of the vertical distance from the anterior convexity of the L 1-L 5 anterior longitudinal ligament to a line connecting the posterior superior margin of the L1 vertebra and the posterior margin of the S1 vertebra, to the distance between these two points. Spinal-pelvic parameters measured included pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), lumbar lordosis (LL), PT/SS ratio, and changes in LBR before and after surgery (ΔLBR). Statistical comparisons of demographic and imaging parameters were performed between the two groups, and variables showing significant differences were subjected to binary logistic regression analysis to identify independent risk factors for postoperative neurogenic pain. Results:All 95 patients achieved complete anatomical reduction of the dislocation without reported wound infections. Follow-up was completed at 7.68±2.98 months (range 6-12 months) postoperatively. Among the patients, 15 developed iatrogenic radicular pain. Postoperative complications included pulmonary infection (4 cases: 1 in the pain group, 3 in the non-pain group), cerebrospinal fluid leakage (8 cases: 2 in the pain group, 6 in the non-pain group), and delirium (5 cases: 2 in the pain group, 3 in the non-pain group). No significant differences were observed in demographic data between the groups ( P>0.05). Both groups demonstrated significant improvements in ODI (pain group Z=-3.413, P=0.001; non-pain group Z=-7.772, P<0.001) and VAS scores (pain group Z=-3.426, P=0.001; non-pain group Z=-7.838, P<0.001) at the 6-month follow-up compared to preoperative values. Significant differences were found between the pain and non-pain groups in PI ( t=3.315, P=0.004), PT ( t=5.087, P<0.001), SS ( t=7.431, P<0.001), LL ( t=3.764, P<0.001), PT/SS ( t=7.267, P<0.001), LBR ( t=6.455, P<0.001), and ΔLBR ( Z=5.362, P<0.001) before and after surgery. Binary logistic regression analysis identified smaller preoperative PT/SS [ OR=0.760, 95% CI(0.601, 0.961), P=0.022] and larger preoperative LBR [ OR=5.721, 95% CI (1.068, 30.634), P=0.042] as independent risk factors for postoperative neurogenic pain. Conclusion:High LBR and reduced PT/SS are significant risk factors for neurogenic pain following complete discectomy and fusion in adult patients with high-grade lumbar isthmic spondylolisthesis. For such patients, careful consideration is warranted regarding anatomical complete reduction during surgical intervention.