1.The Outcome Of Operative Treatment Modalities In Patients With Spinal Metastases
Savarirajo JC ; Faruk NA ; Tan BB ; Teo YY ; Zaki MA ; Wong CC
Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal 2018;12(Supplement A):155-
2.Shot In The Back, Bullet In My Spine
Fernandez J ; Tan BB ; Teo YY ; Aida F ; Wong CC
Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal 2018;12(Supplement A):181-
3.Treatment With Denosumab In A Recurrent Giant Cell Tumor Of Cervical Spine: A Case Report
Sia U ; Faruk NA ; Tan BB ; Teo YY ; Zaki MA ; Wong CC
Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal 2019;13(Supplement A):203-
4.Three Level Thoracolumbar Spondylectomy for Recurrent Giant Cell Tumour of the Spine: A Case Report
Faruk NA ; Mohd-Amin MZ ; Awang-Ojep DN ; Teo YY ; Wong CC
Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal 2018;12(3):50-52
Giant cell tumour (GCT) is a benign tumour but can be locally aggressive and with the potential to metastasise especially to the lungs. Successful treatments have been reported for long bone lesions; however, optimal surgical and medical treatment for spinal and sacral lesions are not well established. In treating spinal GCTs, the aim is to achieve complete tumour excision, restore spinal stability and decompress the neural tissues. The ideal surgical procedure is an en bloc spondylectomy or vertebrectomy, where all tumour cells are removed as recurrence is closely related to the extent of initial surgical excision. However, such a surgery has a high complication rate, such as dura tear and massive blood loss. We report a patient with a missed pathological fracture of T12 treated initially with a posterior subtraction osteotomy, who had recurrence three years after the index surgery and subsequently underwent a three level vertebrectomy and posterior spinal fusion.
5.Post-implantation Deformation of Titanium Rod and Cobalt Chrome Rod in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
Sia U ; Tan BB ; Teo YY ; Wong CC
Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal 2019;13(1):14-19
Introduction: Post-implantation rod deformation is anticipated in scoliosis surgery but the difference in rod deformation between titanium and cobalt chrome rod has not been elucidated. This study aims to compare the difference in rod deformation between two groups. Materials and Methods: Twenty-one adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients were recruited from a single center. The over-contoured concave rods were traced prior to insertion. Post-operative sagittal rod shape was determined from lateral radiographs. Rod deformation was determined using maximal rod deflection and angle of the tangents to rod end points. The differences between pre- and post-operative rod contour were analysed statistically. Rod deformation and thoracic kyphosis between two types of implants were analysed. Results:Both rods exhibited significant change of rod angle and deflection post-operatively. Curvature of the titanium rod and cobalt chrome rod decreased from 60.5° to 37°, and 51° to 28° respectively. Deflection of titanium rod and cobalt chrome rod reduced from 28mm to 23.5mm and 30mm to 17mm respectively. There was no significant difference between titanium and cobalt chrome groups with regard to rod angle (p=0.173) and deflection (p=0.654). Thoracic kyphosis was increased from 20° to 26° in titanium group but a reduction from 25° to 23° was noticed in cobalt chrome group, but these findings were not statistically significant. Conclusion: There was no statistical difference in rod deformation between the two groups. Thus, the use of titanium rod in correction of sagittal profile is not inferior in outcome compared with cobalt chrome but with lower cost.
6.Strategies in Managing Bamboo Spine Fractures
Danapala H ; Foo CH ; Chan SK ; Lim HS ; Tan BB ; Teo YY ; Wong CC
Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal 2018;12(Supplement A):192-
7.TB Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome (TB-IRIS) In The Treatment Of TB Spine
Peris MM ; Foo CH ; Chan SK ; Lim HS ; Tan BB ; Teo YY ; Wong CC
Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal 2018;12(Supplement A):25-
8.Bubble Trouble, A Case Report
Liew TWS ; Foo CH ; Chan SK ; Lim HS ; Nor MN ; Tan BB ; Teo YY ; Wong CC
Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal 2018;12(Supplement A):194-