No abstract available.
Telemedicine*

No abstract available.
Telemedicine

No abstract available.
Telemedicine*

No abstract available.
Telemedicine*

No abstract available.
Telemedicine

No abstract available.
Telemedicine*

No abstract available.
Telemedicine

No abstract available.
Telemedicine

Objective: To assess the quality of care of telemedicine consultation during the COVID-19 pandemic at the Jose R. Reyes Memorial Medical Center in 2022. : Methods Design: Cross-Sectional Study Setting: Tertiary Government Training Hospital Participants: 210 patients Results: Majority of the respondents were female, less than 40 years of age, unemployed, consulted for the first time, lived < 25km distance from the hospital, consulted because of an ear problem, consulted without symptoms suggestive of COVID-19 and had higher outcomes of face-to-face consultation. The overall satisfaction with teleconsultation was good with majority of patients satisfied and very satisfied with teleconsultation (4.29±1.083). Occupational status, technical problems encountered in the teleconsultation, and those who were bothered by the absence of clinical examination were associated with the perceived quality of care of the ENT teleconsultation (p < .05). Among the population who were satisfied to ENT teleconsultation, 82 (43%) were from the working population (OR 2.2 [1.1-4.7]), 158 (95%) were satisfied with quality of response (OR 23.7 [9.4-59.8]) and 154 (93%) were satisfied with image quality (OR 16.9 [7.3-39.0]). Conclusion Teleconsultation for ENT has proven useful in terms of satisfying the urgent concerns of patients in a pandemic setting.
Telemedicine

Introduction: Telemedicine services have steadily been relied upon since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Understanding its usability and contextual performance is of paramount importance if it were to pervade the local health delivery system. Hence, a tool to assess usability is warranted. Objective: The study aims to adapt a reliable and validated instrument in English to Filipino, the Telehealth Usability Questionnaire (TUQ), on evaluating the usability of telemedicine services in the Philippines. Methodology: The research is a translation and validation study. The methodology includes forward translation in collaboration with our UST Sentro sa Salin at Araling Salin and expert panel review with five experts using the telehealth system. It was followed by pretesting (pilot testing and cognitive debriefing) of the pre-final tool to 30 family medicine telehealth patients and field testing of the final instrument to 85 telehealth patients from USTH. Appropriate statistical methods for assessment included internal consistency, content validity and linguistic with conceptual equivalence. Results: All translated items were retained, but through the focus group discussion, several statements were modified to fit the cultural context. Each item and the overall tool showed excellent validity and internal consistency. The mean difference scores for each item and domain were less than ±0.25. Tests of equivalence showed that majority of items and each domain were not statistically different (p>0.05), suggesting that both questionnaires are similar and homogenous. Furthermore, the Bland-Altman plots for each dimension/domain are within the upper and lower boundaries indicating agreement between the two versions. Conclusion TUQ-Filipino is a valid and appropriate instrument to assess telehealth usability in the local setting.
Telemedicine