Objective To investigate the off-label use status in obstetrics ward so as to provide references for carrying out obstetrics pharmaceutical care and promoting safe medication use in pregnant and parturient women. Methods The prescriptions for pregnant and parturient women from January to June, 2015 in obstetrics ward were investigated. According to drug instructions, the off-label drug use of prescriptions of all selected patients was analyzed in the following aspects:the category of off-label drug use, and drugs use information. In addition, a logistic regression was conducted that modeled the odds of receiving an off-label prescription as a function of the following possible risk factors:pregnant, parturient women and the rank of doctors. The clinical results including the unreasonable drug application, abortion rate and birth defect were compared between the off-label drug use and on-label drug use groups. Results Total of 384 patients were selected, and 5330 prescriptions involving 50 drugs were analyzed. The rate of off-label drug use was 68. 5%, 27. 7% and 24. 0% in patients, prescriptions and drug categories, respectively. The main categories of off-label drug use were super solvent use ( 76. 6%) and indication (14. 3%). The top 3 drugs of off-label use were those for urinary and reproductive (56. 2%), alimentary tract (46. 9%) and traditional Chinese medicine (43. 4%). In addition, there was no significant correlation between the risk of off-label drug use and maternal status and the level of doctors. And no significant difference between the two groups in the unreasonable drug application, abortion rate and birth defect was detected. Conclusion The off-label drug use in obstetrics ward is common in this hospital and most of them are supported by clinical evidence. Due to the lack of more authoritative evidence-based medication, the doctors are suggested to use the drug according to provisions of the drug instructions. When off-label drug use is really needed, it should be based on the surpport of evidence basde medicine,so as to ensure the drug safety for pregnant and parturient women and avoid professional risks.

Objective To explore the risk factors of recurrence of chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) after drilling and drainage,and to explore the cumulative risk of various risk factors in recurrence.Methods A retrospective analysis of 257 patients with CSDH,admitted to and accepted complete drainage in our hospital from January 2010 to December 2015,was performed;234 patients were without recurrence and 23 patients with recurrence.The risk factors of relapse,including age,hypertension,diabetes,hematoma characteristics,preoperative hematoma thickness,preoperative median deviation,hematoma thickness at discharge,midline deviation at discharge and hematoma density,were analyzed.Logistic regression analysis was performed to conform the independent risk factors and cumulative risk of multiple possible risk factors.Results Univariate analysis showed that age,hypertension,diabetes mellitus,preoperative hematoma thickness,preoperative median deviation,hematoma thickness at discharge,midline deviation at discharge and hematoma density were significantly different between the patients without recurrence and patients with recurrence (P＜0.05).Age,diabetes mellitus,preoperative hematoma thickness,and midline shift at discharge were independent risk factors for postoperative drilling recurrence.The cumulative effect of risk factors was that patients with two independent risk factors had a relapse risk of one 4.22-9.50-fold in patients with or without recurrence-independent risk factors,with a risk of recurrence of up to 38.0-fold in patients with three or four independent risk factors.Conclusions The risk factors of recurrence of chronic subdural hematoma after bile duct drainage are age,diabetes mellitus,preoperative hematoma thickness ≥20 mm and midline deviation ≥ 5 mm at discharge.When more independent risk factors are combined,fold increase of cumulative risk of recurrence is noted.

Objective:To analyze the hemostatic drugs use for orchidopexy in children during the perioperative period to promote the rational use of hemostatic drugs for orchidopexy in children. Methods:The perioperative prophylactic use of hemostatic drugs for orchi-dopexy in 138 children from June 2015 to December 2016 was retrospectively analyzed. The difference of clinical data and outcome indica-tors were compared between hemostatic drugs group(drug group) and without hemostatic drugs group (control group),and the rational use of hemostatic drugs in the drug group was analyzed. Results:The operation time,amount of bleeding and the length of hospital stay showed no statistical differences between the groups during the perioperative period in our hospital. There were 44.9% of children under-going orchidopexy treated with hemostatic drugs,and the unreasonable rate was 51.6% in the drug group. Among them,35.5% of chil-dren were with too long medication time,11.3% of children were with unreasonable initial treatment time, and 4.8% of children were with single overdose. Conclusion:The perioperative hemostatic drugs use for orchidopexy in children still has several problems, inclu-ding excessive medication duration,inappropriate administration time and single overdose etc,and clinicians should pay attention to above situations.