To clarify what are contributing factors associated with the place to die (home or hospital) in a rural area, we investigated several background factors of 107 patients who died at home or in hospital after receiving home care service during the period of four years from July 1995 to June 2000. The subjects were divided into two group those who died at home (39 cases, 36%) and those who died in our hospital (68 cases, 64%). The ratio of deaths at home increased every year, and reached a half of those who died after receiving home care service. The average age in those who died at home were 87.1±9.5 years, that was higher than that of those who died in our hospital (82.2±9.8 years). There was no difference betwe two groups about sex, basic diseases and the time required to get to the hospital by car. Death at home was more preferred by patients, whereas death in the hospital was preferred by patients' families. The level of activities of daily living (ADL) in those who died at home was lower compared with that in those who died in the hospital. Those who died at home significantly had lesser complaints (pain, dyspnea and so on) and had more care-givers in the family, than those who died in the hospital. These results revealed that the major factors in death at home are: 1) low level of ADL, 2) preference to death at home expressed by patients, 3) presence of additional care-givers, and 4) no complaint of symptoms from patients.

We investigated the effects on medical education of early exposure of undergraduate students to a summer camp for children with asthma. An objective evaluation by the editorial staff found final improvements in the following areas (in descending order of frequency): learning of basic medical behavior (91% of students); cooperative attitude of medical staff in general treatment with the patient and the patient's family (88%); understanding of childhood growth and development (80%); knowledge of childhood asthma (69%); and mastery of basic techniques for therapy and examination (41%). The differences in the ratio of improvement (%) before and after visiting the camp, were (in descending order of frequency): cooperative attitude of medical care staff in general medical treatment with the patient and the patient's family (47%); understanding of childhood growth and development (45%); knowledge of childhood asthma (38%); learning of basic medical manner (34%); and mastery of basic techniques for therapy and examination (25%). These findings suggest that a summer camp is useful for exposing undergraduate medical students to children with asthma and is effective for helping them understand patients and family-oriented pediatric medicine.