1.Factors Affecting Survival after Surgical Treatment for Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm.
Hiroshi Ohuchi ; Keisuke Ueda ; Yuji Yokote ; Takuji Watanabe ; Haruhiko Asano ; Toshiya Koyanagi ; Shunei Kyo ; Ryozo Omoto
Japanese Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery 1999;28(1):25-29
To identify the factors affecting the high mortality rates associated with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA), a review was made of the records of 35 consecutive patients (33 males, 2 females, mean age 69.9yr.) treated surgically between 1988 and 1997. Preoperatively profound shock (systolic pressure less than 70mmHg) was seen in 19 patients and loss of consciousness in 9. Maximum diameter of the AAA was 79±20mm and the preoperative hemoglobin level was 9.1±2.4g/dl. Proximal aortic clamp was performed at the intrathoracic aorta in 3 cases, the suprarenal aorta in 6, balloon occlusion in 4, and the infrarenal aorta in 22. Since 1994, diltiazem and nitroglycerin have been routinely given for latent myocardial ischemia and early induction of continuous hemodialysis for renal failure was attempted postoperatively. The overall hospital mortality rate was 20%. Multisystem failure was the most frequent cause of hospital death (57.1%), followed by pneumonia with sepsis in 28.6%, and intraoperative cardiac arrest (14.3%). By univariate analysis of various factors associated with the mortality rate, loss of consciousness, abnormality on electrocarciogram (ECG) and duration of shock for more than five hours were statistically significant. Multivariate analysis with stepwise logistic regression demonstrated that an ECG abnormality and duration of shock more than five hours were associated with high mortality, but not at statistically significant levels. These findings suggest that factors that are predictive of death (loss of consciousness and ECG abnormality) may be a reflection of shock in this patient population.
2.Comparison of 19-gauge conventional and Franseen needles for the diagnosis of lymphadenopathy and classification of malignant lymphoma using endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration
Mitsuru OKUNO ; Keisuke IWATA ; Tsuyoshi MUKAI ; Yusuke KITO ; Takuji TANAKA ; Naoki WATANABE ; Senji KASAHARA ; Yuhei IWASA ; Akihiko SUGIYAMA ; Youichi NISHIGAKI ; Yuhei SHIBATA ; Junichi KITAGAWA ; Takuji IWASHITA ; Eiichi TOMITA ; Masahito SHIMIZU
Clinical Endoscopy 2024;57(3):364-374
Background/Aims:
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) using a 19-gauge needle is an efficient sampling method for the diagnosis of lymphadenopathy. This study compared 19-gauge conventional and Franseen needles for the diagnosis of lymphadenopathy and classification of malignant lymphoma (ML).
Methods:
Patient characteristics, number of needle passes, puncture route, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of cytology/histology for lymphadenopathy were analyzed in patients diagnosed with lymphadenopathy by EUS-FNA using conventional or Franseen needles.
Results:
Between 2012 and 2022, 146 patients met the inclusion criteria (conventional [n=70] and Franseen [n=76]). The median number of needle passes was significantly lower in the conventional group than in the Franseen group (3 [1–6] vs. 4 [1–6], p=0.023). There were no significant differences in cytological/histological diagnoses between the two groups. For ML, the immunohistochemical evaluation rate, sensitivity of flow cytometry, and cytogenetic assessment were not significantly different in either group. Bleeding as adverse events (AEs) were observed in three patients in the Franseen group.
Conclusions
Both the 19-gauge conventional and Franseen needles showed high accuracy in lymphadenopathy and ML classification. Considering sufficient tissue collection and the avoidance of AEs, the use of 19-gauge conventional needles seems to be a good option for the diagnosis of lymphadenopathy.
3.Utility and Usefulness of the Skills Laboratory to Improve Practical Training in Clinical Skills
Takato UENO ; Ichiro YOSHIDA ; Akihiro HAYASHI ; Yoshinori TAKAJYO ; Masayuki WATANABE ; Taketo KUROKI ; Kouichi YOSHIMURA ; Kimio USHIJIMA ; Yoshiko SUEYASU ; Kazuhiko MATSUO ; Takuji TORIMURA ; Hitoshi ABE ; Hiroshi MIYAZAKI ; Syusuke KONO ; Teiji AKAGI ; Yutaka NAKASHIMA ; Michio SATA
Medical Education 2003;34(2):81-87
Medical students at Kurume University begin practical training in clinical skills in their fourth year. At that time, students use the skills laboratory to improve their clinical skills. Medical education resources in the skills laboratory include simulators for emergency resuscitation and heart diseases, wireless stethoscopes, and videotapes. All students use the skills laboratory for 2 months, and its usefulness was evaluated with questionnaires after practical training. More than 50 % of students approved of their practice in the skills laboratory. However, some students were unsatisfied because they were unable to make effective use of the simulators. In the future, an improved skills laboratory will be necessary to improve practical training in the clinical skills for medical students.
4.Analyses of Scores of Examinations for Practical Training in Clinical Skills and for Clinical Training and Scores of Graduation Examinations in Undergraduate Medical Students
Takato UENO ; Ichiro YOSHIDA ; Hiroki INUTSUKA ; Mariko HOTTA ; Takuji TORIMURA ; Hitoshi ABE ; Syuhei KOUNO ; Akihiro HAYASHI ; Masayuki WATANABE ; Teiji AKAGI ; Kazuhiko MATUO ; Yoshio OGO ; Yoshinori TAKAJYO ; Hiroshi MIYAZAKI ; Michio SATA
Medical Education 2004;35(5):303-308
We analyzed the scores of objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs) and written examinations administered to fourth-year medical students after practical training in clinical skills and to fifth-year medical students after clinical training and scores of graduation examinations taken by sixth-year medical students. Correlations were analyzed among the scores of 96 students who had taken all 3 examinations during a 3-year period. Mean scores on examinations in the fourth, fifth, and sixth years were compared between sixth-year students who did or did not graduate and between graduating students who did or did not pass the national examination for medical practitioners in Japan. Significant correlations in the scores were found between 1) OSCEs and written examinations for fourth-year students versus those for the fifth-year students; 2) OSCE and written examinations for fourth-year students versus graduation examination scores for the sixth-year students; and 3) OSCE and written examinations for fifth-year students versus graduation examination scores for sixth-year students. In addition, the mean scores in the fourth and fifth years were significantly higher for sixth-year students who graduated and passed the national examination than for students who did not graduate or who graduated but failed the national examination. These results suggest that the practical training in clinical skills given to fourth-year students and the clinical training given to fifth-year students strongly affect the overall evaluation of the ability of sixth-year students and success on the national examination.