1.Denosumab for Treatment of a Recurrent Cervical Giant-Cell Tumor.
Daisuke KAJIWARA ; Hiroto KAMODA ; Tsukasa YONEMOTO ; Shintaro IWATA ; Takeshi ISHII ; Toshinori TSUKANISHI ; Seiji OHTORI ; Masashi YAMAZAKI ; Akihiko OKAWA
Asian Spine Journal 2016;10(3):553-557
A 43-year-old male patient with C5 giant cell tumor (GCT) underwent tumor resection and anterior bone fusion of C4-C6. The tumor recurred locally 9 months after surgery with the patient complaining of neck and shoulder pain similar to his preoperative symptoms. Denosumab was administered and his pain disappeared after a two-month administration, with a sclerotic rim formation seen at the tumor site on computed tomography. He has been followed for 18 months with no evidence of tumor recurrence. Complete resection is generally recommended, but is not easy for many patients with cervical GCT because of the existence of neurovascular structures. Some patients suffer from recurrence and treatment becomes more difficult. As such, denosumab may be an efficacious option for treatment of recurrent GCT of the cervical spine, although long-term follow-up is required to monitor for presence or absence of recurrence.
Adult
;
Cervical Vertebrae
;
Denosumab*
;
Female
;
Follow-Up Studies
;
Giant Cell Tumor of Bone
;
Giant Cell Tumors
;
Humans
;
Male
;
Neck
;
Recurrence
;
Shoulder Pain
;
Spine
2.Retrospective Study of Surgical Gastrojejunostomy versus Gastroduodenal Stenting for Malignant Gastroduodenal Obstruction
Toshihiko Matsumoto ; Kaori Hino ; Hiroyuki Terasawa ; Akio Nakasya ; Kazuhiro Uesugi ; Norifumi Nishide ; Takeshi Kajiwara ; Akinori Asagi ; Tomohiro Nishina ; Junichirou Nasu ; Shinichiro Hori ; Seijin Nadano ; Hiroshi Ishii
Palliative Care Research 2016;11(2):166-173
Background: We retrospectively compared endscopic gastroduodenal stenting with gastrojejunostomy as a means of palliating malignant gastric and duodenal obstruction. Methods: This retrospective study investigated patients treated for malignant gastric and duodenal obstruction from April 2011 to April 2015 at Shikoku Cancer Center. Results: Of the 40 patients in this study, 25 underwent gastroduodenal stenting and 15 had operative gastrojejunostomy. Comparing the stenting and operative patients, technical success rate was 100% in both group, clinical success rate was 84% in stenting patients and 93% in operative patients. The median time to fluid intake was significantly shorter in stenting patients than operative patients(0 day vs 2 days, p=0.0003), and the median time to intake of solids was also significantly shorter in stenting patients(1day vs 3 days, p<0.0001).The median hospital stay was significantly shorter in stenting patients(9 days vs 23 days, p=0.0116). Median cost of hospitalization is more expensive in operative patients than stenting patients(¥1,106,170 vs ¥752,290, p=0.0052). Conclusion: Our study suggested that gastoroduodenal stent was less length of time to fluid/solid intake, and less costly than gastrojejunostomy.