1.A Case of Vein Graft Bypass for Superior Mesenteric Artery Stenosis.
Naoki Kanemitsu ; Manabu Okabe ; Seiichiro Wariishi ; Takasumi Nakamura
Japanese Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery 2000;29(1):60-62
We report a case of successful saphenous vein bypass grafting for superior mesenteric artery stenosis. A 50-year-old man complained of abdominal pain which was not induced by either eating or defecation. He was admitted to our hospital and examinations of the gastrointestinal tract revealed no abnormality. Angiography showed stenosis of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA), but not of the celiac artery (CA) or inferior mesenteric artery (IMA). We speculated that his symptom was due to SMA stenosis and poor collateral circulations from the CA, IMA and internal iliac arteries. Saphenous vein bypass grafting for SMA was undertaken successfully and abdominal pain disappeared completely.
2.Surgery for Aortic Valvular Disease with Congenital Bicuspid Aortic Valve.
Seiichiro Wariishi ; Naoki Kanemitsu ; Hironori Tenpaku ; Manabu Okabe ; Takasumi Nakamura
Japanese Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery 2001;30(2):59-62
An increase of aortic valvular disease associated with congenital bicuspid aortic valve is observed due to the relative decrease of rheumatic valvular diseases. A total of 24 patients with aortic valvular disease associated with congenital bicuspid aortic valve underwent surgical treatment at our institution during the period from January, 1997 to December, 1999. These 24 patients constituted 46.2% (24/52) of all cases of surgical operations for aortic valvular disease. The age of the patients ranged from 17 to 83 years (mean 62 years). They consisted of 16 men (66.7%) and 8 women. Two patients had infective endocarditis. The classification of congenital bicuspid aortic valve was right-left cusp type in 15 patients (raphe+: 11), anterior-posterior cusp type in 9 patients (raphe+: 9). We performed aortic valve replacement in 22 patients, aortic root replacement in 1 patient and aortic root remodeling in 1 patient in combination with mitral valve plasty in 3 patients, coronary artery bypass grafting in 3 patients and closure of the atrial septal defect (ASD) in 1 patient. We detected ASD in 1 patient, ventricular septal defect in 1 patient and high-posterior take-off right coronary artery in 1 patient. Patients with stenosis often have a small aortic annulus and severe post-stenotic aortic dilation. Preoperative and intraoperative evaluation is important in cases of aortic valvular disease associated with congenital bicuspid aortic valve.
3.A multicenter comparative study of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy using a Franseen needle versus conventional endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration to evaluate microsatellite instability in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer
Tadayuki TAKAGI ; Mitsuru SUGIMOTO ; Hidemichi IMAMURA ; Yosuke TAKAHATA ; Yuki NAKAJIMA ; Rei SUZUKI ; Naoki KONNO ; Hiroyuki ASAMA ; Yuki SATO ; Hiroki IRIE ; Jun NAKAMURA ; Mika TAKASUMI ; Minami HASHIMOTO ; Tsunetaka KATO ; Ryoichiro KOBASHI ; Yuko HASHIMOTO ; Goro SHIBUKAWA ; Shigeru MARUBASHI ; Takuto HIKICHI ; Hiromasa OHIRA
Clinical Endoscopy 2023;56(1):107-113
Background/Aims:
Immune checkpoint blockade has recently been reported to be effective in treating microsatellite instability (MSI)-high tumors. Therefore, sufficient sampling of histological specimens is necessary in cases of unresectable pancreatic cancer (UR-PC). This multicenter study investigated the efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) using a Franseen needle for MSI evaluation in patients with UR-PC.
Methods:
A total of 89 patients with UR-PC who underwent endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) or EUS-FNB using 22-G needles at three hospitals in Japan (2018–2021) were enrolled. Fifty-six of these patients (FNB 23 and FNA 33) were followed up or evaluated for MSI. Patient characteristics, UR-PC data, and procedural outcomes were compared between patients who underwent EUS-FNB and those who underwent EUS-FNA.
Results:
No significant difference in terms of sufficient tissue acquisition for histology was observed between patients who underwent EUS-FNB and those who underwent EUS-FNA. MSI evaluation was possible significantly more with tissue samples obtained using EUS-FNB than with tissue samples obtained using EUS-FNA (82.6% [19/23] vs. 45.5% [15/33], respectively; p<0.01). In the multivariate analysis, EUS-FNB was the only significant factor influencing the possibility of MSI evaluation.
Conclusions
EUS-FNB using a Franseen needle is desirable for ensuring sufficient tissue acquisition for MSI evaluation.