Background : Constraint-induced movement therapy (CI therapy) is a rehabilitation treatment that effectively improves upper extremity function in patients with chronic hemiparesis after stroke. In Japan, no previous studies have shown the effects of CI therapy in a large size sample, and the Simple Test for Evaluating Hand Function (STEF), a standard assessment tool for upper extremity function, is rarely used to evaluate the effects of CI therapy. Little is known regarding the factors capable of predicting the outcome of CI therapy. The present study aimed to examine potential predictors of outcomes after CI therapy and the effects of CI therapy using STEF. Methods : This study included patients with hemiparesis in the chronic stage of stroke (≥180 days from onset). We compared upper extremity function before and after CI therapy intervention, which involved 5 hours per day for 10 consecutive weekdays of training. We assessed upper extremity function using the STEF, Wolf Motor Function Test-functional ability scale (WMFT-FAS) before and after intervention, and investigated potential predictors (age, gender, time since stroke, type of stroke, side of stroke, hand dominance, spasticity). Results : There were 107 subjects. Our comparison revealed that both STEF and WMFT-FAS scores improved significantly following intervention, from means of 31.3 to 42.7 points and 51.8 to 57.0 points, respectively. No significant predictors that influenced the functional outcome were identified. Conclusion : CI therapy is effective for improving upper extremity function. It is important not to exclude people from CI therapy based on any supposed predictors.

OBJECTIVETo clarify the methodological issues for the High-risk and population Strategy for Occupational Health Promotion Study (HIPOP-OHP study), which is a 4-year non-randomized control trial, an interim assessment of male participants was performed 3 years after the baseline survey.

METHODSWe had approximately 2,500 and 4,000 participants in the intervention and control groups, respectively. The population measures and prevalence of risk factors at each year, and between the baseline and 4th examinations were compared between the two groups. The personal trends of returning participants who were in the study at the 1(st) and 4(th) examinations were also evaluated.

RESULTSDuring the 3 years, an increase in serum HDL cholesterol (2.7 mg/dl), and a reduction in the prevalence of hypertriglycemia detected with fasting blood samples (3.6%) and current smokers (5.4%) were observed in the intervention group. The mean HDL cholesterol level was significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group at the 4th examination, reversed from the baseline survey. The serum non-HDL cholesterol level was significantly increased only in the control group. There was also a significant increase in the prevalence of hypertriglycemia nad high plasma glucose detected with fasting blood samples in the control group. The return participation rate after 3 years was 72.2% for the intervention group and 74.9% for the control group. The above-mentioned changes for risk factors were mainly due to returning participants at each examination.

CONCLUSIONThese interventional methods may be effective in improving overall cardiovascular risk factors in the population. However, the low return participation rate will dilute the effect of the intervention.

OBJECTIVETo examine the effectiveness of newly developed materials for providing health-related information to the worksite population, we compared the amount of attention that employees paid to the materials.

METHODSStudy subjects were 2,361 employees in six companies participating in an intervention program between 2002 and 2003. Three kinds of media were used as tools for providing health information: [1] Point Of Purchase advertising menus (POP menus) were placed on all tables in company restaurants, [2] posters were put on walls and [3] leaflets were distributed at health-related events. One year or more after the introduction of these media, we compared the amount of attention paid to each type of medium.

RESULTSAmongst the three types of media, the POP menu drew the most attention, although results were not consistent in all gender and company groups. Every piece of information provided by the POP menus was "always" or "almost always" read by 41% of the men and 51% of the women surveyed. The corresponding rate for posters was 30% in men and 32% in women. For leaflets, only 16% of men and 22% of women read almost all of the leaflets. More attention was paid to the POP menu when the sample was women, older, and ate at the company restaurant at least three times a week.

CONCLUSIONThe POP menu may provide health-related information to a broader range of people than posters and leaflets, therefore, it is an effective material for population strategy.