1.Gelastic seizures in a child with frontal lobe epilepsy controlled by topiramate monotherapy
Hideo Enoki ; Takuya Yokota ; Mitsuyo Nishimura ; Yuki Sasaki ; Ayataka Fujimoto ; Takamichi Yamamoto
Neurology Asia 2014;19(1):89-92
We report a childhood case of localization-related epilepsy manifesting frequent gelastic seizures,
which were successfully treated with topiramate (TPM) monotherapy. The seizures were not associated
with feelings of mirth. High-resolution three-tesla magnetic resonance imaging revealed no structural
abnormality. Interictal 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography showed hypometabolism
over the entire right hemisphere. Single-photon emission computed tomography imaging, both ictal
and interictal, demonstrated no significant findings. Interictal electroencephalography (EEG) showed
paroxysms in the right frontal region. Ictal video EEG demonstrated diffuse attenuation, followed by
fast activities and spike-wave complexes predominantly over the right hemisphere. At the ictal EEG
onset, low amplitude paroxysmal fast activity was recorded over the F8-T4 region. The seizures were
considered to have originated from the right frontal lobe. TPM monotherapy resulted in complete
cessation of the seizure. We suggest that TPM should be considered as a valuable tool for treating
childhood intractable gelastic seizures, which are not due to hypothalamic hamartoma.
2.Safety and efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic duct drainage using a drill dilator: a retrospective study in Japan
Ahmed SADEK ; Kazuo HARA ; Nozomi OKUNO ; Shin HABA ; Takamichi KUWAHARA ; Toshitaka FUKUI ; Minako URATA ; Takashi KONDO ; Yoshitaro YAMAMOTO ; Kenneth TACHI
Clinical Endoscopy 2024;57(5):666-674
Background/Aims:
Dilation of the tract before stent deployment is a challenging step in endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic duct drainage (EUS-PDD). In this study, we examined the effectiveness and safety of a novel spiral dilator, Tornus ES (Asahi Intec), for EUS-PDD.
Methods:
This was a retrospective, single-arm, observational study at Aichi Cancer Center Hospital. The punctured tract was dilated using a Tornus ES dilator in all EUS-PDD cases. Our primary endpoint was the technical success rate of initial tract dilation. Technical success was defined as successful fistula dilation using a Tornus ES followed by successful stent insertion. Secondary endpoints were procedure times and early adverse events.
Results:
A total of 12 patients were included between December 2021 and March 2023. EUS-PDD was performed in 11 patients for post-pancreaticoduodenectomy anastomotic strictures and one patient with pancreatitis with duodenal perforation. The technical success rates of stent insertion and fistula dilation using a Tornus ES dilator was 100%. The median procedure time was 24 minutes. No remarkable adverse events related to the procedure were observed, apart from fever, which occurred in 2 patients.
Conclusions
Tract dilation in EUS-PDD using a Tornus ES is effective and safe.
3.Safety and efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic duct drainage using a drill dilator: a retrospective study in Japan
Ahmed SADEK ; Kazuo HARA ; Nozomi OKUNO ; Shin HABA ; Takamichi KUWAHARA ; Toshitaka FUKUI ; Minako URATA ; Takashi KONDO ; Yoshitaro YAMAMOTO ; Kenneth TACHI
Clinical Endoscopy 2024;57(5):666-674
Background/Aims:
Dilation of the tract before stent deployment is a challenging step in endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic duct drainage (EUS-PDD). In this study, we examined the effectiveness and safety of a novel spiral dilator, Tornus ES (Asahi Intec), for EUS-PDD.
Methods:
This was a retrospective, single-arm, observational study at Aichi Cancer Center Hospital. The punctured tract was dilated using a Tornus ES dilator in all EUS-PDD cases. Our primary endpoint was the technical success rate of initial tract dilation. Technical success was defined as successful fistula dilation using a Tornus ES followed by successful stent insertion. Secondary endpoints were procedure times and early adverse events.
Results:
A total of 12 patients were included between December 2021 and March 2023. EUS-PDD was performed in 11 patients for post-pancreaticoduodenectomy anastomotic strictures and one patient with pancreatitis with duodenal perforation. The technical success rates of stent insertion and fistula dilation using a Tornus ES dilator was 100%. The median procedure time was 24 minutes. No remarkable adverse events related to the procedure were observed, apart from fever, which occurred in 2 patients.
Conclusions
Tract dilation in EUS-PDD using a Tornus ES is effective and safe.
4.Safety and efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic duct drainage using a drill dilator: a retrospective study in Japan
Ahmed SADEK ; Kazuo HARA ; Nozomi OKUNO ; Shin HABA ; Takamichi KUWAHARA ; Toshitaka FUKUI ; Minako URATA ; Takashi KONDO ; Yoshitaro YAMAMOTO ; Kenneth TACHI
Clinical Endoscopy 2024;57(5):666-674
Background/Aims:
Dilation of the tract before stent deployment is a challenging step in endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic duct drainage (EUS-PDD). In this study, we examined the effectiveness and safety of a novel spiral dilator, Tornus ES (Asahi Intec), for EUS-PDD.
Methods:
This was a retrospective, single-arm, observational study at Aichi Cancer Center Hospital. The punctured tract was dilated using a Tornus ES dilator in all EUS-PDD cases. Our primary endpoint was the technical success rate of initial tract dilation. Technical success was defined as successful fistula dilation using a Tornus ES followed by successful stent insertion. Secondary endpoints were procedure times and early adverse events.
Results:
A total of 12 patients were included between December 2021 and March 2023. EUS-PDD was performed in 11 patients for post-pancreaticoduodenectomy anastomotic strictures and one patient with pancreatitis with duodenal perforation. The technical success rates of stent insertion and fistula dilation using a Tornus ES dilator was 100%. The median procedure time was 24 minutes. No remarkable adverse events related to the procedure were observed, apart from fever, which occurred in 2 patients.
Conclusions
Tract dilation in EUS-PDD using a Tornus ES is effective and safe.
5.Safety and efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic duct drainage using a drill dilator: a retrospective study in Japan
Ahmed SADEK ; Kazuo HARA ; Nozomi OKUNO ; Shin HABA ; Takamichi KUWAHARA ; Toshitaka FUKUI ; Minako URATA ; Takashi KONDO ; Yoshitaro YAMAMOTO ; Kenneth TACHI
Clinical Endoscopy 2024;57(5):666-674
Background/Aims:
Dilation of the tract before stent deployment is a challenging step in endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic duct drainage (EUS-PDD). In this study, we examined the effectiveness and safety of a novel spiral dilator, Tornus ES (Asahi Intec), for EUS-PDD.
Methods:
This was a retrospective, single-arm, observational study at Aichi Cancer Center Hospital. The punctured tract was dilated using a Tornus ES dilator in all EUS-PDD cases. Our primary endpoint was the technical success rate of initial tract dilation. Technical success was defined as successful fistula dilation using a Tornus ES followed by successful stent insertion. Secondary endpoints were procedure times and early adverse events.
Results:
A total of 12 patients were included between December 2021 and March 2023. EUS-PDD was performed in 11 patients for post-pancreaticoduodenectomy anastomotic strictures and one patient with pancreatitis with duodenal perforation. The technical success rates of stent insertion and fistula dilation using a Tornus ES dilator was 100%. The median procedure time was 24 minutes. No remarkable adverse events related to the procedure were observed, apart from fever, which occurred in 2 patients.
Conclusions
Tract dilation in EUS-PDD using a Tornus ES is effective and safe.