4.Are the Multiple Choice Questions Actually Objective?
Taiichi SAITO ; Seizaburo ARITA ; Ikuo NASU
Medical Education 1982;13(4):251-255
6.Effects of the types of MCQ tests on the examinee's score
Ikuo NASU ; Seizaburo ARITA ; Taiichi SAITO
Medical Education 1983;14(6):410-418
8.Indices using for evaluation of MCQ tests and their issues. With a proposal of a standard-setting method for the present national board examinations.
Ikuo Nasu ; Seizaburo Arita ; Taiichi Saito
Medical Education 1990;21(2):95-99
To evaluate the achievement of medical or dental education the criterion-referenced tests must be used. In this paper we proposed a new setting method of the difficulty level of the multiple-choice questions (MCQs) used in the National Board Examinations for Medical or Dental Practice. The difficulty levels should be determined by using the idea of the “Correct Terminal” which is consisting of the minimal sets of items to answer correctly. The difficulty level, the percentage of correct answer and the phi-coefficient of a question vary depending on the arrangement of the items in the question. Therefore, it is very difficult to get the real evaluation by the criterion-referenced measurement as far as we use MCQs. We should deepen our understanding of the limit of MCQ tests rather than we might expect the limitless possibility.
9.Career Choice.
Daizo USHIBA ; Shigekoto KAIHARA ; Taiichi SAITO ; Tsuyoshi SHIMIZU ; Rintaro NAKAYA ; Kazumasa HOSHINO ; Tasuku HONJO ; Wataru MORI
Medical Education 1986;17(1):8-15