Purpose: In Japan, only a few studies reported self-management systems of narcotic drugs among hospitalized patients. Our purpose was to develop a self-management system for patients and assess its effectiveness. Methods: Based on the results of a questionnaire administered to our hospital medical staff, methods of selecting eligible patients and methods of self-management of narcotic drugs were determined by a multi-professional team. Selection criteria for eligible patients were: 1) satisfactory results on assessment of the patient's ability to self-manage orally-administered drugs; 2) satisfactory results on assessment of the patient's ability to self-manage narcotic drugs; 3) physician's consent was obtained; and 4) the patient wanted to participate in this program. After the period of self-management of drug administration, questionnaires were distributed to the patients and medical staff in the general ward. Results: One hundred hospitalized patients used narcotic drugs between April 2008 and March 2009. Among them, 26 patients met the criteria for self-management of narcotic drugs, and 20 voluntarily participated in the program. There were no reports of missing or stolen drugs. There were no reports of administration of incorrect dose of the drug during the self-management period (average 15.0 days). Ninety-four percent of the self-managing patients provided positive feedback about self-management of narcotic drugs, such as mental stability by having drugs on hand and no problems in self-management. Seventy-five percent of staff members answered that the self-management system of narcotic drugs should be continued. Conclusion: Our results suggest that this system of narcotic drug self-management is safe and appropriate. Palliat Care Res 2010; 5(1): 114-126

Objective: The prevalence of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in patients with various urologic disorders is unknown. We conducted the survey to determine the prevalence of CAM use in ambulatory patients.
Methods: We distributed questionnaires to 331 ambulatory patients with various urologic disorders in our department from March 10 to 31, 2004.
Results: One in third (30.5%) patients reported the use of at least one CAM. Patient age and gender were not associated with the frequency of the use of CAM. Although not statistically significant, patients with malignant disease showed a higher frequency of CAM use compared with patients with benign disease; 36.2% vs 27.0%, P=0.08. Among the CAM users, only 16 patients (15.8%) informed health care staff of their CAM use.
Conclusion: This result shows the current situation of CAM use in patients with urologic disorders. Because of the high prevalence, health care professionals should ask about patients' use of CAM.

Psoriasis vulgaris and bullous pemphigoid represent 2 clinically and histologically distinct, chronic inflammatory skin conditions. The concomitant occurrence of these 2 diseases is rare, and the pathogenic relationship between psoriasis and bullous pemphigoid remains unclear. The development of bullous pemphigoid in patients with psoriasis is considered to be related to treatments for psoriasis, especially ultraviolet therapy. However, some recent reports have suggested that an immunologic or biochemical association between these two diseases plays a role in the pathogenesis. Herein, we report 3 cases of bullous pemphigoid occurring in patients with psoriasis, and we discuss the possible pathogenic mechanisms of an association between psoriasis and bullous pemphigoid.
Humans ; Pemphigoid, Bullous* ; Psoriasis* ; Skin ; Ultraviolet Therapy