To investigate the effect of teeth clenching on isokinetic knee extension at various velocities, isokinetic muscle strength during knee extension was measured in association with teeth clenching at 30, 60, 150, 300 and 450 degrees per second (deg/s) using the Cybex 6000 isokinetic dynamometer. The volunteer subjects were 9 healthy males (26.2±0.97 years) . The peak torque per body weight and average power per body weight were statistically analyzed. Our results demonstrated that the peak torque per body weight with teeth clenching at 30, 60 and 150 deg/s significantly increased by 7.0%, 7.4% and 4.9%, respectively (p<0.05), but no significant differences were found at 300 and 450 deg/s. While the average power per body weight with teeth clenching at 30, 60 and 150 deg/s significantly increased by 6.5%, 6.1% and 6.9%, respectively (p<0.05), no sig-nificant differences were found at 300 and 450 deg/s. A significant negative correlation was shown between the isokinetic angular velocity and the difference in peak torque per body weight derived from with and without teeth clenching (r=-0.699; p<0.05) . These findings suggested that the effect of teeth clenching on isokinetic muscle strength of knee extension was dependent on the angular velocity, and at lower angular velocities teeth clenching had the effect of increasing the isokinetic muscle strength during knee extension.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of teeth clenching on isokinetic knee extension force during repeated voluntary contractions. We assessed isokinetic muscle strength in association with teeth clenching during 100 consecutive knee extensions at 60 degrees per second (deg/s) using a Cybex 6000 isokinetic dynamometer. In this study, 8 healthy male volunteers (28.4 ± 3.89 years) were asked to perform isokinetic contractions in an extended cycle of five contractions without teeth clenching followed by five contractions with the teeth clenching. The peak torque per body weight was statistically analyzed. In our results, the peak torque per body weight with teeth clenching were significantly greater than those without teeth clenching in the first 70 cycles; however, no significant differences were shown at 71-100 cycles. There was a significant negative correlation between the number of knee extensions and the difference in peak torque per body weight derived from with and without teeth clenching (r=-0.475, p<0.0001) . Our findings reveal that the effect of teeth clenching on the isokinetic muscle strength of knee extension is dependent on muscular fatigue, and that the improving effect of teeth clenching on isokinetic muscle strength declines with increasing muscular fatigue.

Previous research has demonstrated that the concentric muscle strength of knee extension exerted at slow to medium angular velocities is increased by teeth clenching. This study evaluated the isokinetic eccentric strength of knee extensors at 4 angular velocities (60, 120, 180 and 240 degrees per second) with and without teeth clenching on the Cybex 6000 Extremity Testing and Rehabilitation System. Twelve healthy adult male (26.8±1.8 years) volunteered for the study. Peak torque per body weight and average power per body weight were analyzed. The results demonstrated that peak torque per body weight accompanied by teeth clenching was significantly increased at 60, 120, 180 and 240 deg/s by 9.5%, 8.2%, 8.2% and 9.8%, respectively (p<0.01) . Similarly average power per body weight during teeth clenching was significantly higher at 60, 120, 180 and 240 deg/s by 9.1%, 9.5%, 9.4% and 7.7%, respectively (p<0.05) . These findings suggest that teeth clenching is a factor that leads to augmented eccentric strength of knee extensors. Its effect appears to be independent of angular velocity.

Methods: Fifty-six patients (13 males and 43 females) with an average age of 80.2±9.2 years admitted to the hospital for FFS between 2006 and 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. The following patient data were collected using medical records: pain regions, a history of trauma, initial diagnoses, and rates of fracture detection using radiography, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Results: Forty-one patients presented with low back and/or buttock pain, nine presented with groin pain, and 17 presented with thigh or leg pain. There was no history of trauma in 18 patients (32%). At the initial visit, 27 patients (48%) were diagnosed with sacral or pelvic fragility fractures. In contrast, 29 patients (52%) were initially misdiagnosed with lumbar spine disease (23 patients), hip joint diseases (three patients), and buttock bruises (three patients). Fracture detection rates for FFS were 2% using radiography, 71% using CT, and 93% using MRI. FFS was diagnosed definitively using an MRI with a coronal short tau inversion recovery (STIR) sequence. Conclusions Some patients with FFS have leg pain with no history of trauma and are initially misdiagnosed as having lumbar spine disease, hip joint disease, or simple bruises. When these clinical symptoms are reported, we recommend considering FFS as one of the differential diagnoses and performing lumbar or pelvic MRIs, particularly coronal STIR images, to rule out FFS.

Methods: Cases of 50 patients with ASD who underwent long spinal fusion (>9 levels) with S2AI screws were retrospectively reviewed. Loosening of S2AI screws and S1 pedicle screws and bone fusion at the level of L5–S1 at 2 years after surgery were investigated using computed tomography. In addition, risk factors for loosening of S2AI screws were determined in patients with ASD. Results: At 2 years after surgery, 33 cases (66%) of S2AI screw loosening and six cases (12%) of S1 pedicle screw loosening were observed. In 40 of 47 cases (85%), bone fusion at L5–S1 was found. Pseudarthrosis at L5–S1 was not significantly associated with S2AI screw loosening (19.3% vs. 6.3%, p=0.23), but significantly higher in patients with S1 screw loosening (83.3% vs. 4.9%, p<0.001). On multivariate logistic regression analyses, high upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) level (T5 or above) (odds ratio [OR], 4.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.0–18.6; p=0.045) and obesity (OR, 11.4; 95% CI, 1.2–107.2; p=0.033) were independent risk factors for S2AI screw loosening. Conclusions High UIV level (T5 or above) and obesity were independent risk factors for S2AI screw loosening in patients with lumbosacral fixation in surgery for ASD. The incidence of lumbosacral fusion is associated with S1 screw loosening, but not S2AI screw loosening.