1.A retrospective study on sequential desensitization-rechallenge for antituberculosis drug allergy
Bernard Yu Hor THONG ; Faith Li Ann CHIA ; Sze Chin TAN ; Teck Choon TAN ; Khai Pang LEONG ; Justina Wei Lyn TAN ; Chwee Ying TANG ; Jin Feng HOU ; Grace Yin Lai CHAN ; Hiok Hee CHNG
Asia Pacific Allergy 2014;4(3):156-163
BACKGROUND: Antituberculosis (anti-TB) drug allergy often involves multiple concurrently administered drugs which subsequently need to be reinitiated as no better alternatives exist. OBJECTIVE: To describe the results of tailored sequential desensitization-rechallenge (D-R) for anti-TB drug allergy. METHODS: Consecutive patients who had undergone D-R to anti-TB drugs between 1 September 1997 and 31 January 2012 were recruited. Following resolution of the acute reaction, anti-TB drug was restarted at 1:6,000 to 1:3 of the final daily dose (FDD), with gradual single or multiple step daily dose escalation to the FDD. Subsequent drugs were sequentially added ≥3 days later when the preceding drug was tolerated. Full blood count and liver function tests were monitored prior to addition of each new drug. RESULTS: There were 11 patients of whom 10 were male, predominantly Chinese (8 patients). Regimens comprised at least 3 drugs: isoniazid (INH), rifampicin (RIF), ethambutol (EMB), pyrazinamide (PZA), or streptomycin. All patients had nonimmediate reactions, with cutaneous eruptions, where maculopapular exanthema (MPE) was the most common (8 patients). Drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DIHS) occurred in 6 patients, and Stevens Johnson syndrome (SJS) in 2 patients. D-R to INH was successful in 7/9 patients (77.8%) and to RIF/EMB/PZA/streptomycin in all. Of the 2 patients who failed INH D-R, 1 developed fever and MPE on day 3, the other MPE on day 8. D-R with INH and RIF respectively was successful in 2 patients with SJS. Among DIHS patients, 1 failed D-R with INH (fever and MPE on day 3). There were 23/25 (92%) successful D-R among the 11 patients. All patients completed TB treatment of ≥5 months' duration with no cases of drug-resistant TB. CONCLUSION: Tailored sequential TB drug D-R is successful where no better alternative therapies are available, with careful dose escalation and close monitoring, and after a careful risk-benefit assessment.
Asian Continental Ancestry Group
;
Complementary Therapies
;
Drug Eruptions
;
Drug Hypersensitivity Syndrome
;
Drug Hypersensitivity
;
Ethambutol
;
Exanthema
;
Fever
;
Humans
;
Hypersensitivity
;
Isoniazid
;
Liver Function Tests
;
Male
;
Pyrazinamide
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Rifampin
;
Risk Assessment
;
Stevens-Johnson Syndrome
;
Streptomycin
2.Shellfish/crustacean oral allergy syndrome among national service pre-enlistees in Singapore
Bernard Yu Hor THONG ; Shalini ARULANANDAM ; Sze Chin TAN ; Teck Choon TAN ; Grace Yin Lai CHAN ; Justina Wei Lyn TAN ; Mark Chong Wei YEOW ; Chwee Ying TANG ; Jinfeng HOU ; Khai Pang LEONG
Asia Pacific Allergy 2018;8(2):e18-
BACKGROUND: All Singaporean males undergo medical screening prior to compulsory military service. A history of possible food allergy may require referral to a specialist Allergy clinic to ensure that special dietary needs can be taken into account during field training and deployment. OBJECTIVE: To study the pattern of food allergy among pre-enlistees who were referred to a specialist allergy clinic to work up suspected food allergy. METHODS: Retrospective study of all pre-enlistees registered in the Clinical Immunology/Allergy New Case Registry referred to the Allergy Clinic from 1 August 2015 to 31 May 2016 for suspected food allergy. RESULTS: One hundred twenty pre-enlistees reporting food allergy symptoms other than rash alone were referred to the Allergy Clinic during the study period. Of these, 77 (64.2%) had food allergy. Among those with food allergy, mean age was 19.1 ± 1.5 years. They comprised predominantly Chinese (66.2%) and Malays (20.8%). The most commonly reported foods were shellfish/crustaceans (78%), peanut (15.6%), and egg (6.5%). Self-limiting oral allergy syndrome, OAS (itchy lips and throat with/without lip angioedema) was the most common manifestation (n = 33, 42.9%) followed by anaphylaxis (n = 23, 29.9%). Majority of OAS was from shellfish/crustacean (90.6%); of which shrimp (30.3%), crab (15.2%), and lobster (3.0%) were the most common. Mild childhood asthma (69.7%), allergic rhinitis (6.3%), and eczema (6.1%) were the most common atopic conditions among individuals with shellfish/crustacean OAS. This pattern was similar for shellfish/crustacean anaphylaxis. Skin prick tests were most commonly positive for shrimp (OAS 87.1% vs. anaphylaxis 100%), crab (OAS 95.8% vs. 90.9%), and lobster (OAS 91.7% vs. 63.6%). CONCLUSION: OAS to shellfish/crustaceans was more common than anaphylaxis among this study population of young males referred for food allergy symptoms other than rash alone.
Anaphylaxis
;
Arachis
;
Asian Continental Ancestry Group
;
Asthma
;
Eczema
;
Exanthema
;
Food Hypersensitivity
;
Humans
;
Hypersensitivity
;
Lip
;
Male
;
Mass Screening
;
Military Personnel
;
Ovum
;
Pharynx
;
Referral and Consultation
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Rhinitis, Allergic
;
Shellfish
;
Singapore
;
Skin
;
Specialization
3.EVALUATION OF APPENDICITIS MANAGEMENT DURING EARLY COVID-19 PANDEMIC AND LITERATURE REVIEW
Raymond Zhung Ming Lim ; Ee Peng Lee ; Henry Chor Lip Tan ; Jih Huei Tan ; Sze Lyn Pang ; Kuok Zhen Lee ; Visagan Diya Das ; Tuan Nur Azmah Tuan Mat
Journal of University of Malaya Medical Centre 2020;23(Special Issue COVID19):28-36
Purpose:
Numerous guidelines have been proposed in managing surgical emergencies during COVID-19 pandemic. Literature on the implications of these adjustments during this pandemic remained limited. This review aims to examine the implications of these critical adjustments with focus on appendicitis management.
Method:
This is a single-centre retrospective observational study in a Malaysian tertiary state surgical centre and review of recent guidelines and literature. Patients with appendicitis from March to May 2020 were included and medical records were reviewed and analysed.
Results:
Of the 173 appendicitis patients, 117 (67.6%) were operated and 56 (32.4%) were conservatively treated. Those screened for SARS-CoV-2 pre-operatively showed longer wait for operation (3.0 vs 2.0 days, p=0.001) and a longer hospital stay (4.5 vs 4.0 days, p=0.005). One-third of patients screened (36.6%) were expedited for surgery on clinical suspicion of complicated appendicitis and 42.1% progressed from acute to complicated appendicitis while waiting for screening result. All patients screened were COVID-19 negative. Delay due to SARS-CoV-2 screening did not result in worse outcome for appendicitis patients.
Conclusion
With the increase in incidence and rise of COVID-19 cases, routine screening by questionnaire, physical examination and naso-oropharyngeal swab may be considered to detect asymptomatic carrier, especially in regions with high infection. Regular reassessment with low threshold to expedite the surgery is necessary, to ensure satisfactory surgical outcome.