1.Analysis of Clinical Features and Pregnancy Outcomes of Antenatal and Post-natal HELLP Syndrome
Wei LI ; Liping ZHOU ; Suya KANG
Journal of Practical Obstetrics and Gynecology 2024;40(11):905-911
Objective:The clinical characteristics of pregnant women with HELLP syndrome before and after delivery and the risk factors of pregnancy outcomes were analyzed.Methods:A retrospective analysis was con-ducted on 126 cases of HELLP syndrome admitted to The Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from January 2010 to May 2021,divided into prenatal HELLP group[n=108,98 cases with severe preeclampsia(SPE)]and postpartum HELLP group(n=18,15 cases with SPE),to compare the differences in clinical charac-teristics and pregnancy outcomes between the two groups with the different onset time and whether they were complicated with SPE.Results:①Compared with the postpartum HELLP group,the prenatal HELLP group had higher systolic blood pressure in the third trimester of pregnancy,shorter time from preeclampsia to HELLP syn-drome,higher liver function abnormalities,lower platelet counts,and lower 24-hour urinary protein,with statistically significant differences(P<0.05).There was no statistically significant differences in adverse pregnancy outcomes and neonatal prognosis between the two groups(P>0.05).②When combined with SPE,the antenatal HELLP group had a shorter interval from preeclampsia to HELLP syndrome,lower platelet counts,and higher liver en-zymes than the postpartum HELLP group,with statistically significant differences(P<0.05).③There was no sig-nificant difference in clinical features between the antenatal HELLP group and the postpartum HELLP group when not complicated with SPE(P>0.05).Conclusions:There is only one difference between prenatal and postnatal HELLP syndrome in terms of the speed of disease progression,the time taken from preeclampsia to HELLP syn-drome,and both can lead to serious maternal and neonatal complications,which should be identified early in clini-cal practice.
2.Empagliflozin Protects Against Ischemic Brain Injury in Mice by Inhibiting Activation of Microglia
Ming CAO ; Xinyu ZHOU ; Suya LIU ; Yun LIU ; Wanqing ZHENG ; Xiangnan ZHANG
Chinese Journal of Modern Applied Pharmacy 2024;41(2):146-155
OBJECTIVE:
To identify the protective effect of empagliflozin on ischemic brain injury and neurological dysfunction in mice, and further explore its potential mechanism.
METHODS:
Acute cerebral ischemia model was induced by the permanent middle cerebral artery occlusion surgery in C57BL/6J mice. Empagliflozin(10 and 30 mg·kg−1) was administered to mice one hour after the onset of occlusion. Brain infarct volume and neurological defect score were assayed 24 h after surgery. Mice were subjected to photo-thrombosis and further administered with empagliflozin 3, 10, 30 mg·kg−1 intragastricly for either 7 or 14 consecutive days. The grid-walking task and the cylinder task were performed daily to determine the sensory-motor function of the mice. Alternatively, the mice were treated with 10 mg·kg−1 empagliflozin simultaneously with 10% glucose(i.p.) for 7 consecutive days after the photo-thrombosis model to evaluate their motor sensory function. Immunofluorescence staining was used to detect the activation of microglia within the infarct area 7 d after the photo-thrombosis.
RESULTS:
One hour after permanent middle cerebral artery occlusion surgery, gavage of empagliflozin significantly increased the brain infarct volume and neurological dysfunction. While in photo-thrombosis surgery, treatment of empagliflozin(10 mg·kg−1) for consecutive 7 or 14 days significantly decreased the rate of false foot in grid-walking task and the assymetric index in cylinder task. At the dose of 30 mg·kg−1, however, empagliflozin even aggravated photo-thrombosis-induced neurological dysfunction, while the dose of 3 mg·kg−1 showed no effect. Unexpectedly, the protective effect of empagliflozin(10 mg·kg−1) could not be reversed by glucose treatment. The results of immunofluorescence showed that empagliflozin(10 mg·kg−1) significantly alleviated the microglia activation in the ischemic area after the photo-thrombosis operation.
CONCLUSION
Empagliflozin cannot protect against acute ischemia-induced brain injury in mice. Empagliflozin alleviated ischemia-induced neurological dysfunction with consecutive administration in a dose-related manner. Empagliflozin-conferred neuroprotection may not be attributable to its effects on lowing blood glucose. Alternatively, empagliflozin may play a neuroprotective effect by inhibiting the excessive activation of microglia in ischemic brains.
3.Analysis of Clinical Features and Pregnancy Outcomes of Antenatal and Post-natal HELLP Syndrome
Wei LI ; Liping ZHOU ; Suya KANG
Journal of Practical Obstetrics and Gynecology 2024;40(11):905-911
Objective:The clinical characteristics of pregnant women with HELLP syndrome before and after delivery and the risk factors of pregnancy outcomes were analyzed.Methods:A retrospective analysis was con-ducted on 126 cases of HELLP syndrome admitted to The Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from January 2010 to May 2021,divided into prenatal HELLP group[n=108,98 cases with severe preeclampsia(SPE)]and postpartum HELLP group(n=18,15 cases with SPE),to compare the differences in clinical charac-teristics and pregnancy outcomes between the two groups with the different onset time and whether they were complicated with SPE.Results:①Compared with the postpartum HELLP group,the prenatal HELLP group had higher systolic blood pressure in the third trimester of pregnancy,shorter time from preeclampsia to HELLP syn-drome,higher liver function abnormalities,lower platelet counts,and lower 24-hour urinary protein,with statistically significant differences(P<0.05).There was no statistically significant differences in adverse pregnancy outcomes and neonatal prognosis between the two groups(P>0.05).②When combined with SPE,the antenatal HELLP group had a shorter interval from preeclampsia to HELLP syndrome,lower platelet counts,and higher liver en-zymes than the postpartum HELLP group,with statistically significant differences(P<0.05).③There was no sig-nificant difference in clinical features between the antenatal HELLP group and the postpartum HELLP group when not complicated with SPE(P>0.05).Conclusions:There is only one difference between prenatal and postnatal HELLP syndrome in terms of the speed of disease progression,the time taken from preeclampsia to HELLP syn-drome,and both can lead to serious maternal and neonatal complications,which should be identified early in clini-cal practice.
4.Analysis of Clinical Features and Pregnancy Outcomes of Antenatal and Post-natal HELLP Syndrome
Wei LI ; Liping ZHOU ; Suya KANG
Journal of Practical Obstetrics and Gynecology 2024;40(11):905-911
Objective:The clinical characteristics of pregnant women with HELLP syndrome before and after delivery and the risk factors of pregnancy outcomes were analyzed.Methods:A retrospective analysis was con-ducted on 126 cases of HELLP syndrome admitted to The Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from January 2010 to May 2021,divided into prenatal HELLP group[n=108,98 cases with severe preeclampsia(SPE)]and postpartum HELLP group(n=18,15 cases with SPE),to compare the differences in clinical charac-teristics and pregnancy outcomes between the two groups with the different onset time and whether they were complicated with SPE.Results:①Compared with the postpartum HELLP group,the prenatal HELLP group had higher systolic blood pressure in the third trimester of pregnancy,shorter time from preeclampsia to HELLP syn-drome,higher liver function abnormalities,lower platelet counts,and lower 24-hour urinary protein,with statistically significant differences(P<0.05).There was no statistically significant differences in adverse pregnancy outcomes and neonatal prognosis between the two groups(P>0.05).②When combined with SPE,the antenatal HELLP group had a shorter interval from preeclampsia to HELLP syndrome,lower platelet counts,and higher liver en-zymes than the postpartum HELLP group,with statistically significant differences(P<0.05).③There was no sig-nificant difference in clinical features between the antenatal HELLP group and the postpartum HELLP group when not complicated with SPE(P>0.05).Conclusions:There is only one difference between prenatal and postnatal HELLP syndrome in terms of the speed of disease progression,the time taken from preeclampsia to HELLP syn-drome,and both can lead to serious maternal and neonatal complications,which should be identified early in clini-cal practice.
5.Analysis of Clinical Features and Pregnancy Outcomes of Antenatal and Post-natal HELLP Syndrome
Wei LI ; Liping ZHOU ; Suya KANG
Journal of Practical Obstetrics and Gynecology 2024;40(11):905-911
Objective:The clinical characteristics of pregnant women with HELLP syndrome before and after delivery and the risk factors of pregnancy outcomes were analyzed.Methods:A retrospective analysis was con-ducted on 126 cases of HELLP syndrome admitted to The Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from January 2010 to May 2021,divided into prenatal HELLP group[n=108,98 cases with severe preeclampsia(SPE)]and postpartum HELLP group(n=18,15 cases with SPE),to compare the differences in clinical charac-teristics and pregnancy outcomes between the two groups with the different onset time and whether they were complicated with SPE.Results:①Compared with the postpartum HELLP group,the prenatal HELLP group had higher systolic blood pressure in the third trimester of pregnancy,shorter time from preeclampsia to HELLP syn-drome,higher liver function abnormalities,lower platelet counts,and lower 24-hour urinary protein,with statistically significant differences(P<0.05).There was no statistically significant differences in adverse pregnancy outcomes and neonatal prognosis between the two groups(P>0.05).②When combined with SPE,the antenatal HELLP group had a shorter interval from preeclampsia to HELLP syndrome,lower platelet counts,and higher liver en-zymes than the postpartum HELLP group,with statistically significant differences(P<0.05).③There was no sig-nificant difference in clinical features between the antenatal HELLP group and the postpartum HELLP group when not complicated with SPE(P>0.05).Conclusions:There is only one difference between prenatal and postnatal HELLP syndrome in terms of the speed of disease progression,the time taken from preeclampsia to HELLP syn-drome,and both can lead to serious maternal and neonatal complications,which should be identified early in clini-cal practice.
6.Analysis of Clinical Features and Pregnancy Outcomes of Antenatal and Post-natal HELLP Syndrome
Wei LI ; Liping ZHOU ; Suya KANG
Journal of Practical Obstetrics and Gynecology 2024;40(11):905-911
Objective:The clinical characteristics of pregnant women with HELLP syndrome before and after delivery and the risk factors of pregnancy outcomes were analyzed.Methods:A retrospective analysis was con-ducted on 126 cases of HELLP syndrome admitted to The Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from January 2010 to May 2021,divided into prenatal HELLP group[n=108,98 cases with severe preeclampsia(SPE)]and postpartum HELLP group(n=18,15 cases with SPE),to compare the differences in clinical charac-teristics and pregnancy outcomes between the two groups with the different onset time and whether they were complicated with SPE.Results:①Compared with the postpartum HELLP group,the prenatal HELLP group had higher systolic blood pressure in the third trimester of pregnancy,shorter time from preeclampsia to HELLP syn-drome,higher liver function abnormalities,lower platelet counts,and lower 24-hour urinary protein,with statistically significant differences(P<0.05).There was no statistically significant differences in adverse pregnancy outcomes and neonatal prognosis between the two groups(P>0.05).②When combined with SPE,the antenatal HELLP group had a shorter interval from preeclampsia to HELLP syndrome,lower platelet counts,and higher liver en-zymes than the postpartum HELLP group,with statistically significant differences(P<0.05).③There was no sig-nificant difference in clinical features between the antenatal HELLP group and the postpartum HELLP group when not complicated with SPE(P>0.05).Conclusions:There is only one difference between prenatal and postnatal HELLP syndrome in terms of the speed of disease progression,the time taken from preeclampsia to HELLP syn-drome,and both can lead to serious maternal and neonatal complications,which should be identified early in clini-cal practice.
7.Analysis of Clinical Features and Pregnancy Outcomes of Antenatal and Post-natal HELLP Syndrome
Wei LI ; Liping ZHOU ; Suya KANG
Journal of Practical Obstetrics and Gynecology 2024;40(11):905-911
Objective:The clinical characteristics of pregnant women with HELLP syndrome before and after delivery and the risk factors of pregnancy outcomes were analyzed.Methods:A retrospective analysis was con-ducted on 126 cases of HELLP syndrome admitted to The Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from January 2010 to May 2021,divided into prenatal HELLP group[n=108,98 cases with severe preeclampsia(SPE)]and postpartum HELLP group(n=18,15 cases with SPE),to compare the differences in clinical charac-teristics and pregnancy outcomes between the two groups with the different onset time and whether they were complicated with SPE.Results:①Compared with the postpartum HELLP group,the prenatal HELLP group had higher systolic blood pressure in the third trimester of pregnancy,shorter time from preeclampsia to HELLP syn-drome,higher liver function abnormalities,lower platelet counts,and lower 24-hour urinary protein,with statistically significant differences(P<0.05).There was no statistically significant differences in adverse pregnancy outcomes and neonatal prognosis between the two groups(P>0.05).②When combined with SPE,the antenatal HELLP group had a shorter interval from preeclampsia to HELLP syndrome,lower platelet counts,and higher liver en-zymes than the postpartum HELLP group,with statistically significant differences(P<0.05).③There was no sig-nificant difference in clinical features between the antenatal HELLP group and the postpartum HELLP group when not complicated with SPE(P>0.05).Conclusions:There is only one difference between prenatal and postnatal HELLP syndrome in terms of the speed of disease progression,the time taken from preeclampsia to HELLP syn-drome,and both can lead to serious maternal and neonatal complications,which should be identified early in clini-cal practice.
8.Analysis of Clinical Features and Pregnancy Outcomes of Antenatal and Post-natal HELLP Syndrome
Wei LI ; Liping ZHOU ; Suya KANG
Journal of Practical Obstetrics and Gynecology 2024;40(11):905-911
Objective:The clinical characteristics of pregnant women with HELLP syndrome before and after delivery and the risk factors of pregnancy outcomes were analyzed.Methods:A retrospective analysis was con-ducted on 126 cases of HELLP syndrome admitted to The Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from January 2010 to May 2021,divided into prenatal HELLP group[n=108,98 cases with severe preeclampsia(SPE)]and postpartum HELLP group(n=18,15 cases with SPE),to compare the differences in clinical charac-teristics and pregnancy outcomes between the two groups with the different onset time and whether they were complicated with SPE.Results:①Compared with the postpartum HELLP group,the prenatal HELLP group had higher systolic blood pressure in the third trimester of pregnancy,shorter time from preeclampsia to HELLP syn-drome,higher liver function abnormalities,lower platelet counts,and lower 24-hour urinary protein,with statistically significant differences(P<0.05).There was no statistically significant differences in adverse pregnancy outcomes and neonatal prognosis between the two groups(P>0.05).②When combined with SPE,the antenatal HELLP group had a shorter interval from preeclampsia to HELLP syndrome,lower platelet counts,and higher liver en-zymes than the postpartum HELLP group,with statistically significant differences(P<0.05).③There was no sig-nificant difference in clinical features between the antenatal HELLP group and the postpartum HELLP group when not complicated with SPE(P>0.05).Conclusions:There is only one difference between prenatal and postnatal HELLP syndrome in terms of the speed of disease progression,the time taken from preeclampsia to HELLP syn-drome,and both can lead to serious maternal and neonatal complications,which should be identified early in clini-cal practice.
9.Analysis of Clinical Features and Pregnancy Outcomes of Antenatal and Post-natal HELLP Syndrome
Wei LI ; Liping ZHOU ; Suya KANG
Journal of Practical Obstetrics and Gynecology 2024;40(11):905-911
Objective:The clinical characteristics of pregnant women with HELLP syndrome before and after delivery and the risk factors of pregnancy outcomes were analyzed.Methods:A retrospective analysis was con-ducted on 126 cases of HELLP syndrome admitted to The Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from January 2010 to May 2021,divided into prenatal HELLP group[n=108,98 cases with severe preeclampsia(SPE)]and postpartum HELLP group(n=18,15 cases with SPE),to compare the differences in clinical charac-teristics and pregnancy outcomes between the two groups with the different onset time and whether they were complicated with SPE.Results:①Compared with the postpartum HELLP group,the prenatal HELLP group had higher systolic blood pressure in the third trimester of pregnancy,shorter time from preeclampsia to HELLP syn-drome,higher liver function abnormalities,lower platelet counts,and lower 24-hour urinary protein,with statistically significant differences(P<0.05).There was no statistically significant differences in adverse pregnancy outcomes and neonatal prognosis between the two groups(P>0.05).②When combined with SPE,the antenatal HELLP group had a shorter interval from preeclampsia to HELLP syndrome,lower platelet counts,and higher liver en-zymes than the postpartum HELLP group,with statistically significant differences(P<0.05).③There was no sig-nificant difference in clinical features between the antenatal HELLP group and the postpartum HELLP group when not complicated with SPE(P>0.05).Conclusions:There is only one difference between prenatal and postnatal HELLP syndrome in terms of the speed of disease progression,the time taken from preeclampsia to HELLP syn-drome,and both can lead to serious maternal and neonatal complications,which should be identified early in clini-cal practice.
10.Diagnostic performance of ultrasound-based risk stratification systems for thyroid nodules: comparison of the C-TIRADS with the ACR-TIRADS and EU-TIRADS
Linlin ZHENG ; Shiyan LI ; Lilong XU ; Ling ZHOU ; Cong YU ; Suya MA
Chinese Journal of Ultrasonography 2021;30(9):785-791
Objective:To compare the diagnostic values of C-TIRADS, ACR-TIRADS and EU-TIRADS.Methods:According to the classification methods of the 3 guidelines, the ultrasonographic features of 283 thyroid nodules from 266 patients in Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital from January 2019 to June 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. The pathological results were taken as the gold standard, the malignant percentage of different classification was calculated, the ROC curve was plotted, the area under the ROC curve (AUC) and the best diagnostic cut-off value were calculated, and the diagnostic values of the three guidelines were compared. According to the FNA recommendations of the guidelines, the recommended number of thyroid nodules and the detection rate of malignant nodules in different guidelines were analyzed.Results:The AUCs of C-TIRADS, ACR-TIRADS and EU-TIRADS were 0.80, 0.66, 0.61, respectively. The AUC of C-TIRADS was higher than those of ACR-TIRADS and EU-TIRADS ( P<0.001, P<0.001). The best diagnostic cutoff values of C-TIRADS, ACR-TIRADS and EU-TIRADS were 4C, 5 and 5, respectively. Under the critical points, the sensitivities of the 3 guidelines were 95.27%, 98.10%, 99.53%, the specificities were 54.17%, 33.33%, 20.83%, respectively. There was no significant difference in the number of FNA recommendations among the 3 guidelines(all P>0.05), their FNA recommendations were highly consistent (Kappa>0.9). Conclusions:The diagnostic value of C-TIRADS in the classification of benign and malignant thyroid nodules is higher than those of ACR-TIRADS and EU-TIRADS. The best critical value for diagnosis of thyroid nodules is C-TIRADS 4C. The three guidelines are similar in the number of FNA recommendations and the detection rate of malignancy.


Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail