Objective To analyze the papers published by domestic scientific research workers in order to improve the academic level of their papers. Methods The papers published by over 3000 domestic scientific research workers were investigated with questionnaires. Their motives to publish papers and the relation between the number of pub-lished papers and the assessment of their performance were analyzed. Results The number of papers published by domestic scientific research workers was increased. However, their academic level was to be further improved. Over quantization of the assessment mechanisms for scientific research increased the external motives to publish papers, thus leading to the insufficient internal motives of them to engage in scientific research. Conclusion A loose and comfortable academic environment should be created for the scientific research workers in order to initiate their in-ternal motives to publish papers. Over quantization of the assessment mechanisms for scientific research should be changed in order to reduce the external motives of domestic scientific research workers to publish papers. Innovative and cultural environment should be created in order to improve the soft power of scientific research in our country.

Chinese Association for Science and Technology in conjunction with Beijing Institute of Biotechnology and Beijing Science and Technology Consulting Center carried out a survey of the research publications by science and technology professionals in China in year 2014.Based on the overall survey data,we selected the group of medical professionals,including medical organization personal according to the classification of different types of units and health care personals according to the job type,and analyzed the status of research publications,including the number of papers published,motivation,stress,evaluation mechanisms,journal selection,and compared with other classification groups.

Objective To explore the effect of web problem-based learning in electrocardiography (ECG) teaching.Methods 100 clinical medical students from Grade 2014 were randomly selected and divided into two groups,with 50 in each.The control group received traditional methods in ECG teaching,while the WPBL teaching method was conducted in experimental group.The effect of ECG teaching in two groups were evaluated and analyzed by test scores and questionnaire survey.Continuous variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation and were compared by t-test.Categorical variables were expressed as counts and percentages.Counting data were test by Chi-square.Results Comparing with control group,students in the experimental group performed better on independent learning capability,interesting of learning ECG,ability to analyze and solve problems,team cooperation,self-presentation and presentation skills (P＜0.05).The average experimental score in experimental group was higher than that in control group [(32.91 ± 3.56) vs.(27.38 ± 4.63),P＜0.05].There were no significant differences of theoretical scores between the two groups [(54.16 ± 3.87) vs.(52.84 ± 4.56),P＞0.05].Conclusion WPBL teaching could improve medical students' interest in electrocardiogram learning and cultivates their ability of active learning and problem solving,which is worthy of promotion.